Skip to main content
Log in

Representing Law in Partial Information Structures

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new language for isomorphic representations of legalknowledge in feature structures. The language includes predefinedstructures based on situation theory for common-sense categories, andpredefined structures based on Van Kralingen‘s (1995) frame-based conceptualmodelling language for legal rules. It is shown that the flexibility of thefeature-structure formalism can exploited to allow for structure-preservingrepresentations of non-primitive concepts, and to enable various types ofinteraction and cross-reference between language elements. A fragment of theDutch Opium Act is used to illustrate how modelling and reasoning proceed in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït-Kaci, H. (1985). A New Model of Computations Based on a Calculus of Type Subsumption. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. (1989). The Situation in Logic. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench-Capon, T.J.M. & Coenen, F.P. (1992). Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1(1): 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench-Capon, T.J.M. & Forder, J. (1991). Knowledge Representation for Legal Applications. In T.J.M. Bench-Capon (ed.) Knowledge-Based Systems and Legal Applications, 245–262. Academic Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Robinson, G.O., Routen, T.W. & Sergot, M.J. (1987). Logic Programming for Large Scale Applications in Law: A Formalisation of the Supplementary Benefit Legislation. In Proceedings of The First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 190–198. Association for Computing Machinery: Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R. & Schmolze, J. (1985). An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science 9: 171–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin K.J. (1991). Logic and Information. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpf, J. (1989). Quality Assurance of Legal Expert Systems. In Preproceedings of the Third International Conference on “Logica, Informatica, Diritto”, 411–440. Florence.

  • Keller, B. (1993). Feature Logic, Infinitary Descriptions and Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes, Vol. 44. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (1991). General Theory of Norms. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kralingen, R.W. (1995). Frame-Based Conceptual Models of Statute Law. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leiden. Kluwer Law International: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kralingen, R.W., Oskamp, E.W. & Reurings, E.R. (1993). Norm Frames in the Representation of Laws. In Svensson, J.S., Wassink, J.G.J. & van Bruggenhout, B. (eds.) Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Intelligent Tools for Drafting Legislation, Computer-Supported Comparison of Law, 11–21. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, L.T. (1989). A Language for Legal Discourse. In Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 180–189. Association for Computing Machinery: Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1974). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 306, MIT, AI Laboratory. Also in Brachman, R.J. & Levesque, H.J. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation, 245–262. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA.

  • Peek, N.B. (1995). Structure-Preserving Representations of Complex References. In Hage, J.C., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Cohen, M.J. & van den Herik, H.J. (eds.) Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Telecommunication and AI & Law, 95–104. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C. & I.A. Sag (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Volume 1: Fundamentals. CSLI Lecture Notes, Vol. 13. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. & Schrickx, J. (1991). Isomorphic Models for Rules and Exceptions in Legislation. In Breuker, J.A., de Mulder, R.V. & Hage, J.C. (eds.) Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Model-based Legal Reasoning, 17–27. Koninklijke Vermande: Lelystad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rounds, W.C. & Kaspar, R. (1986). A Complete Logical Calculus for Record Structures Representing Linguistic Information. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 34–43.

  • Routen, T.W. & Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (1991). Hierarchical Formalizations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S. (1986). An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI Lectures Notes, Vol. 4. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, A. (1995). Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modelling Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam. IOS Press: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, P.R.S. (1995). Knowledge Specification for Multiple Legal Tasks; A Case Study of the Interaction Problem in the Legal Domain, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leiden. Kluwer Law International: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G.H. (1963). Norm and Action; A Logical Enquiry. International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peek, N. Representing Law in Partial Information Structures. Artificial Intelligence and Law 5, 263–290 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008238332032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008238332032

Navigation