Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wildlife conservation in urban habitats is increasingly important due to current urbanization trends. We review the different approaches to studying birds in urban landscapes, and point out the importance of the habitat island ecological theory as a research framework for the management and conservation of urban birds. Based on two comprehensive research projects conducted at urban parks in Spain (Madrid) and Finland (Oulu and Rovaniemi), several different issues related to bird conservation in cities are discussed, main findings of these projects are presented, and future research needs are suggested. Urban parks are important biodiversity hotspots in cities. Fragmentation conditions have the same deleterious effects to urban birds as in other fragmented landscapes. Park size accounts for species accumulation in urban parks; this pattern being highly nested. Urban parks of 10–35 ha would contain most of the species recorded in cities, but other indicators related to the probabilities of persistence of the target species should be obtained. Wooded streets can increase urban landscape connectivity by providing alternative habitat for feeding and nesting during the breeding season. Because increasing the size of parks is difficult in cities, enhancement of habitat diversity and resource availability for birds within parks (e.g. nest boxes, winter feeding tables, etc.) appears to be a straightforward way of increasing urban bird diversity. However, human disturbance (pedestrians) should be controlled since it can negatively influence many urban birds. We present a conceptual model for urban bird conservation, which includes three aspects (management, environmental education and research) and new alternatives to promote the involvement of different sectors of the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams LW and Dove LE (1989) Wildlife reserves and corridors in the urban environment: a guide to ecological landscape planning and resource conservation. National Institute of Urban Wildlife, Columbia, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich JW and Coffin RW (1980) Breeding bird populations from forest to suburbia after 37 years. American Birds 34: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W and Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W and Patterson BD (1995) Nested temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence absence matrices. AICS Research, University Park, NM and The Field Museum, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten LA (1972) Breeding bird species diversity in relation to increasing urbanization. Bird Study 19: 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger SR and Osborne DR (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 8: 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6: 506–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger DT, Scott TA and Rotenberry JT (1997) Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conservation Biology 11: 406–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P and Burel F (1997) The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution. Landscape and Urban Planning 38: 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Savard J-PL, Mennechez G and Falardeau G (1998) Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100: 413–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SH (1982) Species size distributions of birds and snails in an urban area. In: Bornkamm R, Lee JA and Seaward MRD (eds) Urban Ecology, pp 99–109. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie RJ and Hinsley SA (1987) Breeding success of Blue Tits and Great Tits in suburban gardens. Ardea 75: 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AM and Glick TF (1978) Urban ecosystems and island biogeography. Environmental Conservation 5: 299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker DJ (1990) Implications of the wildlife acceptance capacity concept for urban wildlife management. In: Webb E and Foster SQ (eds) Perspectives in Urban Ecology, pp 45–53. Denver Museum of Natural History and Thorne Ecological Institute, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak DF and Scott Mills L (1994) A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75: 615–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook TG (1999) Population trends of wintering birds around Banbury, Oxfordshire 1975–96. Bird Study 46: 16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JT (1974) An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona. Derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76: 184–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Erz W (1966) Ecological principles in the urbanization of birds. Ostrich Supplement 6: 357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000a) Avifaunal use of linear strips in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology 14: 513–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000b) Local and regional effects of human disturbance on forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Condor 102: 247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000c) Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: the role of age, size, and isolation. Ecological Research 15: 373–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000d) Conservation education: the need for regional approaches supporting local initiatives. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 164–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2001a) Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1303–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (in press) Spatial and temporal distribution of bird forest species in wooded parks in the city of Madrid (Spain). Conservation implications. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2001b) Density dependent habitat selection of corridors in a fragmented landscape. Ibis

  • Fernández-Juricic E and Tellería JL (1999) Recruitment patterns of blackbirds (Turdus merula) in urban fragmented populations. Ardeola 46: 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E and Tellería JL (2000) Effects of human disturbance on Blackbird Turdus merula spatial and temporal feeding patterns in urban parks of Madrid, Spain. Bird Study 47: 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD and Lucas E (2001) Bird tolerance to human disturbance in urban parks of Madrid (Spain). Management implications. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R and Donnelly R (eds) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates JE and Gysel LW (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavareski CA (1976) Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle,Washington. Condor 78: 375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JA, Sutherland WJ and Watkinson AR (1996) A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 786–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles BK (1999) Tree cutting and prunning to benefit urban wildlife. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation, Tucson, Arizona

  • Goode DA (1990) Wildlife in cities. In: Webb E and Foster SQ (eds) Perspectives in Urban Ecology, pp 45–53. Denver Museum of Natural History and Thorne Ecological Institute, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA and Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50: 571–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom DW (1993) Magpie Pica pica predation on Blackbird Turdus merula nests in urban areas. Bird Study 40: 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB, Roth J and Anderson SH (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming Montane Forests. Condor 100: 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM and Baum KA (1999) An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecological Applications 9: 623–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadidian J, Sauer J, Swarth C, Hanly P, Droege S, Williams C, Huff J and Didden G (1997) A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, DC. Urban Ecosystems 1: 87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y and Levins R (1992) Humanity and Nature. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE and Newton I (1995a) Bird species turnover and stochastic extinction in woodland fragments. Ecography 18: 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I and Sparks TH (1995b) Factors influencing the presence of individual bird species in woodland fragments. Journal of Avian Biology 26: 94–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohtola E (1978) Differential changes in bird community structure with urbanization: a study in central Finland. Ornis Scandinavica 9: 94–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Hõrak P (1993) Low fledging success of urban Great Tits. Ornis Fennica 70: 168–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn DJ (1985) Breeding birds of a central Ohio woodlot in response to succession and urbanization. Ohio Journal of Science 85: 34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtalo H and Järvinen O (1977) Quantitative composition of the urban bird community in Tornio, northern Finland. Bird Study 24: 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J (1992) Rovaniemen kaupunkilinnusto (Summary: Effects of urbanization on the structure of breeding bird assemblages in Rovaniemi). Lapin maakuntamuseo, PS-värisuora, Kemi, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J (1996) Patterns of bird communities in urban environments. PhD thesis, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J (1999) Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broadscale variables. Urban Ecosystems 3: 21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J and Suhonen J (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70: 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J and Suhonen J (1998) Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 39: 253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J and Huhta E (2000) Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. Condor 102: 838–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Inki K and Jokinen S (1996) Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland. Journal of Biogeography 23: 379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster RK and Rees WE (1979) Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57: 2358–2368

