Abstract
Background: Previous reports have demonstrated that radiofrequency energy delivered to myocardium via an irrigated electrode results in a more voluminous ablation lesion than a non-irrigated electrode. Different irrigated electrode designs have been utilized; no direct comparisons have been reported.
Purpose: To compare different irrigated electrode designs.
Methods: Three irrigation electrode designs were compared to a control (non-irrigated electrode) group: 1. internal; 2. showerhead; 3. sheath. For each electrode, prior to ablation Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the irrigant flow along the electrode outer surface was performed. Ablation was performed in vitro utilizing a whole blood-superfused system. Electrode, electrode–endocardial interface, and intramyocardial temperatures were assessed, as were ablation circuit impedance, total delivered energy, and lesion and electrode morphology. Room temperature normal saline was utilized as the irrigating fluid, delivered at 20 cc/min. Electrode–endocardial interfacial blood flow was assessed at rates of 0 and 0.26 m/s.
Results: Irrigant was contained within the internal electrode design and therefore the electrode outer surface manifested no significant flow during irrigation. Irrigant spread primarily radially away from the showerhead electrode design, yielding relatively high electrode outer surface flow at the irrigation holes, but low elsewhere. Irrigant traveled in parallel to and enveloped the electrode outer surface of the sheath electrode design, yielding relatively moderate but uniform flow.
Ablation via each of the irrigated electrodes yielded greater ablation energy deposition and larger lesion dimensions than the non-irrigated electrode. Irrigation did not necessarily prevent interfacial boiling, which could occur during uninterrupted radiofrequency energy deposition and lesion growth. The results for the 3 irrigation designs were incongruent. The duration of radiofrequency energy application via the internal electrode design was significantly shorter than the other designs, curtailed by impedance rise. This yielded the smallest total radiofrequency energy deposition and smallest ablation lesion volume. Relative to this, duration using the showerhead design was significantly longer, associated with greater total energy deposition and larger lesion volume. The sheath design permitted the longest duration, associated with the largest total energy deposition and lesion volume.
Conclusions: Although each of the irrigated electrode designs yielded larger lesions than the non-irrigated electrode, they were not comparable. Ablation duration and lesion size were directly correlated with flow along the electrode outer surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mittleman RS, Huang SKS, DeGuzman WT, Cuenoud H, Wagshal AB, Pires LA. Use of the saline infusion electrode catheter for improved energy delivery and increased lesion size in radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1022-1027.
Skrumeda LL, Mehra R. Comparison of standard and irrigated radiofrequency ablation in the canine ventricle. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:1196-1205.
Ruffy R, Imran MA, Santel DJ, Wharton JM. Radiofrequency delivery through a cooled catheter tip allows the creation of larger endomyocardial lesions in the ovine heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995;6:1089-1096.
Peterson HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunso S. Tissue temperatures and lesion size Comparison of Irrigated Electrode Designs 399 during irrigated tip catheter radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:8-17.
Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, Arruda M, Wang X, Ohtomo K, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation 1995;91:2264-2273.
Ren J-F, Schwartzman D, Michele JJ, Li KS, Hoffman J, Brode SE, Lighty GW Jr, Dillon SM, Chaudhry FA. Lower frequency (5 MHz) intracardiac echocardiography in a large swine model: imaging views and research applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23(6):871-877.
Petersen HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunso S. Temperature-controlled irrigated tip radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:409-414.
Eick OJ, Gerritse B, Schumacher B. Popping phenomena in temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:253-258.
Schwartzman D, Fischer WD, Spencer EP, Pariszhkaya M, Devine W. Linear radiofrequency atrial lesions deployed using an irrigated electrode: electrical and histologic evolution. Circulation 1998;I-567.
Mirotznik MS, Schwartzman D. Inhomogenous heating patterns of commercial electrodes for radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7:1058-1062.
Panescu D, Whayne JG, Fleischman SD, Mirotznik MS, Swanson DK, Webster JG. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of current density and temperature distributions during radiofrequency ablation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995;42:879-890.
Wong WS, VanderBrink BA, Riley RE, et al. Effect of saline irrigation flow rate on temperature profile during cooled radiofrequency ablation. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 2000;4:321-326.
Schwartzman D, Chang I, Michele JJ, Mirotznik MS, Foster KR. Electrical impedance properties of normal and chronically infarcted left ventricular myocardium. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 1999;3(3):213-224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demazumder, D., Mirotznik, M.S. & Schwartzman, D. Comparison of Irrigated Electrode Designs for Radiofrequency Ablation of Myocardium. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 5, 391–400 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013241927388
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013241927388