Skip to main content
Log in

Risk intermediation in supply chains

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that an important role of intermediaries in supply chains is to reduce the financial risk faced by retailers. It is well known that risk averse retailers when faced by the classical single-period inventory (newsvendor) problem will order less than the expected value maximizing (newsboy) quantity. We show that in such situations a risk neutral distributor can offer a menu of mutually beneficial contracts to the retailers. We show that a menu can be designed to simultaneously: (i) induce every risk averse retailer to select a unique contract from it; (ii) maximize the distributor's expected profit; and (iii) raise the order quantity of the retailers to the expected value maximizing quantity. Thus inefficiency created due to risk aversion on part of the retailers can be avoided. We also investigate the influence of product/market characteristics on the offered menu of contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andel, T. (1996) Manage inventory, own information. Transportation and Distribution, 37(5), 54-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1974) Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, North-Holland, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. (1973) Point estimation and risk preferences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 944-950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, P. and Lehmann, E. (1979) Descriptive statistics for non-parametric models. IV: spread, in Contributions to Statistics, Juneckova, J. (ed), Reidel Publishing Co, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, L. and Bounds, W. (1997) Stores' demands squeeze apparel companies. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition, Jul 15, B1:3.

  • Carvajal, D. (1998) Publishing industry's focus shifts to limiting returns. New York Times, Late edition (East Coast), Jul 27, D9:1.

  • Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C. and Schlesinger, H. (1995) The risk averse (and prudent) newsboy. Management Science, 41(5), 786-794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppen, G.D. and Schrage, L.E. (1981) Effects of centralization in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand, Chapter 3 in Multi-Level Inventory/Production Control Systems: Theory and Practice, Schwarz, L.B. (ed), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A. and Zipkin, P. (1984) Approximations of dynamic multilocation production and inventory problems. Management Science, 30, 69-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, I. (1970) Decision Making and the Theory of the Firm, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.L. and Muckstadt, J.A. (1989) Risk pooling in a two-period, two-echelon inventory stocking and allocation problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 36, 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. (1997) Now everyone in PCs wants to be like Mike. Fortune, 136(5), 91-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M. (1990) A Course in Microeconomic Theory, Princeton University Press, NJ, p. 588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, M. and Meilijson, I. (1994) The generating process and an extension of Jewitt's location independent risk concept. Management Science, 40, 662-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. (1996) Shelf Wars. Sales and Marketing Management, 148, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, M. and Seshadri, S. (2000) Policy parameters for supply chain coordination. IIE Transactions on Operations Engineering, 32(3), 245-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, S.S., Smith, S.A. and Wilson, R.B. (1983) Competitive nonlinear tariffs. Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 49-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W. (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1970) Increasing risk: I. a definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1971) Increasing risk: II. its economic consequences. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 66-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1972) Addendum to increasing risk: I. a definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 629-649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, L.B. (1989) A model for assessing the value of warehouse risk-pooling: risk-pooling over outside supplier lead-times. Management Science, 35, 828-842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, L.B., Deuermeyer, B.L. and Badinelli, R.D. (1985) Fill-rate optimization in a one-warehouse N-identical retailer distribution system. Management Science, 31, 488-498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (1994) Stochastic Orders and Their Applications, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1977) Monopoly, non-linear pricing and imperfect in-formation: the insurance market. Review of Economic Studies, 44, 407-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A.A., Nahmias, S. and Agrawal. (1999) Modeling supply chain contracts: a review, Chapter 10 in Tayyur, S., Ganesan, R. and Magazine, M. (eds) Quantitive Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA., pp. 299-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z.K. (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Science, 41(9), 1509-1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1993) Non-Linear Pricing, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawal, V., Seshadri, S. Risk intermediation in supply chains. IIE Transactions 32, 819–831 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007630925625

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007630925625

Keywords

Navigation