Skip to main content
Log in

Menage à trois: Freud, Beauvoir, and the Marquis de Sade

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Without rejecting Simone de Beauvoir's often cited feminist agenda, this paper takes up her less frequently noted insight – that woman's existence as the inessential other is more than a consequence of material dependency, and political inequality. This insight traces women's subordinated status to the effect of a patriarchal desire that produces and is sustained by a political imaginary that is not economically grounded and is not undermined by women's economic or political progress. Taking up this insight, this paper reads Beauvoir, Freud and Sade through each other, to critique the myths of femininity. It argues that unless feminists of the 21st century follow Beauvoir's logic of ambiguity to challenge the ways in which sexed and gendered subjectivity is currently structured, the place of the inessential other will be preserved, and the feminist vision will be betrayed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berghoffen, D. Menage à trois: Freud, Beauvoir, and the Marquis de Sade. Continental Philosophy Review 34, 151–163 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017925122900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017925122900

Keywords

Navigation