Abstract
Hamblin held that the conception of 'fallacy' as an argument that seems valid but is not really so was the dominant conception of fallacy in the history of fallacy studies. The present paper explores the extent of support that there is for this view. After presenting a brief analysis of 'the standard definition of fallacy,' a number of the definitions of 'fallacy' in texts from the middle of this century – from the standard treatment – are considered. This is followed by a review of the definitions of 'fallacy' in the earlier history of logic books, including those of Aristotle, Whately, Mill and De Morgan. The essay concludes that there is scarcely any support for Hamblin's view that this particular definition of 'fallacy' was widely held.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aristotle: 1955, On Sophistical Refutations, E. S. Forster, trans., Harvard University Press, London. (Loeb Classical Library.)
Aristotle: 1960, Topics, E. S. Forster, trans., in Posterior Analytics, Topica, Harvard University Press, London. (Loeb Classical Library.)
Arnauld, Antoine and Pierre Nicole: 1662/1996, Logic or the Art of Thinking, J. V. Buroker, trans. and ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beardsley, Monroe C.: 1950, Practical Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Black, Max: 1946, Critical Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Carney, James D. and Richard K. Scheer: 1964, Fundamentals of Logic, Macmillan, New York.
Cohen, Morris R. and Ernest Nagel: 1934, Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Copi, Irving M.: 1961, Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York.
Creighton, James Edward: 1905, An Introductory Logic, MacMillan, New York.
De Morgan, Augustus: 1847, Formal Logic, Taylor and Walton, London.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1995, ‘The Pragma-dialectical Approach to Fallacies’, in Hansen and Pinto, pp. 130–144.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans et al.: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Fearnside, W. Ward and William K. Holther: 1959, Fallacies: The Counterfeit of Argument, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Grootendorst, Rob: 1986, ‘Some Fallacies About Fallacies’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Foris, Dordrecht.
Hamblin, Charles L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Hansen, Hans V. and Robert C. Pinto (eds.): 1995, Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University of Pennsylvania Press, University Park, Penn.
Jevons, Stanley W.: 1877, Elementary Lessons in Logic: Deductive and Inductive, MacMillan, London.
Johnson, Ralph H.: 1987, ‘The Blaze of her Splendours: Suggestions About Revitalizing Fallacy Theory’, Argumentation 1, 239–253. Also in Hansen and Pinto, pp. 107–119.
Johnson, Ralph H.: 1990, ‘Hamblin on the Standard Treatment’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 23, 153–167. Also in Ralph H. Johnson, The Rise of Informal Logic, Vale Press, Newport News, VA, pp. 153–166.
Joseph, H. W. B.: 1916, An Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford.
Mackie, John L.: 1967, ‘Fallacies’, in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 3. MacMillan, New York, pp. 169–179.
Massey, Gerald J.: 1981, ‘The Fallacy Behind Fallacies’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489–500. Also in Hansen and Pinto, pp. 159–171.
Mill, John Stuart: 1843, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Reprinted, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1974.
Oesterle, John A.: 1963, Logic: The Art of Defining and Reasoning, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Rescher, Nicholas: 1964, Introduction to Logic, St. Martin's Press, New York.
Salmon, Wesley: 1963, Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Schipper, Edith W. and Edward Schuh: 1960, A First Course in Modern Logic, Henry Holt, New York.
Sellars, Roy Wood: 1917, The Essentials of Logic, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Sidgwick, Alfred: 1884, Fallacies. A View of Logic from the Practical Side, Appleton and Co., New York.
Watts, Isaac: 1796, Logick: or, The Right Use of Reason, 2nd ed. Reprinted, Garland, New York, 1984. Originally published in 1725.
Whately, Richard: 1844, Elements of Logic, 8th ed., B. Fellowes, London. Originally published 1826.
William of Sherwood (13th c.): 1966, Introduction to Logic, translated by Norman Kretzman, Greenwood, Westport Conn.
Woods, John, and Hans V. Hansen: to appear, ‘Is Aristotle's Non-cause Cause Worth Knowing About?’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, H.V. The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy'. Argumentation 16, 133–155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015509401631
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015509401631