Abstract
We survey the history of carbon taxation, the range of market-based instruments (MBIs) of environmental control, and the state of the double dividend debate, in order to suggest directions for future research into MBIs. Returning MBI revenues as lower distortionary taxes rather than as lump sums raises aggregate welfare, but we favour MBIs which raise little or no revenue, for reasons of political acceptability to interest groups. At the same time, the overall case for any environmental improvement is weaker because of general equilibrium interactions with prior distortionary taxes. Research seems most necessary on quantifying the efficiency benefits of market control of heterogeneous polluters, the benefits of environmental improvement, the tax interaction effect, and the various information costs of an MBI, all on a case-by-case basis for different pollutants and places.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boskin, M. J. and E. Sheshinski (1978), ‘Optimal Redistributive Taxation when Individual Welfare Depends upon Relative Income’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 92, 589–601.
Bovenberg, A. L. (1997), ‘Environmental Policy, Distortionary Labour Taxation and Employment: Pollution Taxes and the Double Dividend’, in C. Carraro and D. Siniscalco, eds., New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1994a), ‘Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation’, American Economic Review 94(4), 1085–1089.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1994b), ‘Environmental Policy in a Small Open Economy with Distortionary Labour Taxes: A General Equilibrium Analysis’, in E. C. van Ierland, ed., International Environmental Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1994c), ‘Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth’, Center for Economic Research Discussion Paper 9498. Netherlands: Tilburg.
Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1997), ‘Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Public Economics 63, 207–237.
Bovenberg, A. L. and L. H. Goulder (1996), ‘Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses’, American Economic Review 86(4), 985–1000.
Carraro, C., M. Galeotti and M. Gallo (1996), ‘Environmental Taxation and Unemployment: Some Evidence on the Double Dividend Hypothesis in Europe’, Journal of Public Economics 62, 141–181.
Cramton, P. and S. Kerr (1997), ‘A Tax-Cut Auction for the Environment: How and Why to Auction CO2 Emission Permits’, typescript, Department of Economics, University of Maryland, USA.
de Mooij, R. A. (1998), ‘The Double Dividend of an Environmental Tax Reform’, in J. van den Bergh, ed., Handbook of Environmental Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming.
Downing, P. B. and L. J. White (1986), ‘Innovation in Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13(1), 18–29.
EEA (European Environment Agency) (1996), Environmental Taxes: Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Fullerton, D. and T. C. Kinnaman (1996), ‘Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag’, American Economic Review 86(4), 971–984.
Goulder, L. H. (1992), ‘Do the Costs of a Carbon Tax Vanish when Interactions with Other Taxes are Accounted For?’ National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 4061.
Goulder, L. H. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader's Guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 2(2), 157–183.
Goulder, L. H. (1997), ‘Environmental Taxation in a Second-Best World’, in H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg, eds., The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1997/1998. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Goulder, L. H., I. W. H. Parry and D. Burtraw (1997), ‘Revenue-Raising vs. Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Pre-Existing Tax Distortion’, Rand Journal of Economics 28(4), 708–731.
Hahn, R. W. (1989), ‘Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor's Orders’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2), 95–114.
Joskow, P. and R. Schmalensee (1997), ‘The Political Economy of Market-Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program’, Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming).
Majocchi, A. (1996), ‘Green Fiscal Reform and Employment: A Survey’, Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 375–397.
Mayeres, I. and S. Proost (1997), ‘Optimal Tax and Public Investment Rules for Congestion Type of Externalities’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99(2), 261–279.
Nielsen, S. B., L. H. Pedersen and P. B. Sorensen (1995), ‘Environmental Policy, Pollution, Unemployment, and Endogenous Growth’, International Tax and Public Finance 2(2), 185–205.
Park, A. and J. Pezzey (1998), ‘Variations on the Wrong Themes? A Structured Review of the Double Dividend Debate’, in T. Sterner, ed., Environmental Implications of Market-Based Policy Instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Pearce, D. (1991), ‘The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming’, The Economic Journal 101, 938–948.
Pezzey, J. (1988), ‘Market Mechanisms of Pollution Control: “Polluter Pays”, Economic and Practical Aspects’, in R. K. Turner, ed., Sustainable Environmental Management – Principles and Practice. London: Belhaven Press.
Pezzey, J. (1992a), ‘The Symmetry Between Controlling Pollution by Price and Controlling it by Quantity’, Canadian Journal of Economics 25(4), 983–991.
Pezzey, J. (1992b), ‘Some Interactions Between Environmental Policy and Public Finance’, Department of Economics, University of Bristol Discussion Paper 92/340.
Pigou, A. C. (1920), The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
Powell, J. and A. Craighill (1997), ‘The UK Landfill Tax’, in T. O’Riordan, ed., Ecotaxation. London: Earthscan.
Proost, S. and D. van Regemorter (1995), ‘The Double Dividend and the Role of Inequality Aversion and Macroeconomic Regimes’, International Tax and Public Finance 2, 207–219.
Sandmo, A. (1975), ‘Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities’, Swedish Journal of Economics 77, 86–98.
Schob, R. (1996), ‘Evaluating Tax Reform in the Presence of Externalities’, Oxford Economic Papers 48(4), 537–555.
Spackman, M. (1997), ‘Hypothecation: A View from the Treasury’, in T. O’Riordan, ed., Ecotaxation. London: Earthscan.
Stavins, R. N. (1997), ‘What Can we Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Positive and Normative Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading’, Journal of Economic Perspectives (forthcoming).
Sterner, T. and L. Hoglund (1998), ‘Refunded Emission Payments: A Hybrid Instrument with some Attractive Properties’, in T. Sterner, ed., Environmental Implications of Market-Based Policy Instruments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Terkla, D. (1984), ‘The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11(2), 107–123.
Tullock, G. (1967), ‘Excess Benefit’, Water Resources Research 3(2), 643–644.
Vollebergh, H. R. J., J. L. de Vries and P. R. Koutstaal (1997), ‘Hybrid Carbon Incentive Mechanisms and Political Acceptability’, Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 43–63.
von Weizsacker, E. U., and J. Jesinghaus (1992), Ecological Tax Reform: A Policy Proposal for Sustainable Development. London: Zed Books.
Whalley, J. and R. Wigle (1991), ‘The International Incidence of Carbon Taxes’, in R. Dornbusch and J. Poterba, eds., Economic Policy Responses to Global Warming. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pezzey, J.C., Park, A. Reflections on the Double Dividend Debate. Environ Resource Econ 11, 539–555 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008216524348
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008216524348