Abstract
Two low-mercury amalgams: (1) low-copper lathe-cut and (2) high-copper (Tytin) were prepared by amalgamation with liquid Hg–47.4% In alloy. The strength–structure relationship of these amalgams was investigated and compared with standard amalgams (i.e. amalgams prepared with the same powders and pure mercury). The matrix phase of the low-mercury amalgam was found to be depleted of mercury and may be thought of as In4Ag9 compound with some mercury dissolved, indicating that less mercury (compared with standard amalgam) combines with silver, thus producing a strong amalgam matrix. On the other hand, an increase was observed in the consumption of the initial γ (Ag3Sn)-phase, leading to an increase of the tin released. As a result, the potential of [HgSn]-phase formation in low-mercury amalgams increases. The observed increase in the quantity of γ2(Sn7–8Hg)-phase in low-copper amalgam, or its appearance in high-copper amalgam (where it is normally absent), contributes to a deterioration in the strength of the investigated amalgam. The conclusion drawn was that low-mercury amalgam may be prepared with liquid Hg–47.4%In alloy but, in order to eliminate γ2-phase formation, novel and possibly tin-free amalgamable alloys should be developed. © 1998 Chapman & Hall
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. A. Cochran and E. S. Duke, J. Indiana. Dent. Assoc. 60 (1981) 2.
T. B. Massalsky (ed.), in “Binary Alloys Phase Diagrams”, Vol. 3, 2nd Edn (ASM International, 1992) pp. 2130, 2132, 2133.
W. V. Youdelis, inventor, “Dental powder composite and amalgam”, US Pat. 4039 329, 2 August (1977).
Idem., in “Advanced Materials and Processes”, Proceedings of the First European Conference EUROMAT 89, Vol. 2, “High Technology Applications, Interfaces and Related Topics”, edited by K. E. Exner and V. Schumacher (DGM Informationsgesellschaft, Olerursel, 1990) p. 785.
L. V. Powell, G. H. Johnson and D. J. Bales, J. Dent. Res. 68 (1989) 1231.
T. Okabe, T. Yamashita, H. Nakajima, A. Berglund, L. Zhao, I. Guo and J. L. Ferracane, J. Dent. Res. 73 (1994) 1711.
W. V. Youdelis, J. Canad. Dent. Assoc. 2 (1979) 64.
H. J. Mueller and E. M. Narea, in “Transactions of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials”, San Diego, April 1985, p. 59.
H. Hero, R. B. Jorgensen and L. Shuiping, J. Dent. Res. 73, IDAR Abstracts, abst. 29 (1994) 105.
G. H. Johnson and L. V. Powell, Dent. Mater. 8 (1992) 366.
H. Hero, R. B. Jorgensen and L. Shuiping, Biomaterials 16 (1995) 581.
G. Wing, Austral. Dent. J. 4 (1965) 113.
C. W. Fairhurst and J. B. Cohen, Acta Crystallogr. B28 (1972) 371.
C. W. Fairhurst and G. Ryge, Adv. X-ray Anal. 5 (1962) 64.
D. B. Mahler and J. D. Adey, J. Dent. Res. 54 (1975) 218.
T. B. Massalsky (ed.), in “Binary Alloys Phase Diagrams”, Vol. 2, 2nd Edn (ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, 1992) 1481.
D. B. Mahler and J. D. Adey, J. Dent. Res. 63 (1984) 921.
T. Lyman, (ed.), “Metals Handbook”, Vol. 1, 8th Edn (ASM, Metals Park, 1964) p. 44.
T. B. Massalsky (ed.), in “Binary Alloys Phase Diagrams”, Vol. 1, 2nd Edn (ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, 1992) p. 43.
Idem, ibid., Vol. 3, p. 2168.
K. J. Soderholm, J. Dent. Res. 3 (1987) 713.
N. K. Sarkar, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 5 (1994) 171.
K. Matsuda, H. Ohmo, T. Hamawa, J. L. Ferracame, R. Spears and T. Okabe, J. Dent. Res. 66, IDAR Abstracts, abst. 1469 (1986) 290.
S. L. Jensen, Scan. J. Dent. Res. 80 (1972) 158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, A., Kaufman, A. Structure and strength of low-mercury dental amalgams prepared with liquid Hg–47.4% In alloy. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 9, 347–354 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008807014747
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008807014747