Skip to main content
Log in

Economic sanctions as the propositional satisfiability problem

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we are trying to answer the question of when economic sanctions have the best chance to succeed. Almost three hundred scholars from around the world participated in a survey designed to define which pre-conditions and actions by the sender are desirable in order for economic sanctions to succeed. The resolution algorithm is employed to find out whether there is a consensus among the scholars about the factors leading to the success of economic sanctions. The results provide evidence that when scholars were grouped by region the consensus could be reached that sanctions will succeed if: (1) modest policy change is sought, (2) sanctions are comprehensive, i.e., both trade and financial sanctions are imposed, (3) the target does not receive significant support from a third party, (4) the sender has much greater economy than the target, (5) there is international co-operation in the imposition of sanctions, and (6) the target is economically and politically weak and unstable. When scholars were grouped based on the level of economic development of their countries of origin, a consensus on all but one issue (sender’s welfare or economic interest are threatened by target’s action) was reached between scholars from economically developed nations and scholars from less developed nations. Surprisingly, experts from economically developed nations, i.e., the United States versus EU nations, could not reach a consensus on several issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amuzegar, J. (1997). 'Adjusting to sanctions,' Foreign Affairs 76 (3): 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Z., B. Scowcroft and R. Murphy (1997). 'Differentiated containment,' Foreign Affairs 76 (3): 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonetti, S. (1994). 'The persistence and frequency of economic sanctions,' in M. Chatterji, H. Jager and A. Rima, eds., The Economics of International Security: Essays in Honour of Jan Tinbergen. New York: St. Martin's Press; London: Macmillan Press, pp. 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonetti, S. (1997). 'The analysis and interpretation of economic sanctions,' Journal of Economic Studies 24 (5): 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. D. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. and M. Engers (1992). 'Sanctions,' Journal of Political Economy 100 (5): 899–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. Jr. and T. W. Mangione (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A. (1998). 'Kautilya versus Machiavelli,' Indian Business Standard.

  • Hooker, J. N. Jr. (1995). 'Logic-based benders decomposition,' Working Paper, Pittsburgh, PA (U.S.A.): Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C., J. J. Schott and K. A. Elliot (1985). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C., J. J. Schott and K. A. Elliot (1990). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy, 2nd ed. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempfer, W. H. and A. D. Lowenberg (1992). International Economic Sanctions: A Public Choice Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1978). Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. L. (1992). Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. S. (1979). 'Economic coercion in world politics, with a focus on North-South relationships,' World Politics 31: 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1952). 'The problem of simplifying truth functions,' American Mathematical Monthly 59: 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1955). 'A way to simplify truth functions,' American Mathematical Monthly 62: 627–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. (1965). 'A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle,' Journal of the ACM 12: 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (1991-1997). World Development Report (issues 1991-1997). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (1987). 'The determinants of success and failure of economic sanctions: Some empirical results,' Development and Security 22: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (1989). 'Success and failure of economic sanctions,' Kyklos 42: 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (1994a). 'Effectivity of economic sanctions: Illusion or reality?' Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 2 (1): 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (1994b). Economic Diplomacy, Trade and Commercial Policy: Positive and Negative Sanctions in a New World Order. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk, P. A. G. and C. van Marrewijk (1994). 'Economic sanctions: A hidden cost of the new world order,' in M. Chatterji, H. Jager and A. Rima, eds., The Economics of International Security: Essays in Honour of Jan Tinbergen. New York: St. Martin's Press; London: Macmillan Press, pp. 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miljkovic, D. Economic sanctions as the propositional satisfiability problem. Policy Sciences 35, 1–15 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016039302923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016039302923

Keywords

Navigation