Skip to main content
Log in

Cigarette Consumption in Different U.S. States, 1955–1998: An Empirical Analysis of the Potential Use of Excise Taxation to Reduce Smoking

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of excise taxation as a tool for financing part of Medicaid and national health care costs as well as for discouraging smoking behavior was a major political issue in the 1980s and early 1990s. It failed to gain Congressional support despite a significant increase in both federal and most state tax rates over the past twenty years. Annual data and OLS techniques are used to analyze the demand for cigarettes in the 50 states and the District of Columbia over the period from 1955 to 1998. Results show the demand for cigarettes to be relatively price inelastic. However, the estimates indicate more elasticity for high tax states than for low tax states. The price inelastic coefficient of the aggregate demand suggests that the main impact of taxation is likely to result in increased revenues to states rather than in directly reducing tobacco usage. The ultimate impact on smoking usage depends on how these increased revenues are spent and whether they become directed at smoking reduction. Cigarette demand is also found to be income inelastic, which implies that the tobacco industry has been growing less rapidly or even declining relative to the rising trend of the per capita disposable personal income in many states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abernathy, A., & Teel, J. E. (1986). Advertising for cigarettes. Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACIR (1987). Cigarette bootlegging: A state and federal responsibility. Washington, DC: Advisory Committee on Intergovernmental Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Perspectives (1978). Congress, states move to curb cigarette bootlegging. Intergovernmental Perspectives, 4(3), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. L., & Franke, G. R. (1991). The determinants of cigarette consumption: A meta–analysis. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., & Skegg, J. L. (1973). Antismoking publicity and the demand for tobacco in the U.K. Manchester Journal of Economics and Social Studies, 41, 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balgati, B. H., & Levin, D. (1986). Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: The effects of bootlegging, taxation, and advertising reconsidered. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1976). An alternative approach to the analysis of taxation. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 1117–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1972). On taxation and the control of externalities. American Economic Review, 62, 307–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. American Economic Review, 84, 396–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 675–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. A., & Yoo, J. H. (1985). Cigarette “health scare,” excise taxes and advertising ban in the cigarette demand and supply. Southern Economic Journal, 52, 402–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R. (1994). U.S. cigarette demand, 1961–1990: Econometric issues, evidence, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 30, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, E. T. (1980). The demand for cigarettes: Further empirical evidence and its implications for public policy. Applied Economics, 12, 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. L. (1972). The demand for cigarettes: Advertising, the health scare, and the cigarette advertising ban. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 401–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. D., & Saba, R. P. (1997). Some limits on taxing sin: Cigarette taxation and health care finance. Southern Economic Journal, 63, 761–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewit, E. M., & Coate, D. (1997). The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking. Journal of Health Economics, 1, 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. G., Keeler, E. B., Newhouse, J. P., & Sloss, E. M. (1991). Excise taxes and demand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (1974). Factors affecting cigarette consumption. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, W. H. (1951). Price policies in the cigarette industry. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, J. (1974). Price and consumption of cigarettes: A case for intervention? British Journal of Preventive Social Medicine, 28, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saba, R. P., Beard, T. R., Ekelund, R. B., & Ressler, R. (1995). The demand for cigarette smuggling. Economic Inquiry, 33, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1972). The economics of advertising. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, C., & Powell, C. P. (1987). Comparison of cigarette and alcohol controversies. Journal of Advertising, 16(2), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teel, S. T., Teel, J. E., & Bearden, W. O. (1979). Lessons learned from the broadcast cigarette advertising ban. Journal of Marketing, 43(1), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, B. R. (1971). The American cigarette industry: A study in economic analysis and public policy. Haydon, CT: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toder, E. J. (1982). The effect of the federal cigarette tax increase on state tax revenues. Proceedings of the Fifty-Sixth Annual Meeting, National Tobacco Tax Association, pp. 13–16.

  • Tollison, R. D., & Wagner, R. E. (1992). The economics of smoking. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education and Human Services (1986). The health consequences of involuntary smoking: A report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC.: Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education and Human Services (1989). Reducing the health consequences of smoking. Rockville, MD: USDHEHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1995). Health consequences of smoking. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1992). Smoking: Making the risk decision. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1995). Cigarette taxation and the social consequences of smoking. In: Tax Policy and the Economy, 9, 51–99. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K. E. (1977). The effects of the anti-smoking campaign on cigarette consumption. American Journal of Public Health, 67, 645–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K. E. (1982). The benefits and costs of anti-smoking policies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Technical Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, G. B., & Vacker, B. (1992). Cigarette advertising and consumption in the United States: 1961–1990. International Journal of Advertising, 11, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sissoko, M. Cigarette Consumption in Different U.S. States, 1955–1998: An Empirical Analysis of the Potential Use of Excise Taxation to Reduce Smoking. Journal of Consumer Policy 25, 89–106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014503610085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014503610085

Keywords

Navigation