Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic revision of the genus Petromica Topsent (Demospongiae: Halichondrida), with a new species from the southwestern Atlantic

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The status, scope and classification of the sublithistid demosponge genus Petromica Topsent are revised through morphological analysis of museum specimens of all seven species (including proposed synonyms and varieties), two of which were collected and observed in situ along the Brazilian coast (P. ciocalyptoides (Van Soest & Zea) and P. citrina sp. n.). The synonymy of Petromica and Monanthus Kirkpatrick with priority to the former is justified due to the consistent presence of monocrepid rhizoclone desmas and oxeas in an halichondroid arrangement, and to the lack of co-variance in other morphological characters among the species studied (presence and shape of papillae, surface texture, ectosomal skeleton and desma shape). The proposed synonymy of P. grimaldii Topsent and P. massalis Dendy is refuted due to differences in habit and spicule shape between the two species. Three forms described as varieties of Monanthus plumosus Kirkpatrick are raised to species level: P. plumosa (Kirkpatrick), P. tubulata (Kirkpatrick) and P. digitata (Burton). Phylogenetic analysis indicates that two possibly monophyletic clades may be recognized within Petromica, although with low bootstrap support (35–59%): (P. ciocalyptoides, P. citrina) and (P. grimaldii, P. massalis) (P. plumosa) (P. tubulata) (P. digitata). The classification of Petromica within the Halichondriidae (order Halichondrida) is supported by the confused reticulation of long oxeote spicules with ascending spicule tracts, present in all species of the genus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcolado, P. M., 1984. Nuevas espécies de esponjas encontradas en Cuba. Poeyana 271: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C., 1899. Substitución de nombres genéricos, 3. Commun. Mus. nac. Buenos Aires 1: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, P. R., 1978. Sponges. University of California Press, Los Angeles: 268 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boury-Esnault, N., M. Pansini & M. J. Uriz, 1994. Spongiaires bathyaux de la mer d'Alboran et du golfe ibéro-marocain. Mém. Mus. natn. Hist. nat. Paris, A, Zool. 160: 1–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerbank, J. S., 1862. On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae, 3. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. 152: 1087–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerbank, J. S., 1864. A monograph of the British Spongiadae, 1. Trans. r. Soc., Lond.: 1–290.

  • Burton, M., 1928. Report on some deep-sea sponges from the Indian Museum collected by the R.I.M.S. ‘Investigator’, 2. Tetraxonida (concluded) and Euceratosa. Rec. ind. Mus. 30: 109–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M., 1929. Descriptions of South African sponges collected in the South African Marine Survey, 2. The ‘Lithistidae’ with a critical survey of the desma-forming sponges. Fish. mar. Biol. Surv. Rep. 2(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, P. A. & M. F. B. A. Santos, 1980. Zoogeografia Marinha do Brasil. 1. Considerações gerais sobre o método e aplicação a um grupo de crustáceos (Paguros: Crustacea Decapoda, superfamílias Paguroidea e Coenobitoidea). Bol. Inst. oceanogr., S. Paulo 29(2): 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laubenfels, M. W., 1934. New sponges from the Puerto Rican deep. Smithson. Misc. Collect. 91(17): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laubenfels, M.W., 1936. A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Pap. Tortugas Lab. 30: 1–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendy, A., 1905. Report on the sponges collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. Ceylon Pearl Oyster Fish. Suppl. Rep. 18: 57–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendy, A., 1921. Report on the Sigmatotetraxonida collected by the HMS ‘sealark’ in the Indian Ocean. Trans. linn. Soc. Lond. 18: 1–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, M. C., R.W.M. Van Soest & S. A. Pomponi, 1991. A systematic revision of the Central-Atlantic Halichondrida (Demospongiae, Porifera). Part 1: Evaluation of characters and diagnosis of genera. In Reitner, J. E. & H. Keupp (eds), Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, M. C., S. A. Pomponi & R. W. M. Van Soest, 1993. A systematic revision of the Central West Atlantic Halichondrida (Demospongiae, Porifera). Part 3: Description of valid species. Sci. Mar. 57(4): 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits in phylogeny: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., 1828. A history of British animals. Bell and Bradfut, Edinburgh: 565 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, P., 1998. First record and new species of Gastrophanella (Porifera: Demospongiae: Lithistida) from the central East Pacific. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 111: 774–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. E., 1826. Animal kingdom. In Todd, R. B, (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology, 1. Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, London: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, G., 1993. Mesozoische und rezente desmentragende Demospongiae (Porifera, ‘Lithistidae’) (Paläobiologie, Phylogenie und Taxonomie). Berliner geowiss. Abh. E 10: 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajdu, E., R. G. S. Berlinck & J. C. De Freitas, 1999. Porifera. In Migotto, A. E. & C. G. Tiago (eds), Biodiversidade do Estado de São Paulo: Síntese do Conhecimento ao Final do Século XX (ser. ed. C. A. Joly & C. E. M. Bicudo), 3, Invertebrados Marinhos. Fapesp, São Paulo: 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, E., 1912. Kiesel-und Hornschwämme der Aru-und Kei-Inseln. Abh. senken. Naturf. Gesellsch. 34: 291–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra, F. & R. W. M. Van Soest, 1991. Didiscus verdensis spec. nov. (Porifera: Halichondrida) from the Cape Verde Islands, with a revision and phylogenetic classification of the genus Didiscus. Zool. Med. Leiden 65(4): 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly-Borges, M. & S. A. Pomponi, 1994. Phylogeny and classification of lithistid sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae): a preliminary assessment using ribosomal DNA sequence comparisons. Mol. mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3(2): 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, R., 1902. Descriptions of South African sponges. Part 1. Mar. Invest. S. Africa Dept. Agricult. 1: 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, R., 1903. Description of South African Sponges. Part 2. Mar. Invest. S. Africa Dept. Agricult. 2: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtén, B., 1972. The Ice Age. Rupert Hart-Davis, London: 179 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborel, J., 1969. Les peuplements de madréporaires des côtes tropicales du Brésil. Ann. Univ. Abidjan Ser. E2(3): 1–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, C., 1996. Esponjas da Ilha da Galé, Reserva Marinha Biológica do Arvoredo, Santa Catarina, Brasil (Porifera: Demospongiae). Biociências 4(2): 101–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi, C., 1973. Systématique de la classe des Demospongiaria (Démosponges). In Brien, P., C. Lévi, M. Sarà, O. Tuzet & J. Vacelet (eds), Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie (ser. ed. P. P. Grassé), 3, Spongiaires. Masson et Cie., Paris: 577–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W-H. & A. Zharkikh, 1994. What is the bootstrap technique? Syst. Biol. 43: 424–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, M., M. C. Carmona, M. J. Uriz & A. Cruzado, 1999. Decline in Mesozoic reef-building sponges explained by silicon limitation. Nature 401: 785–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothes, B. & C. M. M. Silva, 1999. Esponjas com desmas do Atlântico Sul-Brasileiro (Porifera, Demospongiae) com duas novas espécies. Iheringia, Zool. 86: 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muricy, G. & F. Moraes, 1998. Marine sponges of Pernambuco state, NE Brazil. Rev. bras. Oceanogr. 46(2): 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muricy, G. & J. V. Minervino, 2000. A new species of Gastrophanella from Central Western Atlantic, with a discussion of the family Siphonidiidae (Demospongiae: Lithistida). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 80: 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muricy, G., E. Hajdu, M. Custodio, M. Klautau, C. Russo & S. Peixinho, 1991. Sponge distribution at Arraial do Cabo, SE Brazil. In Magoon, O. T., H. Converse, V. Tippie, L. T. Tobin & D. Clark (eds), Coastal Zone' 91: Proc. VII Symp. Coast. Ocean. Manag., ASCE Publications, Long Beach: 1183–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. M., P. Tréguer, M. A. Brzezinski, A. Leynaert & B. Quéguiner, 1995. Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation. Glob. Biochem. Cycl. 9: 352–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacio, F. J., 1982. Revisión zoogeográfica marina del sur del Brasil. Bol. Inst. oceanogr., S. Paulo 31(1): 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. H., 1910. The reactions of sponges, with a consideration of the origin of the nervous system. J. exp. Zool. 8: 765–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C., 1979. Biogeography. John-Wiley & Sons, New York: 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponi, S. A., A. E. Wright, M. C. Diaz & R. W. M. Van Soest, 1991. A systematic revision of the Central-Atlantic Halichondrida (Demospongiae, Porifera). Part 2. Patterns of distribution of secondary metabolites. In Reitner, J. E. & H. Keupp (eds), Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulitzer-Finali, G., 1970. Report on a collection of sponges from the Bay of Naples. 