Abstract
Designation of historic properties and historic districts is increasingly used as a means to revive central-city neighborhoods and to promote urban economic development. While preservation activities are thought to generate positive externalities for surrounding neighborhoods, these external effects have been difficult to quantify. Using a database of tax-appraisal records for residential properties in Abilene, Texas, this study demonstrates that there are significant, positive externalities associated with historic designation. We perform simple cost-benefit calculations and find that the internal and external benefits more than outweigh the (nonzero) costs associated with historical designation. Moreover, from the city of Abilene's perspective the property-tax incentives provided to historic reinvestment are outweighed by the added property-tax revenue created by the increased value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asabere, P. K., and F. Huffman. (1994a). “Historic Designation and Residential Market Values,” Appraisal Journal 62, 396–401.
Asabere, P. K., and F. Huffman. (1994b). “The Value Discounts Associated with Historic Facçade Easements,” Appraisal Journal 62, 270–277.
Asabere, P. K., and F. Huffman. (1991). “Historic Districts and Land Values,” Journal of Real Estate Research 6, 1–8.
Asabere, P. K., F. E. Huffman, and Seyed Mehdian. (1994). “The Adverse Impacts of Local Historic Designation: The Case of Small Apartment Buildings in Philadelphia,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 8, 225–234.
Clark, D. E, and W. E. Herrin. (1997). “Historical Preservation and Home Sale Prices: Evidence from the Sacramento Housing Market,” Review of Regional Studies 27, 29–48.
Coulson, N. E., and E. Bond. (1990). “A Hedonic Approach to Residential Succession,” Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 433–444.
Ford, D. (1989). “The Effect of Historic District Designation on Single-Family Home Prices,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 17, 353–362.
Goodman, A., and T. Thibodeau. (1995). “Age Related Heteroskedasticity in Hedonic House Price Equations,” Journal of Housing Research 6.1, 25–42.
Kanemoto, Y. (1988). “Hedonic Prices and the Benefits of Public Projects,” Econometrica 56, 981–993.
Listokin, D., B. Listokin, and M. Lahr. (1999). “The Contributions of Historic Preservation to Housing and Economic Development,” Housing Policy Debate 9.3, 431–478.
Lockhard, W. F., Jr., and D. Hinds. (1983). “Historic Zoning Considerations in Neighborhood and District Analysis,” Appraisal Journal 51, 485–497.
Rypkema, D. D. (1994). The Economics of Historic Preservation: A Community Leader's Guide. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Schaeffer, P. V., and C. Millerick. (1991). “The Impact of Historic District Designation on Property Values: An Empirical Study,” Economic Development Quarterly 5, 301–312.
Scotchmer, S. (1986). “The Short-Run and Long-Run Benefits of Environmental Improvement,” Journal of Public Economics 30, 61–81.
Slaughter, H. B., Jr. (1997). “Integrating Economic Development and Historic Preservation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,” Historic Preservation Forum 11, 41–44.
Texas Historical Commission, et al. (1999). “Historic Preservation at Work for the Texas Economy,” Unpublished report.
Wagner, R. D. (1993). “Urban Downtown Revitalization,” Historic Preservation Forum 7, 53.
White, H. (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica 48, 817–838.
Wojno, C. T. (1991). “Historic Preservation and Economic Development,” Journal of Planning Literature 5, 296–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coulson, N.E., Leichenko, R.M. The Internal and External Impact of Historical Designation on Property Values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 23, 113–124 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011120908836
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011120908836