Skip to main content
Log in

A Fundamental Approach to Estimating Economies of Scale and Scope of Financial Products: The Case of Mutual Funds

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a ‘Fundamental’ approach to estimate the economies of scale and scope for financial institutions offering multi-product lines. We first estimate pure economies of scale from its fundamental definition, which is the marginal cost reduction that is to be achieved by single product firms of increasing size that offer the same product. Similarly, we estimate the economies of scope from its fundamental definition, as the marginal cost reduction achieved by the addition of a new product line. Operationally, we compare the cost of operating a say, 3 product-line financial institution with the cost of operating a portfolios of companies that are synthetically created from a control sample of financial institutions offering fewer, such as 2 and 1 similar product lines. When this approach is applied to mutual funds data, we find economies of scale for some fund type. The evidence on marginal cost economies due to increasing scope is rather weak. The results have practical implications for potential organizers and current management of investment companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W. J., J. C. Panzar and R. D. Wilig, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., S. M. Goldfeld, L. A. Gordon and M. F. Koehn, The Economics of Mutual Fund Markets: Competition versus Regulation, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., D. Hancock and D. B. Humphrey, “Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 317–347, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., G. A. Hanweck and D. B. Humphrey, “Competitive Viability in Banking: Scale, Scope and Product Mix Economies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 501–520, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey, “The Dominance of Inefficiencies Over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking.” Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117–148, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., W. C. Hunter and S. G. Timme, “The Efficiency of Financial Institutions: A Review and Preview of Research Past, Present and Future.” Journal of Banking and Finance April, 221–249, (1993).

  • Clark, J. A., “Economies of Scale and Scope at Depository Institutions: A Review of the Literature.” Economic Review, FRBKC September/October, 16–33, (1988).

  • Dermine, J. and L. Roller, “Economies of Scale and Scope in French Mutual Funds.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 283–293, (1992).

  • Evans, D. S. and J. J. Heckman, “A Test for Subaddivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System.” American Economic Review 74, 615–623, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G. D., S. Grosskopf, K. J. Hayes and S. Yaisawarng, “Economies of Diversification in the Banking Industry.” Journal of Monetary Economies 3, 229–249, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, S. P. and D. M. Chance, “The Effect of 12b-1 Plans on Mutual Fund Expense Ratios: A Note.” Journal of Finance 1077–1082, (1987).

  • Goldberg, L. G., G. Hanweck, G. A. Keenan and A. Young, “Economies of Scale and Scope in the Securities Industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 91–107, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. Y., “Economies of Scale and Scope in Multiproduct Financial Institutions: Further Evidence from Credit Union.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18, May, 220–226, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, J. A., Schleifer and R. Vishny, “The Structure and Performance of the Money Management Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 339–391, (1992).

  • McAllister, P. H. and D. A. McManus, “Resolving the Scale Efficiency Puzzle in Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 389–405, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L. J., “Efficiency in the Savings and Loan Industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 267–286, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthi, B. P. S., Y. Choi and P. Desai, “Efficiency of Mutual Funds and Portfolio Measurement: A Non-parametric Approach.” European Journal of Operations Research 98, 404–418, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulley, L. and D. B. Humphrey, “The Role of Fixed Costs and Cost Complementarities in Determining Scope Economies and the Cost of Narrow Banking Proposals.” Journal of Business July, 437–462, (1993).

  • Roller, L., “Modelling Cost Structure: The Bell System Revisited.” Applied Economics 22, 1661–1674, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roller, L. H., “Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System.” Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 202–210, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ang, J.S., Lin, J.W. A Fundamental Approach to Estimating Economies of Scale and Scope of Financial Products: The Case of Mutual Funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 16, 205–222 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011232319447

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011232319447

Navigation