Abstract
Legislative socialisation has long been an important force for political deradicalisation in capitalist democracies worldwide. It remains barely explored, however, in large part because it is a process very difficult to track by conventional observational or survey methods. We circumvent these problems by taking advantage of an unusually propitious vote on televising the proceedings of the British House of Commons to chart the institutional deradicalisation of its Labour members. Socialisation effects are shown to be non-linear and, while the difference is not statistically significant, to be marginally stronger among Members of Parliament (MPs) with frontbench experience. The somewhat greater conservatism of frontbenchers, however, cannot be explained by anticipatory socialisation. Rather, it seems to be a function of doing well under ‘rules of the parliamentary game’ threatened by proposals for institutional reform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler, D. & Butler, G. (1995). British political facts 1900–1994. London: Macmillan.
Cain, B.E., Ferejohn, J. & Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DeMaris, A. (1990). Interpreting logistic regression results: A critical commentary, Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 271–277.
Dawson, R.E., Prewitt, K. & Dawson, K.S. (1977). Political socialization: An analytic study. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Drewry, G. (ed.) (1989). The new select committees, rev. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fenno, R.F., Jr. (1962). The House Appropriations Committee as a political system: The problem of integration, American Political Science Review 56: 310–324.
Fenno, R.F., Jr. (1990), The Senate through the looking glass: The debate over television, in J. Hibbing (ed.), The changing world of the US Senate. Berkeley, CA: Institute for Governmental Studies Press.
Franklin, B. (1992). Televising the British House of Commons: Issues and developments, in B. Franklin (ed.), Televising democracies. London: Routledge.
Friedrich, R. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations, American Journal of Political Science 26: 797–833.
Gujarati, D. (1995). Basic econometrics, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hagle, T.M. & Mitchell, G.E. (1992). Goodness-of-fit measures for probit and logit, American Journal of Political Science 36: 762–784.
King, A. (1981). The rise of the career politician in Britain, and its consequences, British Journal of Political Science 11: 249–285.
Lenin, V.I. (1932). State and revolution. New York: International Publishers.
Louis, M.R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings, Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 226–251.
Marquand, D. (1979). Parliament for Europe. London: Cape.
Marsh, D. & Read, M. (1988). Private members’ bills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Michels, R. (1962). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Collier Books.
Miliband, R. (1972). Parliamentary socialism: A study in the politics of the Labour Party, 2nd edn. London: Merlin Press.
Morrison of Lambeth, Lord (1964). Government and parliament, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mughan, A. & Patterson, S.C., eds. (1992). Political leadership in democratic societies. Chicago. Nelson-Hall.
Mughan, A. & Scully, R.M. (1997). Accounting for changing free vote outcomes in the House of Commons, British Journal of Political Science 27 (forthcoming).
Mughan, A. & Swarts, J.P. (1997). The coming of parliamentary television: The Lords and the Senate compared, Political Studies 45: 36–48.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poguntke, Th. (1993). Alternative politics: The German Green Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Przeworski, A. & Sprague, J. (1986). Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Putnam, R.D. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Read, M., Marsh, D. & Richards, D. (1994). Why did they do it? Voting on homosexuality and capital punishment in the House of Commons, Parliamentary Affairs 47: 374–386.
Searing, D.D. (1982). Rules of the game in Britain: Can the politicians be trusted?, American Political Science Review 76: 239–258.
Searing, D.D. (1986). A theory of political socialization: Institutional support and deradicalization in Britain, British Journal of Political Science 16: 341–376.
Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mughan, A., Box-Steffensmeier, J. & Scully, R. Mapping legislative socialisation. European Journal of Political Research 32, 93–106 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006882723143
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006882723143