Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of United States' Utility Conservation Programs

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the United States' experience with utility sponsored energy conservation programs. Such programs are central to the recent discussions about electric utility regulation in the United States and elsewhere. First it is shown that these programs are exposed to three problems on the consumers' side – rebound, adverse selection and moral hazard – which lower the effectiveness of conservation incentives and impede in most practical cases a reliable quantification of the achieved conservation. Moreover, the utilities have under the regulatory practice an incentive to invest in conservation measures but to limit factual conservation through a proper design of the program. Reviewing the recent literature shows that these four crucial points, which affect many of the applied conservation programs, are either insufficiently covered (rebound and adverse selection) or neglected entirely (moral hazard and regulated utilities' interest in little conservation). We conclude, that this undertaking has resulted in insignificant conservation and doubt the adequacy of these programs to reduce external social costs from energy use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1970) 'The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 488-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwait, St., and D. Caves (1994) 'Three Biases in Cost-Efficiency Tests of Utility Conservation Programs', Energy Journal, 15(1), 95-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Maine Power (1994) Energy Management Report 1993.

  • Cicchetti, Ch. J., and W. W. Hogan (1989) 'Including Unbundled Demand Side Options in Electric Utility Bidding Programs', Public Utilities Fortnightly, 8 June, pp. 9-20.

  • Clarke, R. A. (1994) 'The Challenge of Going Green', The Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 37-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck (1994) Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J., A. K. Miedema, and R. V. Chandran (1986) 'Price Effects of Energy-Efficient Technologies: A Study of Residential Demand for Heating and Cooling', The Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 310-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRI 1993a, (May 1993) 1992 Survey of Utility Demand-Side Management Programs. Vols. 1 and 2. EPRI TR-102193.

  • EPRI 1993b, (August 1993) Principles and Practice of Demand-Side Management. EPRI TR-102556.

  • Eto, J., E. Vine, L. Shown, R. Sonnenblick, and C. Payne (1994) 'The Cost and Performance of Utility Commercial Lighting Programs', LBL-Report 34967. Berkeley.

  • Fickett, A. P., C. W. Gellings, and A. B. Lovins (1990) 'Efficient Use of Electricity', Scientific American (September), pp. 65-74.

  • Fox-Penner, P. (1990) 'Cogeneration after PURPA: Energy Conservation and Industry Structure', The Journal of Law and Economics, XXIII, 517-552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Power (1993) Energy Efficiency Programs 1993.

  • Gilbert, R., and St. Stoft (1992) 'A Review and Analysis of Electric Utility Conservation Incentives', POWER-Program on Workable Energy Regulation, PWP-005.

  • Greene, D. L. (1992) 'Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How Big Is the “Rebound” Effect?', The Energy Journal, 13(1), 117-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1979) 'Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables', Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 33-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek von, F. (1945) 'The Use of Knowledge in Society', American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. (1989) 'Reaching for 100% Participation in a Utility Conservation Programme, The Hood River Project', Energy Policy, 155-164.

  • Hirst, E., and J. Reed, eds. (1991) Handbook of Evaluation of Utility DSM Programs. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  • Hirst, E., and C. Sabo (1992) 'Defining and Reporting Data on Utility DSM Programs', Energy, 17(7), 635-647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. (1992) 'Price and Cost Impacts of Utility DSM Programs', The Energy Journal, 13(4), 75-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E. (1994) 'What Constitutes a Good Integrated Resource Plan?', Utilities Policy, 4(2), 141-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B. F. (1991) 'The 'Most Value' Test: Economic Evaluation of Electricity Demand-Side Management Considering Customer Value', The Energy Journal, 12(2), 67-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idaho Power (1993) 'Conservation Plan'.

  • Joskow, P. L., and D. B. Marron (1992) 'What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs', The Energy Journal, 13(4), 41-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L., and St. Shavell (1994) 'Accuracy in the Determination of Liability', Journal of Law and Economics, XXVII, 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. (1994) 'The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economic Analysis', The Journal of Legal Studies, XXIII, 307-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazzoom, D. J. (1989) 'Energy Savings from More Efficient Appliances: A Rejoinder', The Energy Journal, 10, 157-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. R., and D. E. M. Sappington (1992) 'Incentives for Conservation and Quality Improvement by Public Utilities', American Economic Review, 82, 1321-1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. (1985) 'Saving Gigabucks with Negawatts', Public Utilities Fortnightly 115/6, pp. 19-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, A. M., and J. Sicilian (1987) 'Direct Investment in Conservation Measures by a Public Utility', The Energy Journal, 8(2), 137-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Electric (1992) '1991 DSM Performance Measurement Report'.