1. Sclerospongiae, Lithistida, Tetractinellida, Epipolasida. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 38: 328–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulitzer-Finali, G., 1986. A collection of west indian demospongiae (Porifera). In appendix, a list of the demospongiae hitherto recorded from the West Indies. Ann. Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Genova 86: 65–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, C. M. D., 1991. Agulhas retroflection rings in the South Atlantic Ocean: an overview. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 11: 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, O., 1868. Die Spongien der küste von Algier. Mit Nachträgen zu den Spongien der Adriatischen Meeres (drittes supplement). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig: 44 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, O., 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien Fauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig: 85 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, O., 1879. Die spongien des Meerbussen von Mexico. Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS ‘Blake’. Gustav Fischer, Jena: 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony Version 3.1.1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.: 197 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topsent, E., 1889. Quelques spongiaires du Banc de Campêche et de la Pointe-à-Pitre. Mém. Soc. zool. France 2: 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topsent, E., 1892. Contribution à l'étude des spongiaires de l'Atlantique Nord. Rés. Camp. sci. Prince Albert 1er. Monaco 2: 1–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topsent, E., 1898. Éponges nouvelles des Açores. Mém. Soc. zool. France 11: 225–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topsent, E., 1904. Spongiaires des Açores. Rés. Camp. sci. Prince Albert 1er. Monaco 25: 1–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topsent, E., 1928. Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée, provenant des croisières du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco. Rés. Camp. sci. Prince Albert 1er. Monaco 74: 1–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, M. J., 1988. Deep-water sponges from the continental shelf and slope off Namibia (southwest Africa): classes Hexactinellida and Demospongiae. Monogr. Zool. mar. 3: 9–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, R. W. M. & S. Zea, 1986. A new sublithistid sponge, Monanthus ciocalyptoides n. sp. (Porifera, Halichondriida) from the West Indian region. Bull. zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam 10: 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, R. W. M. & J. N. A. Hooper, 1993. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the marine sponge genus Rhabderemia Topsent, 1890 (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida). Sci. Mar. 57(4): 319–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, R. W. M. & E. Hajdu, 2000. New species of Desmanthus (Porifera, Demospongiae) with a discussion of its ordinal relationships. Zoosystema 22(2): 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, R. W. M., M. C. Diaz & S. A. Pomponi, 1990. Phylogenetic classification of the Halichondriids (Porifera, Demospongiae). Beaufortia 40(2): 15–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, R. W. M., J. N. A. Hooper & F. Hiemstra, 1991. Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the marine sponge genus Acarnus (Porifera: Poecilosclerida). Beaufortia 42: 49–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Lendenfeld, R., 1903. Tetraxonia. Das Tierreich 19: 1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosmaer, G. C. J., 1887. Klassen und Ordnungen der Spongien (Porifera). In Bronn, H. G. (ed.), Die Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-reichs. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig: 496 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoneshigue, Y., 1985. Taxonomie et ecologie des algues marines dans la Région de Cabo Frio, R.J. (Brésil). PhD Thesis, Université d'Aix-Marseille 2, Marseilles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muricy, G., Hajdu, E., Minervino, J.V. et al. Systematic revision of the genus Petromica Topsent (Demospongiae: Halichondrida), with a new species from the southwestern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 443, 103–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017504422239

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017504422239

Navigation