Skip to main content
Log in

The Interfacing of Preservice and Inservice Experiences of Reform-Based Teaching: A Longitudinal Study

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article contrasts four elementary teachers who were graduates of a teacher education program that incorporated a reform-based mathematics methods course. The report provides results from a four-year longitudinal study that extended from the time that the participants were preservice teachers until the end of their second year of teaching. The article provides background information of each teacher, vignettes from her teaching, excerpts from interviews, and an analysis of each teacher's case. Results from the case studies indicate that two of the four teachers sustained their cognitively-based conceptions about mathematics teaching and learning, and implemented these conceptions into practice. The analysis suggests that there were several factors that influenced the teachers' conceptions and the choices they made in their teaching: personal commitment, professional strength, curriculum, planning, assessment, beliefs, knowledge, and support from school administration. The article concludes with implications for teaching and questions about the nature of what might be required in the beginning years of teaching if new teachers are expected to implement reform-based mathematics teaching practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brown, C. A. & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (209–239). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I., Cooney, T. J. & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (636–656). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T. J. & Shealy, B. (1997). On understanding the structure of teachers’ beliefs andtheir relationship to change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (87–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E. & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 306–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D. & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etheridge, C. P. (1989). Acquiring the teacher culture: How beginners embrace practice different from university teachings. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P. & Peterson, P. L. (1987). Mathematics beliefs scales. Studies of the application of cognitive and instructional science to mathematics instruction (National Science Foundation Grant No. MDR-8550236). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. A. & Peterson, P. L. (1991). Learning mathematics with understanding: Cognitively guided instruction. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1975). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1987). Factors in becoming a proactive elementary school teacher: A preliminary study of selected novices. Journal of Education for Teaching, 13, 207–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore, K. & Ross, D. (1993). Following PROTEACH graduates: The fifth year of practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C. (1988). Professional socialization of teachers. In M. J. Dunkin (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). School teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, C. A. & Jaberg, P. A. (1997). Teacher change and mathematics K-4: Developing a theoretical perspective. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers intransition (223–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Liping. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • Nelson, B. S. (1998). Lenses on learning: Administrators’ views on reform and the professional development of teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinczes, E. J. (1995). A remainder of one. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, A. M. & Santos, V. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers and self-reflection: How innovation in mathematics teacher preparation can challenge mathematics beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers’ seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 55–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. F. & Widman, T. F. (1997). Practitioner's research: A study in changing preservice teachers’ conceptions about mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (127–146). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox S., Lanier, Schram, P. & Lappan, G. (1992). Influencing beginning teachers’ practice in mathematics education: Confronting constraints of knowledge, beliefs, and context (Research Report 92 – 1). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steele, D.F. The Interfacing of Preservice and Inservice Experiences of Reform-Based Teaching: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4, 139–172 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011436116480

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011436116480

Keywords

Navigation