  • Massachusetts Electric (1993) '1992 DSM Performance Measurement Report'.

  • Massachusetts Electric (1994) '1993 DSM Performance Measurement Report'.

  • Nadel, St. (1990a) Lessons Learned: A Review of Utility Experience with Conservation and Load Management Programs for Commercial and Industrial Customers, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy: 1064-EEED-AEP-88, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, St. (1990b) 'Electric Utility Conservation Programs: A Review of the Lessons Taught by a Decade of Programs Experience', Proceedings from the ACEEE 1990 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Building, Vol. 8: Utility Programs, Washington, DC: ACEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, St., B. Atkinson, and J. McMahon (1993) 'A Review of U.S. and Canadian Lighting Programs for the Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors', Energy, 18, 145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (1992) 'Annual Evaluation Report 1991 Demand Side Management Program'.

  • Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (1993) 'Annual Evaluation Report 1992 Demand Side Management Program'.

  • Nichols, A. (1994) 'Demand-Side Management: Overcoming Market Barriers or Obscuring Real Costs?', Energy Policy, 22, 840-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, C., and J. Tschirhart (1990) 'The Public Utility Policy Act and Regulatory Behavior', Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2, 21-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company (1993) 'Annual Summary Report on Demand Side Management Programs in 1992 and 1993'.

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company (1994) 'Annual Summary Report On Demand Side Management Programs in 1993 and 1994'.

  • Ruff, L. E. (1988) 'Least-Cost-Planning and Demand-Side-Management: Six Common Fallacies and one Simple Truth', Public Utilities Fortnightly, April 1988, pp. 19-26.

  • San Diego Gas and Electric (1990) 'Annual Summary of Demand Side Management Activities', March 1990.

  • Sartre, J. P. (1948) Existentialism and Humanism. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M., E. Hirst, and L. Hill (1991) Demand-Side Management and Integrated Resource Planning Findings from a Survey of 24 Electric Utilities. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  • Seattle City Light (1992) 'Energy Conservation Accomplishments', 1987-1991.

  • Sioshansi, F. P. (1991) 'The Myths and Facts of Energy Efficiency. Survey of Implementation Issues', Energy Policy, 13, 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoft, St. (1995) 'The Economics of Conserved-Energy 'supply' Curves', The Energy Journal, 16(4), 109-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoft, St., and R. J. Gilbert (1994) 'A Review and Analysis of Electric Utility Conservation Incentives', Yale Journal on Regulation, 11, 1-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuntz, L. G. (1995) 'Current Shock: Competition in Electricity Service', Resources, 118, 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, E. (1992a) 'Free Rider Estimation: Redefining the Use of Surveys', Energy, 17(10), 919-925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, E. (1992b) 'Persistence of Energy Savings: What Do We Know and How Can It Be Ensured?', Energy, 17(11), 1073-1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., and B. Whitehead (1994) 'It's Not Easy Being Green', Harvard Business Review, May–June 1994, pp. 46-52.

  • Wirl, F. (1989) 'Analytics of Demand-Side Conservation Programs', Energy Systems & Policy, 13, 285-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirl, F. (1994) 'On the Unprofitability of Utility Demand-Side-Conservation Programmes', Energy Economics, 16, 46-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirl, F. (1995) 'Impact of Regulation on Demand Side-Conservation Programs', Journal of Regulatory Economics, 7, 43-62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, P. O. Box 4120, D-39016, Magdeburg, Germany

    Franz Wirl

  2. Vienna University of Technology, Gußhausstr. 27–29, A-1040, Vienna, Austria

    Wolfgang Orasch

Authors
  1. Franz Wirl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wolfgang Orasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wirl, F., Orasch, W. Analysis of United States' Utility Conservation Programs. Review of Industrial Organization 13, 467–486 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007707523605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007707523605

Search

Navigation