Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular Analysis of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus-Sudan Reveals an Evolutionary History of Recombination

  • Published:
Virus Genes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monopartite begomoviral DNAs (2761 bp) were cloned and sequenced from field cotton, okra, and Sida alba, from Gezira, and field okra from Shambat. Comparison of the four apparent full-length begomoviral DNAs revealed 99.3–99.5% shared nucleotide (nt) identity, indicating that they are the same viral species, hereafter, referred to as Cotton leaf curl virus-Sudan (CLCuV-SD). Host range studies revealed that the field okra isolate of CLCuV-SD was whitefly-t ransmissible from okra to okra, M. parviflora, and hollyhock, but not to cotton. In contrast, the cotton isolate of CLCuV-SD infected cotton and hollyhock, but not okra. The genome of CLCuV-SD encodes six open reading frames (ORFs), and was most closely related to other monopartite begomoviruses of the Eastern Hemisphere. CLCuV-SD shared highest nucleotide sequence identity (95.5%) with Okra enation virus (OkEV), but was distantly related (≈74% nt sequence identity) to begomoviruses isolated from cotton in Pakistan. While extensive genomic regions of CLCuV-SD and OkEV are highly conserved (≈99% nt identity), nt sequence identity of the V1 ORF encoding the coat protein was uncharacteristically low (87.9%), suggesting a history of recombination. An analysis conducted with Sawyer's GENECONV program support the recombination hypothesis, indicating that the V1 ORF and a small segment of the intergenic region of CLCuV-SD and OkEV were derived from other begomoviruses. As a BLAST analysis failed to identify a prospective extant source of either V1 ORF, the parental viruses serving as CP donors remain undiscovered or are extinct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown J.K., FAO Plant Prot Bull 39, 5-23, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkoatrick T.W., Bull Ent Res 12, 323-363, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nour A.M. and Nour J.J., Emp Cott Gr Rev 70, 99-103, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elnur E. and Abu Salih H.S., PANS 16, 121-131, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mansoor S., Bedford I., Pinner M.S., Stanely J., and Markham P.G., J Botany 25, 105-107, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nateshan H.M., Muniyappa V., Swanson M.M., and Harrison B.D., Ann Appl Biol 128, 233-244, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abdel-Salam A.M., El-Shazly M.A., and Thouvenel J.C., Arab Biotechnol 1(1), 41-58, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mansoor S., Khan S.H., Hussain M., Zafar Y., and Pinner M.S., Plant Dis 84, 101, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison R.D., Liu Y.L., Khalid S., Hamed S., and Otim-Nape G.W., Ann Appl Biol 130, 61-75, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sanz A.I., Fraile A., Garcia-Arenal F., Zhou X., and Robinson D.J., J Gen Virol 81, 1839-1849, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Idris A.M. and Brown J.K., Plant Dis 84, 809, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle J.J. and Doyle J.L., Phytochem Bull 19, 11-15, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ewing B., Hillier L., Wendl M.C., and Green P., Genome Res 8, 175-185, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swofford D.L., PAUP * : Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony ( * and other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Assoc. Sunderland, MA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sawyer S., Mol Biol Evol 6, 526-538, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Padidam M., Sawyer S., and Fauquet C.M., Virology 265, 218-225, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arguello-Astorga G.R., Herrera-Estrella L., and Rivera-Bustamante R., Plant Mol Biol 26, 553-556, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Padidam M., Beachy R.N., and Fauquet C.F., J Gen Virol 76, 249-263, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rybicki E.P., Arch Virol 139, 49-77, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Briddon R.W., Mansoor S., Bedford I.D., Pinner M.S., and Saunders K., Virology 285, 234-243, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dry I.B., Rigden J.E., Krake L.R., Mullineaux P.M., and Rezaian A.M., J Gen Virol 74, 147-151, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mayo M.A. and Pringle C.R., Virology 79, 649-657, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Briddon R.W., Mansoor S., Bedford I.D., Pinner M.S., and Markham P.G., Phytopathology 90, S9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith K. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Idris, A.M., Brown, J.K. Molecular Analysis of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus-Sudan Reveals an Evolutionary History of Recombination. Virus Genes 24, 249–256 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015380600089

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015380600089

Navigation