Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Approach to Annual Assessment and Evaluation of University Faculty

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach used to determine some university faculty annual raises is described. Faculty assessment information is covered first. Tabular summaries made from this information are also described. Then the annual evaluation procedure carried out by a faculty review team and the department head are described. The method used to determine faculty raise allocations is presented. Difficulties and limitations of the approach are mentioned throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braskamp, L.A., & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J.M., & Bayer, A.E. (1986). Assessing Faculty Scholarly Performance. In J.W. Creswell (Ed.), Measuring Faculty Research Performance (pp. 25-42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R.C., Gibbs, M.C., & Masters, R.J. (1988). The Finite Increment Faculty Merit Pay Allocation Model. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 652-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1998). Reflective Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (Ed.) (1986). Measuring Faculty Research Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M., & Adam, B.E. (Eds.) (1993). Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froh, R.C., Gray, P.J., & Lambert, L.M. (1993). Representing faculty work: The professional portfolio. In R.M. Diamond & B.E. Adam (Eds.), Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D. (1989). Using Citation Counts as a Measure of Quality in Science: Measuring what’s Measurable Rather than what’s Valid. Scientometrics, 15, 21-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A.F. (1994). Strengthening Departmental Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J.E. (1986). Predictors of Faculty Dissatisfaction with an Annual Performance Evaluation. Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 37, 13-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P. (1993). How Colleges Evaluate Professors: 1983 v. 1993. AAHE Bulletin, 46(2), 6-8, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R.K. (1998). Using Regression Analysis to Determine if Faculty Salaries are Compressed. Research in Higher Education, 39, 87-100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, USA

    Carl J Huberty

Authors
  1. Carl J Huberty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huberty, C.J. An Approach to Annual Assessment and Evaluation of University Faculty. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14, 241–251 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008192015069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008192015069

Keywords

Search

Navigation