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy DL and Adams LW (1984) A guide to urban wildlife management. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Luniak M (1983) The avifauna of urban green areas in Poland and possibilities of managing it. Acta Ornithologica (Warszawa) 19: 3–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussenhop J (1977) Urban cemeteries as bird refuges. Condor 79: 456–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J-L and Lepart J (1989) Impoverishment in the bird community of a Finnish archipelago: the role of island size, isolation and vegetation structure. Journal of Biogeography 16: 159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews A, Dickman CR and Major RE (1999) The influence of fragment size and edge on nest predation in urban bushland. Ecography 22: 349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollin D (1998) Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: functional approach. Ecography 21: 247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ and Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an exploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett ST, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM and Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Grove J and Burch Jr WR (1997) A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems 1: 259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison ML, Marcot BG and Mannan RW (1992) Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara Y and Imai C (1996) Spatial structure of avifauna along urban-rural gradients. Ecological Restoration 11: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara Y and Imai C (1999) Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1999a) Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1999b) Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosystems 3: 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Rijsdijk G and Hustings F (1985) Bird communities in small woods in an agricultural landscape: effects of area and isolation. Biological Conservation 34: 333–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD and Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipielagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD and Atmar W (2000) Analyzing species composition in fragments. In: Rheinwald G (ed) Isolated Vertebrate Communities in the Tropics, Proc 4th Int. Symp, pp 1–16. Bonn. zool. Monogr. 46, Bonn

  • Pickett STA, Burch Jr WR, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM and Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1: 185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliainen E (1963) On the history, ecology and ethology of the Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos, L.) overwintring in Finland. Ornis Fennica 40: 45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 4: 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers JA and Smith HT (1997) Buffer zone distances to protect foraging and loafing waterbirds from human disturbance in Florida. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde CLE and Kendle AD (1994) Human well-being, natural landscapes and wildlife in urban areas. A review. English Nature Science No. 22

  • Rolando A, Maffei G, Pulcher C and Guiuso A (1997) Avian community structure along an urbanization gradient. Italian Journal of Zoology 64: 341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DK, Noon BR and Meslow EC (1997) Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. Bioscience 47: 677–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasvári L (1984) Bird abundance and species diversity in the parks and squares of Budapest. Folia Zoologica 33: 249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasvári L and Moskät C (1988) Species richness, bird density and niche shifts in central-European manmade habitats. Ekológia 7: 121–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ and Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvajot RM, Buechner M, Kamradt DA and Schonewald CM (1998) Patterns of human disturbance and response by small mammals and birds in chaparral near urban development. Urban Ecosystems 2: 279–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard J-PL, Clergeau P and Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 659: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley PR (1999) People and nature conservation. The work of the Wildlife Trusts and the Urban Wildlife Partnership in towns and cities in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation, Tucson, Arizona

  • Sodhi NS, Briffett C, Kong L and Yuen B (1999) Bird use linear areas of a tropical city: implications for park connector design and management. Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Wright J, Sorice M and Hill S (1988) Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology 2: 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen J and Jokimäki J (1988) A biogeographical comparison of the breeding bird species assemblages in twenty Finnish urban parks. Ornis Fennica 65: 76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H and Numata M (1995) Foreword. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning, pp VII. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PS, Greenwood JD and Greenaway K (1993) Birds in European gardens in the winter and spring of 1988–89. Bird Study 40: 120–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilghman NG (1987) Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 481–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomialojc L and Profus P (1977) Comparative analysis of breeding bird communities in two parks of Wroclaw and in an adjacent Querco-Carpinetum forest. Acta Ornithologica (Warszawa) 16: 117–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomialojc L (1970) Quantitative studies on the synanthropic avifauna of Legnica and its environs. Acta Ornithologica (Warszawa) 12: 293–392

    Google Scholar 

  • van Balen JH, van Noordwijk AJ and Visser J (1987) Lifetime reproductive success and recruitment in two Great Tit populations. Ardea 75: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp D and Opdam P (1987) Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecology 1: 59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandruff LW, Leedy DL and Stearns FW (1995) Urban wildlife and human well-being. In: Sukopp H, Numata M and Huber A (eds) Urban Ecology as the Basis for Urban Planning, pp 203–211. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard M-A, Trzcinski KM and Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conservation Biology 13: 774–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizyová A (1986) Urban woodlots as islands for land vertebrates: a preliminary attempt on estimating the barrier effects of urban structural units. Ekológia (CSSR) 5: 407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb EA and Foster SQ (1991) Perspectives in urban ecology. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ (1998) Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RJ (2000) Scale, succession and complexity in island biogeography: are we asking the right questions? Global Ecology and Biogeography 9: 75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (1996) World Resources. A Guide to the Global Environment: The Urban Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK

    Esteban Fernández-Juricic

  2. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, 96101, Rovaniemi, Finland

    Jukka Jokimäki

Authors
  1. Esteban Fernández-Juricic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jukka Jokimäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández-Juricic, E., Jokimäki, J. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 2023–2043 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013133308987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013133308987

Search

Navigation