Skip to main content
Log in

The New Philosophy of Science and Its Lessons

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bloor, David: 1991 [1976], Knowledge and Social Imagery, second edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, J. and J. Woodward: 1988, 'Saving the Phenomena', Philosophical Review 97, 303-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M.: 1980, 'Models, Metaphors, and Scientific Realism', Nature and System 2, 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M.: 1980, 'The Metaphorical Character of Science', Philosophia Naturalis 21, 229-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D. J.: 1986, 'Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and Evolution: A Philosophical Perspective', Philosophica 37(l).

  • Dupré, J.: 1993, The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Alan: 1980, Forms of Explanation, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1984, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E.: 1971. Physical Science in the Middle Ages, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M.: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S.: 1993, In the Wake of Chaos, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1999, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and S. Woolgar: 1979, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961,. The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., A. Megill and D. McCloskey: 1987, The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1999, Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S.: 1982, 'History of Science and its Social Reconstructions', History of Science 20, 157-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Steven: 1991, Dreams of a Final Theory, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L.: 1982, Better Reasoning, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Depew, D. The New Philosophy of Science and Its Lessons. Argumentation 15, 9–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007840429630

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007840429630

Navigation