Skip to main content
Log in

Is It Safe to Use Poisson Statistics in Nuclear Spectrometry?

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The boundary conditions in which Poisson statistics can be applied in nuclear spectrometry are investigated. Improved formulas for the uncertainty of nuclear counting with deadtime and pulse pileup are presented. A comparison is made between the expected statistical uncertainty for loss-free counting, fixed live-time and fixed real-time measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ICRU, Particle Counting in Radioactivity Measurements, ICRU report 52, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Maryland, USA, 1994, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Gilmore, J. Hemingway, Practical gamma-ray spectrometry, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Jenkins, R. W. Gould, D. Gedcke, Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA, 1995, p. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. PommÉ, Proc. 2nd Intern. k 0 Users Workshop, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1996, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1997, p. 11.

  5. S. PommÉ, F. Hardeman, P. Robouch, N. Etxebarria, G. Arana, Neutron Activation Analysis with k 0-standardisation: General Formalism and Procedure, Internal Report SCK CEN, BLG-700, 1997, p. 105.

  6. S. PommÉ, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 49 (1998) 1213.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. PommÉ, B. Denecke, J-P. Alzetta, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A426 (1999) 564.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. PommÉ, J-P. Alzetta, J. Uyttenhove, B. Denecke, G. Arana, P. Robouch, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A422 (1999) 388.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. PommÉ, How pileup rejection affects the precision of loss-free counting, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, in press.

  10. S. PommÉ, Is Loss-Free Counting under Statistical Control? presented at Intern. Conf. on Nuclear Analytical Methods in The Life Sciences, Beijing, China, 1998, Biological Trace Element Research, in press.

  11. S. PommÉ, Time interval distributions and counting statistics with a non-paralysable spectrometer, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, submitted for publication.

  12. S. PommÉ, G. Kennedy, Pulse Loss and Counting Statistics with a Digital Spectrometer, presented at the 12th International Conference on Radionuclide Metrology and its Application, ICRM'99, Prague, Czech Republic, 1999, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, submitted for publication.

  13. J. Harms, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 53 (1967) 192.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. P. Westphal, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 163 (1979) 189.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. P. Westphal, J. Radioanal. Chem., 70 (1982) 387.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. P. Westphal, Nucl. Instr. Meth., B10/11 (1985) 1047.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Jenkins, R. W. Gould, D. Gedcke, Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry, 1st ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pommé, S., Robouch, P., Arana, G. et al. Is It Safe to Use Poisson Statistics in Nuclear Spectrometry?. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 244, 501–506 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006770612213

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006770612213

Keywords

Navigation