Skip to main content
Log in

Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If we are to build human-like robots that can interact naturally with people, our robots must know not only about the properties of objects but also the properties of animate agents in the world. One of the fundamental social skills for humans is the attribution of beliefs, goals, and desires to other people. This set of skills has often been called a “theory of mind.” This paper presents the theories of Leslie (1994) and Baron-Cohen (1995) on the development of theory of mind in human children and discusses the potential application of both of these theories to building robots with similar capabilities. Initial implementation details and basic skills (such as finding faces and eyes and distinguishing animate from inanimate stimuli) are introduced. I further speculate on the usefulness of a robotic implementation in evaluating and comparing these two models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, B., Breazeal, C., Brooks, R., and Scassellati, B. 2000. Humanoid robotics: A new kind of tool. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(4):25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C., Edsinger, A., Fitzpatrick, P., Scassellati, B., and Varchavskaia, P. 2000. Social constraints on animate vision. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(4):32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B. 1999. A context-dependent attention system for a social robot. In 1999 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

  • Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B. 2002. Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caretaker. Adaptive Behavior (to appear).

  • Brooks, R.A., Breazeal (Ferrell), C., Irie, R., Kemp, C.C., Marjanovi?, M., Scassellati, B., and Williamson, M.M. 1998. Alternative essences of intelligence. In Proceedings of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98).

  • Brooks, R.A., Breazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B., and Williamson, M.M. 1999. The Cog project: Building a humanoid robot. In Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents, C.L. Nehaniv (Ed.), Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1562, Springer-Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, G. 1991. The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. In Natural Theories of Mind, A. Whiten (Ed.), Blackwell: Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (Eds.). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

  • Carey, S. 1999. Sources of conceptual change. In Conceptual Development: Piaget's Legacy, E.K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S.A. Gelman, and P.H. Miller (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New York, pp. 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D.L. and Seyfarth, R.M. 1990. How Monkeys See theWorld, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D.L. and Seyfarth, R.M. 1991. Reading minds or reading behavior? Tests for a theory of mind in monkeys. In Natural Theories of Mind, A. Whiten (Ed.), Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.B. and Amsel, G. 1998. Precursors to infants' perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant Behavior and Develoment, 21(4):713–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, I.J. and Hingorani, S.L. 1996. An efficient implementation of Reid's multiple hypothesis tracking algorithm and its evaluation for the purpose of visual tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 18(2):138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. 1987. The Intentional Stance, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J.F. 1976. Infants' recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development, 47:627–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. 1992. A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 44:283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C.D. and Frith, U. 1999. Interacting minds—Abiological basis. Science, 286:1692–1695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. 1990. First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14:79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. and Carey, S. 1998. Building a cognitive creature from a set of primitives: Evolutionary and developmental insights. In The Evolution of Mind, D.D. Cummins and C. Allen (Eds.), Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M.D. 1996. Evolution of Communication, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 20(11):1254–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R., Kasturi, R., and Schunck, B.G. 1995. Machine Vision, McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A., Klima, E., Bellugi, U., Grant, J., and Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Is there a social module? Language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with Williams Syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2):196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A.M. 1982. The perception of causality in infants. Perception, 11:173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A.M. 1984. Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13:287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A.M. 1994. ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michotte, A. 1962. The Perception of Causality, Methuen: Andover, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P. and Sigman, M. 1989. The theoretical implications of joint attention deficits in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 1:173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H.C. 1993. The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33:1937–1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. and Lang, B. 1999. Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9):337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D.J. and Preuss, T.M. 1995. Theory of mind: Evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends in Neuroscience, 18(9):418–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. 1988. "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?" revisited. In Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans, R. Byrne and A. Whiten (Eds.), Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D.B. 1979. An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automated Control, AC-24(6):843–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scassellati, B. 1998. Finding eyes and faces with a foveated vision system. In Proceedings of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98).

  • Sinha, P. 1996. Perceiving and recognizing three-dimensional forms. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13:103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J.M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2):202–238.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scassellati, B. Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot. Autonomous Robots 12, 13–24 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013298507114

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013298507114

Navigation