Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The CoMFA steroids as a benchmark dataset for development of 3D QSAR methods

  • Published:
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cramer, R. D., III, Patterson, D. E. and Bunce, J. D., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA): 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959-5967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn, J. F., Nisula, B. C. and Rodbard, D., Transport of steroid hormones: Binding of 21 endogenous steroids to both testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin in human plasma, J. Clin. Endocrin. Metab., 2 (1981) 58-68.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mickelson, K. E., Forsthoefel, J. and Westphal, U., Steroid-protein interactions: Human corticosteroid binding globulin-some physicochemical properties and binding specificity, Biochemistry, 20 (1981) 6211-6218.

    Google Scholar 

  4. JMP Statistical Discovery Software, Version 3.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, U. S. A.

  5. Wagener, M., Sadowski, J. and Gasteiger, J., Autocorrelation of molecular surface properties for modeling corticosteroid binding globulin and cytosolic Ah receptor activity by neural networks, J. Am Chem., Soc., 117 (1995) 7769-7775.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tripos Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Road, St. Louis, MO 63144, U. S. A.

  7. Patterson, D. E., personal communication.

  8. Gasteiger, J. and Marsili, M., Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity: A rapid access to atomic charges, Tetrahedron, 36 (1980) 3219-3288.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, S. J. and Tropsha, A., Cross-validated R2-guided region selection for comparative molecular field analysis: A simple method to achieve consistent results, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 1060-1066.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baroni, M., Costantino, G., Cruciani, G., Riganelli, D., Valigi, R. and Clementi, S., Generating optimal linear PLS estimations (GOLPE): An advanced chemometric tool for handling 3D QSAR problems, Quant. Struct.-Act. Rel., 12 (1993) 9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norinder, U., Single and domain mode variable selection in 3D QSAR applications, J. Chemometrics, 10 (1996) 95-105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kellogg, G. E., Kier, L. B., Gaillard, P. and Hall, L. H., E-state fields: Applications to 3D QSAR, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 513-520.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham, D. J. and Kellogg, G. E., The effect of physical organic properties on hydrophobic fields, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 41-49.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jain, A. N., Koile, K. and Chapman, D., Compass: Predicting biological activities from molecular surface properties-performance comparisons on a steroid benchmark, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 2315-2327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anzali, S., Barnickel, G., Krug, M., Sadowski, J., Wagener, M., Gasteiger, J. and Polanski, J., The comparison of geometric and electronic properties of molecular surfaces by neural networks: Application to the analysis of corticosteroid-binding globulin activity of steroids, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 521-534.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn, M. and Rogers, D., Receptor surface models: 2. Application to quantitative structure-activity relationships studies, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 2091-2102.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Good, A. C., So, S. and Richards, W. G., Structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 433-438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Good, A. C., Peterson, S. J. and Richards, W. G., QSARs from similarity matrices: Technique validation and application in the comparison of different similarity evaluation methods, J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 2929-2937.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Automated Similarity Package, Oxford Molecular Group, Oxford, U. K.

  20. Sadowski, J., personal communication.

  21. Klebe, G., Abraham, U. and Mietzner, T., Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4130-4146.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kearsley, S. K. and Smith, G. M., An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap, Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 615-633.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abraham, U. and Kubinyi, H., personal communication.

  24. Silverman, B. D. and Platt, D. E., Comparative molecular moment analysis (CoMMA): 3D QSAR without molecular superposition, J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 2129-2140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bravi, G., Gancia, E., Mascagni, P., Pegna, M., Todeschini, R. and Zaliani, A., MS-WHIM, new 3D theoretical descriptors derived from molecular surface properties: A comparative 3D QSAR study in a series of steroids, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 11 (1997) 79-92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schnitker, J., Gopalaswamy, R. and Crippen, G. M., Objective models for steroid binding sites of human globulins, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 11 (1997) 93-110.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oprea, T. I., Ciubotariu, D., Sulea, T. I. and Simon, Z., Comparison of the minimal steric difference (MTD) and comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) methods for analysis of binding of steroids to carrier proteins, Quant. Struct-Act. Relat., 12 (1993) 21-26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oprea, T. I., personal communication.

  29. Vorpagel, E. R., Analysis of steroid binding using apex-3D and 3D QSAR models. 210th American Chemical Society Meeting, Chicago, 1995, COMP-0125.

  30. Golender, V. E. and Vorpagel, E. R., Computer-assisted pharmacophore identification, In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D-QSAR in drug design: Theory, methods, and applications, ESCOM, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 137-149.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vorpagel, E. R., personal communication.

  32. Kubinyi, H., A general view on similarity and QSAR studies, In van de Waterbeemd, H., Testa, B. and Folkers, G. (Eds.) Computer-assisted lead finding and optimization, Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, Lausanne, Switzerland, Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta and VCH: Basel, Weinheim, 1997, pp. 7-28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9373 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, CA, 92121, U.S.A.

    Eugene A. Coats

Authors
  1. Eugene A. Coats
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coats, E.A. The CoMFA steroids as a benchmark dataset for development of 3D QSAR methods. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design 12, 199–213 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017050508855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017050508855

Keywords

Search

Navigation