Skip to main content
Log in

RAPD marker polymorphism among commercial winery yeast strains

  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was employed to characterize commercial winery yeast strains currently used in Brazilian industries and to examine the relationship between them. Sixteen strains were subjected to RAPD analysis using eight primers, selected from the 40 primers of the kits B and X of Operon Techn. From the total of 93 scorable bands, 39 (41.9%) were polymorphics. Using the accumulated information of several reactions, all strains under investigation were differentiated. Cluster analysis revealed three groups. Most of the strains (11) were clustered in one group. The highest distance (28%) was obtained with the strain Redstar (Universal Food Corp.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barros Lopes, M., Soden, A., Henschle, P.A. & Landridge, P. 1996 PCR differentiation of commercial yeast strains using intron splice site primers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62, 4514-4520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodin, B. & Vezinhet, F. 1988 Identification de souches de levures oenologiques parleurs caryotypes obtenus en électrophorése en champ pulsé. Revue Française de Oenologie 28, 7-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.G. & Lanignan, M.S. 1993 Prospects for estimating nucleotide divergence with RAPDs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 1096-1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degrée, R., Thomas, D.Y., Ash, J., Mailhiot, K., Morin, A. & Dubor,C. 1989 Wine yeasts strain identification. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 40, 309-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverrigaray, S., Tavares, F.C.A., Lavi, U., Gal, O. & Hillel, J. 1995 Minisatellite probes in yeast DNA fingerprinting. Revista Brasileira de Microbiologia 25, 207-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, C. & Fink, G.R. 1991 Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, ISBN 0-12-310670-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, G.M. & Fleet, G.H. 1986 Occurrence and growth of yeast species during the fermentation of some Australian wines. Food Technology Australia 38, 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, J.L., Craneguy, B., Zucca, J. & Poulard, A. 1992. Authentication of ATCC strains in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae complex by PCR fingerprinting. Experimental Mycology 16, 316-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavallée, F., Salvas, Y., Lamy, S., Thomas, D.Y., Degrée, R. & Dulau, L. 1994 PCR and DNA fingerprinting used as a quality control in the production of wine yeast strains. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 45, 86-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodder, J. 1970 The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North-Holland Publishing ISBN 0-7204-4054-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, J.M., Eckstein, P.E., Scoles, G.J. & Gajadahar, A.A. 1993 Variability of random amplified polymorphic DNA assay among thermal cyclers, and effects of primer and DNA concentration. Molecular and Cellular Probes 7, 293-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaden, P. 1990 DNA fingerprinting of brewers' yeast: current perspectives. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 96, 195-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadal, D., Colomber, B. & Piña, B. 1996 Molecular polymorphism distribution in phenotypically distinct populations of wine yeast strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62, 1944-1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaina, J. & Adams, A.C. 1991 A fast procedure for yeast DNA purification. Nucleic Acids Research 19, 5443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Querol, A., Barrio, E., Huerta, T. & Ramón, D. 1992 Molecular monitoring of wine fermentations conducted by active dry yeast strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 2948-2953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada, M.P. & Cenis, J.L. 1995 Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD-PCR) in the characterization of wine yeasts. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 46, 204-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankine, B.C. 1968 The importance of yeasts in determining the composition and quality of wines. Vitis 7, 22-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J. 1992 NTSYS-PC: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. New York: Exeter Softeware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritch, E.F. & Maniatis, T. 1989 Molecular Cloning: Laboratory Manual. 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. ISBN 0-87969-309-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, M. & Garner, J. 1993 Analysis of yeast diversity during spontaneous and induced alcoholic fermentation. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 75, 551-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J. & Hillis, D.M. 1996 Phylogenetic inference. In Molecular Systematics, eds. Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B.K., pp. 407-514. Massachussetts: Sinauer Ass. ISBN 0-87893-282-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versavaud, A., Courcoux, P., Roulland, C., Dulau, L. & Hallet, J.N. 1995 Genetic diversity and geographical distribution of wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from the wine-producing are of Carentes, France. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3521-3529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezinhet, F., Blondin, B. & Hallet, J.N. 1990 Chromosomal DNA patterns and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism as tools for identification of enological strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 32, 568-571.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Echeverrigaray, S., Paese-Toresan, S. & Carrau, J. RAPD marker polymorphism among commercial winery yeast strains. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 16, 143–146 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008993129713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008993129713

Navigation