Abstract
In order to access and exploit knowledge, MNCs are induced to make FDI in technological districts. It occurs in a two-step process: first joint venture and then acquisition. This perspective is consistent with the evolutionary theory of multinational corporations, which looks at technology transfer as a sound rationale for FDI. The location strategy of multinationals produces a reorganization of district structure and a change in its evolutionary pattern: MNCs become catalysts, bring in new finance, ideas and managerial practices, open the district to external markets and international flows of technology. Biomedical Valley in Italy is a recent high-tech district that fits this picture well. It demonstrates that the rationale for FDI was not wage differentials with parent countries, but rather local knowledge and innovation. Knowledge transfer through subcontractors diffuses and recombines inside the district in two ways: becoming the medium for the dissemination of new codes, procedures and knowledge within the district, and evolving from the role of subcontractors to that of independent producers of final products. The case of biomedical district also induces changes of a number of stereotypes and common beliefs about industrial districts and MNCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, B., 1990, ‘Positive Feedbacks in the Economy’, Scientific American February, 80-85.
Arthur, B., 1994, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Biggiero, L., 1999, ‘Markets, Hierarchies, Networks, Districts: A Cybernetic Approach’, Human Systems Management 16, 71-86.
Biggiero, L., 2000, ‘The Location of Multinationals in Industrial Districts: Theoretical Approaches and Remarks’, Unpublished Paper. http://www.luiss.it/facolta/economia/biggiero.
Biggiero, L. and A. Sammarra, 1999, ‘The Evolution of Italian Industry: A Global Outline’, Economia, Società, Istituzioni 2, 237-273.
Biggiero, L. and A. Sammarra, 2002a, ‘The Biomedical Valley: Structural, Relational, and Social Psychological Aspects’, in F. Belussi, G. Gottardi, and E. Rullani (eds.), The Net Evolution of Local Systems:Knowledge Creation, Collective Learning, and Variety of Institutional Arrangements, Amsterdam: Kluwer. Forthcoming.
Biggiero, L. and A. Sammarra, 2002b, ‘Organizational Identity and Identification Processes. Enriching Theoretical Tools to Study Industrial Districts’, in F. Belussi, G. Gottardi, and E. Rullani (eds.), The Net Evolution of Local Systems: Knowledge Creation, Collective Learning, and Variety of Institutional Arrangements, Amsterdam: Kluwer. Forthcoming.
Bigoness, W.J. and G.L. Blakely, 1996, ‘A Cross-National Study of Managerial Values’, Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 739-752.
Braczyk, H., P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich (eds.), 1997, Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL.
Brusco, S. and E. Righi, 1989, ‘Local Government, Industrial Policy and Social Consensus: The Case of Modena (Italy)’, Economy and Society 18, 405-424.
Brusco, S. and S. Paba, 1997, ‘Per una storia dei distretti industriali italiani dal secondo dopoguerra agli anni novanta’, in F. Barca (ed.), Storia del capitalismo italiano Rome: Donzelli, pp. 265-333.
Cantwell, J.A., 1991, ‘The Theory of Technological Competence and its Application to International Production’, in D. McFetridge (ed.), Foreign Investment, Technology and Economic Growth, Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 31-67.
Cantwell, J.A. and S. Iammarino, 1998, ‘MNCs, Technological Innovation and Regional Systems in the EU: Some Evidence in the Italian Case’, International Journal of the Economics and Business 5 (3), 383-408.
Cooke, P., M.G. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria, 1997, ‘Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimensions’, Research Policy 26, 475-491.
Dunning, J.H., 1993, Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (eds.), 1997, Universities in the Global Economy:A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, London: Cassell Academic.
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff, 2000, ‘The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations’, Research Policy 29, 109-123.
Goodman, E. and J. Bamford (eds), 1989, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London: Routledge.
Grandinetti, R. and E. Rullani, 1997, Impresa transnazionale ed economia globale, Rome: Carocci.
Head K., J. Ries, and K. Ruckman, 1998, ‘Industry Agglomeration and the Location of Foreign Affiliates’, Research in Global Strategic Management 6, 53-85.
Kogut, B., and U. Zander, 1993, ‘Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4), 625-646.
Krugman, P.R., 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lazerson, M.H. and G. Lorenzoni, 1999, ‘The Firms that Feed Industrial Districts: A Return to the Italian Source’, Industrial and Corporate Change 8 (2), 235-266.
Lipparini, A. and A. Lomi, 1999, ‘Interorganizational Relations in the Modena Biomedical Industry: A Case Study in Local Economic Development’, in A. Grandori (ed.), Inter-firm Networks. Organization and Industrial Competitiveness, London: Routledge, pp. 120-150.
Miccoli, G., 1999, ‘The Biomedical District of Mirandola’, in L. Biggiero (ed.), Entrepreneurial Networks:The Construction of Identity as a Self-organizing Process. SOEIS Project. pp. 4-38. http://www.duth/soeis/gr.
Mucchielli, J.L. and P.J. Buckley, 1998, Globalization and Regionalization, Haworth Press.
Mucchielli, J.L., 1998, ‘Multinational Firm Location Strategy. New Directions in International Trade and International Business’, Research in Global Strategic Management 6, 3-28.
Newman, K.L. and S.D. Nollen, 1996, ‘Culture and Congruence: The Fit Between Management Practices and National Culture’, Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 753-780.
Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal, 1997, The Differentiated Network. Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
R&I, 1999, Osservatorio sul settore biomedicale nel distretto mirandolese, Mimeo.
Rullani, E., 1997, ‘Più locale e più globale: verso una economia postfordista del territorio’, in A. Bramanti and M.A. Maggioni (eds.), La dinamica dei sistemi produttivi territoriali: teorie, tecniche, politiche, Milan: Angeli, pp. 85-111.
Sammarra, A. and L. Biggiero, 2001, ‘Identity and Identification in Industrial Districts’, Journal of Management and Governance 5 (1), 61-82.
Sleuwaegen, L., R. Veugelers, and H. Yamawaki, 1998, ‘Comparative and Competitive Advantages: The Performance of the EU in a Global Context’, Research in Global Strategic Management 6, 141-163.
Storper, M., 1992, ‘The Limits to Globalization: Technology Districts and International Trade’, Economic Geography 68, 60-93.
Zander, U. and B. Kogut, 1995, ‘Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities’, Organization Science 6 (1), 76-92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biggiero, L. The Location of Multinationals in Industrial Districts: Knowledge Transfer in Biomedicals. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 111–122 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013156822541
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013156822541