Abstract
Grain flow measured at the flow sensor in a commercial yield monitoring system is considered to be the convoluted result of grain entering the harvester at one time being mixed by the internal threshing and transport processes with grain entering at other times. A transfer function describing the flow of grain within a conventional combine harvester was used to deconvolve the recorded signal using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT). This process of time series analysis was shown to reposition the yield data in a more accurate manner than the simple time-delay process currently employed. The deconvolution increases the variability in the yield data from 10% to 17% which more closely resembles the variation in crop yield expected from small area samples. The spatial structure of yield variation obtained from small area samples was also shown to be more closely estimated by the deconvoluted data set, however the process does display sensitivity to noise introduced by mechanical/electrical sources and procedural errors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. J. Birrell, S. C. Borgelt, and K. A. Sudduth, Crop yield mapping: comparison ofyield monitors and mapping techniques. In: Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Site-Specific Management for Agricultural Systems, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larson (ASA, Madison 1995) pp. 15–31.
B. C. Boydell, G. Vellidis, C. Perry, D. L. Thomas, J. S. Durrence, and R. W. Vervoort, Deconvolution ofsitespecific yield measurements to address peanut combine dynamics. Transactions of the ASAE 42, 1859–1865 (1996).
C. Chatfield, The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, 5th ed. (Chapman and Hall, London), 283 p.
J. W. Cooley and J. W. Tukey, An algorithm for the machine computation of comlex Fourier series. Math.Comput. 19, 297–301 (1965).
R. M. Lark, J. V. Stafford, and H. C. Bolam, Limitations on the spatial resolution of yield mapping for combinable crops. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66, 183–193 (1997).
J. L. Pringle, M. D. Schrock, R. T. Hinnen, K. D. Howard, and D. L. Oard, Yield variation in grain crops. Paper No, 93-1505, (International Winter Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, ASAE, Michigan, 1993) 10 p.
S. W. Searcy, J. K. Schueller, Y. H. Bae, S. C. Borgelt, and B. A. Stout, Mapping ofspatially variable yield during grain combining. Transactions of the ASAE 32, 826–829 (1989).
J. C. Taylor, G. Thomas, and G. A. Wood, Diagnosing sources ofwithin-field variation with remote sensing. In: Precision Agriculture '97: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by V. Stafford (Bios, London, 1997) pp. 705–712.
J. W. Tukey, Exploratory Data Analysis. (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, 1997) 688 p.
R. Vansichen and J. De Baerdemaeker, (1991). Continuous wheat yield measurement on a combine. In: Automated Agriculture for the 21st Century: Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium. ASAE, Michigan, pp. 346–355.
B. M. Whelan and A. B. McBratney (1997). Sorghum grain flow convolution within a conventional combine harvester. In: Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (Bios, Oxford, England, 1997), pp. 759–766.
B. M. Whelan and A. B. McBratney (1999). A parametric transfer function for grain flow within a conventional combine harvester. Precision Agriculture, Kluwer (not yet published).
R. E. White, A transfer function model for the prediction of nitrate leaching under field conditions. Journal of Hydrology 92, 207–222 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whelan, B.M., McBratney, A.B. An Approach to Deconvoluting Grain-Flow within a Conventional Combine Harvester using a Parametric Transfer Function. Precision Agriculture 2, 389–398 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012356100172
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012356100172