Skip to main content
Log in

Newtonian Supertasks: A Critical Analysis

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In two recent papers Perez Laraudogoitia has described a variety of supertasks involving elastic collisions in Newtonian systems containing a denumerably infinite set of particles. He maintains that these various supertasks give examples of systems in which energy is not conserved, particles at rest begin to move spontaneously, particles disappear from a system, and particles are created ex nihilo. An analysis of these supertasks suggests that they involve systems that do not satisfy the mathematical conditions required of Newtonian systems at the time the supertask is due to be completed, or else they rely on the application of the time-reversal transformation to states which are not well-defined. Consequently, it is unjustified to conclude that the paradoxical results are arising from within the framework of Newtonian mechanics. In the last part of this article, we discuss various aspects of the physics of these supertasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alper, J. S. and Bridger, M.: 1997, ‘Mathematics, Models, and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion’, Synthese 110, 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benacerraf, P.: 1970, ‘Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics’, in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 103–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. C. W.: 1977, The Physics of Time Asymmetry, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieudonné, J.: 1960, Foundations of Modern Analysis, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.: 1963, Lecture on Physics vol 1, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H.: 1980, Classical Mechanics, 2nd Ed. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, K.: 1966, Quantum Mechanics, New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A.: 1968, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion, in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 200–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, M. W. and Smale, S.: 1974, Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra, Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.: 1950, Introduction to Metamathematics. Princeton, New Jersey: D. van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A.: 1973, Gravitation, San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnes, R.: 1994, The Interpretation of Quantum Physics, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez Laraudogoitia, J.: 1996, ‘A Beautiful Supertask’, Mind 105, 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez Laraudogoitia, J.: 1998, ‘Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo’, Synthese 114, (this issue).

  • Riesz, F. and Sz.-Nagy, B.: 1955, Functional Analysis, New York: Unger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alper, J.S., Bridger, M. Newtonian Supertasks: A Critical Analysis. Synthese 114, 355–369 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005057130067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005057130067

Keywords

Navigation