Skip to main content
Log in

Proof, Explanation and Exploration: An Overview

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the role of proof in mathematics education and providesjustification for its importance in the curriculum. It also discusses threeapplications of dynamic geometry software – heuristics, exploration andvisualization – as valuable tools in the teaching of proof and as potentialchallenges to the importance of proof. Finally, it introduces the four papers in this issue that present empirical research on the use of dynamicgeometry software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Atiyah, M., et al.: 1994, ‘Responses to “theoretical mathematics”: Towards a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30(2), 178–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N.: 1997, Preuve: International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, in http://www-didactique.imag.fr/preuve/

  • Barnard, T., et al.: 1996, ‘Teaching proof', Mathematics Teaching 155, 6–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J.: 1991, ‘Visual information and valid reasoning', in W. Zimmerman and S. Cunninghan (eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, The Mathematics Association of America, Washington, pp. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J.: 1996, ‘Heterogeneous logic', in G. Allwain and J. Barwise (eds.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.: 1976, ‘A study of pupils’ proof-explanations in mathematical situations', Educaation Studies in Mathematics 7, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R.: 1999, Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borwein, P. and Jörgenson, L.: 1997, ‘Visible structures in number theory', in http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~loki/Papers/Numbers/node3.html.

  • Cabri Geometry II (computer software).: 1996, Texas Instruments Incorporated.

  • de Villiers, M.: 1990, ‘The role and function of proof in mathematics', Pythagoras 24, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, M.: 1999, Rethinking proof with the Geometer's Sketchpad, Key Curriculum Press, Emeryville, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E.: 1982, ‘Intuition and proof', For the Learning of Mathematics 3(2), 9–18, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G.: 1996, ‘Mathematical visualization: Standing at the crossroads', in http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/projects/PhilVisMath/vis96panel.html

  • Giaquinto, M.: 1994, ‘Epistemology of visual thinking in elementary real analysis', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 789–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.: 1994, ‘Comments on Susanna Epp's chapter', in A. Schoenfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 270–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G.: 1983, Rigorous proof in mathematics education, OISE Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G.: 1990, ‘Some pedagogical aspects of proof', Interchange 21(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. and Jahnke, H.N.: 1996, ‘Proof and proving', in A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and C. Laborde (eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 877–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. and Jahnke, H.N.: 1999, ‘Using arguments from physics to promote understanding of mathematical proofs', in O. Zaslavsky (ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-third conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 3, 73–80. Haifa, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, R.: 1993, ‘Proving is convincing and explaining', Educational Studies in Mathematics 24(4), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. and Quinn, F.: 1993, ‘“Theoretical mathematics”: Towards a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 29(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackiw, N.: 1991, The geometer's sketchpad (computer software), Key Curriculum Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Yu.: 1977, A course in mathematical logic, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Yu.: 1992, ‘Contribution in panel discussion on “The theory and practice of proof”, 1, Proceedings of the seventh International Congress on Mathematical Education (Montreal, Canada).

  • Manin, Yu.: 1998, ‘Truth, rigour, and common sense', in H.G. Dales and G. Oliveri (eds.), Truth in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.: 1991, ‘Questions about geometry', in D. Pimm and E. Love (eds.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Reader, Holder and Stoughton, London, pp. 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM): 1989, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM): 2000, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.: 1994, ‘Structure and ideology in the mathematics curriculum', For the learning of mathematics 14(1), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palais, R.S.: 1999, ‘The visualization of mathematics: Toward a mathematical exploratorium', Notices of the AMS 46(6), 647–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G.: 1957, How to Solve it: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rav, Y.: 1999, ‘Why do we prove theorems?', Philosophia Mathematica 7(3), 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M.A. and Blume, G.W.: 1996, ‘Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers', The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 15, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A.: 1995, ‘Developing a proving attitude', Conference Proceedings: Justifying and Proving in School Mathematics, Institute of Education, University of London, London, pp. 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M.: 1978, ‘Mathematical explanation', Philosophical Studies 34, 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, W.P.: 1994, ‘On proof and progress in mathematics', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30(2), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, E.C. and Müller, G.N.: 1988, ‘When is a proof a proof?', Bulletin of Social Mathematics in Belgium 1, 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.: 1996, ‘The mathematician and the mathematics education reform', Notices of the American Mathematical Society 43(12), 1531–1537.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanna, G. Proof, Explanation and Exploration: An Overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics 44, 5–23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465

Navigation