Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Buccal Delivery of Opioid Analgesics and Antagonists with Bitterless Prodrugs

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buccal delivery of opioid analgesics and antagonists is a useful way of improving bioavailability relative to the oral route. These compounds taste bitter, however. Various prodrugs of nalbuphine, naloxone, naltrexone, oxymorphone, butorphanol, and levallorphan, in which the 3-phenolic hydroxyl group was esterified, lacked a bitter taste. This taste difference was not due to differences in water solubility, suggesting that for these compounds the phenolic functional group is important for interaction with the taste receptor. In rats, nalbuphine, naloxone, and naltrexone administered buccally as prodrugs exhibited up to 90% bioavailability. In dogs, the bitter taste of buccally administered nalbuphine and naloxone caused salivation and swallowing, and bioavailability was low. Buccal dosing of the prodrugs of these compounds caused no adverse effects and the bioavailability ranged from 35 to 50%, a significant improvement relative to the oral bioavailability, which is 5% or less. The feasibility of buccal prodrug delivery using an adhesive patch formulation was demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. A. Hussain, B. J. Aungst, and E. Shefter. J. Pharm. Sci. 75:218–219 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Hussain, B. J. Aungst, A. Kearney, and E. Shefter. Int. J. Pharm. 36:127–130 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. E. S. Bullingham, H. J. McQuay, E. J. B. Porter, M. C. Allen, and R. A. Moore. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 13:665–673 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. D. D. Bell, G. R. Murray, P. Mishra, T. N. Calvey, B. D. Weldon, and N. E. Williams. Lancet 1:71–73 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. P. Fisher, P. Vine, J. Whitlock, and M. Hanna. Anaesthesia 41:1104–1111 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. F. H. Ho. J. Pharm. Sci. 73:600–603 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Sinkula, W. Morozowich, and E. L. Rowe. J. Pharm. Sci. 62:1106–1111 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Sinkula and S. H. Yalkowsky. J. Pharm. Sci. 64:181–210 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. J. Aungst, M. J. Myers, E. Shefter, and E. G. Shami. Int. J. Pharm. 38:199–209 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. Hussain, C. A. Koval, M. J. Myers, E. G. Shami, and E. Shefter. J. Pharm Sci. 76:356–358 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Brewster, M. J. Humphrey, and M. A. McLeavy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 33:500–506 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. E. S. Bullingham, H. J. McQuay, D. Dwyer, M. C. Allen, and R. A. Moore. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 12:117–122 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. J. Aungst, G. Lam, and E. Shefter. Biopharm. Drug Disp. 6:413–421 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussain, M.A., Aungst, B.J., Koval, C.A. et al. Improved Buccal Delivery of Opioid Analgesics and Antagonists with Bitterless Prodrugs. Pharm Res 5, 615–618 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015958417047

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015958417047

Navigation