Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the paramagnetic-antiferromagnetic transition and the γ → ε martensitic transformation in Fe-Mn alloys

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paramagnetic-antiferromagnetic transition and the γ → ε martensitic transformation of Fe-Mn (Mn 15–32 wt%) alloys have been investigated by resistivity, dilatometry and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results show that paramagnetic-antiferromagnetic transition increases the resistivity and the volume of alloys, whereas the γ → ε martensitic transformation reduces the resistivity and volume of alloys. The A f ε that was determined by the dilatometric method is not the temperature that ε martensites in the Fe-Mn alloys have reverse transformed to austenites completely. Mn additions reduce M s, increase T N and the lattice parameter of austenite in the Fe-Mn alloys. Both the antiferromagnetic transition and the γ → ε martensitic transformation lead to an increase in the lattice parameter of austenite. The lattice parameters both above T N and below T N decrease linearly with temperature. The lattice parameter below M s increases first and then decreases. Moreover, the α (110) and ε (002) atomic planes in the Fe-15Mn-0.15C alloy are separated into two peaks: 2θ for ε(002) is 44.16°, 2θ for α(110) is 44.47°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. G. RICKERBY and G. PIATTI, Mater. Sci. Techno. 7 (1991) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. ABE, H. ARAKI and T. NODA, ibid. 4 (1988) 885.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. C. LIU, T. HASHIDA, H. TAKAHASHI, H. KUWANO and Y. HAMAGUCHI, Metall. Mater. Trans. 29 (1998) 791.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. TOMOTA, Y. XIA and K. INOUE, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 1577.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. K. BANERJI, Met. Prog. 118(4) (1978) 59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. M. ZHU and Y. S. ZHANG, Corrosion 54 (1998) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. T. CHAI, J. B. DUH and J. T. LEE, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 3517.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. YE, Acta Metall. Sinica 13 (1977) 149 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. S. ZHANG, ibid. 19(1983) A262 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. S. ZHANG, F. T. ZHANG, Y. H. GAO and G. Y. WANG, ibid. 20 (1984) A1 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. N. YAO, Steel and Iron 27(12) (1992) 68 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. K. ZUIDEMA, D. K. SUBRAMANYAM and W. C. LESTIE, Metall. Trans. 18A (1987) 1629.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. ENDOH and Y. ISHIKAWA, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 30 (1971) 1614.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. ASANO and J. YAMASHITA, ibid. 31 (1971) 1000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. S. ZHANG, Acta Metall. Sinica 22 (1986) A470.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Idem., J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 18 (1988) L229.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Idem., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 (1990) 10033.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. F. GILLIES, J. N. CHAPMAN and J. C. S. KOOLS, J. Appl. Phys. 78 (1995) 5554.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. JIN, Y. Z. WU, G. S. DONG and X. F. JIN, Acta Phys. Sinica 48 (1999) 289 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. S. ZHANG, Bulletin of Sci. and Tech. 9(1) (1993) 6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Idem., China Patent 1990 No 19905362.

  22. A. HOLDEN, J. D. BOLTON and E. R. PETTY, J. Iron Steel Inst. (1971) 721.

  23. K. ENAMI, A. NAGASAWA and S. NENNO, Scripta Metall. (1975) 941.

  24. A. SATO, E. CHISHIMA, K. SOMA and T. MORI, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 1177.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. SATO, E, CHISHIMA, Y. YAMAJI and T. MORI, ibid. 32 (1984) 539.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. SATO, Y. YAMAJI and T. MORI, ibid. 34 (1986) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. MURAKAMI, H. OTSUKA, H. G. SUZUKI and S. MATSUDA, in Proc. Int. Conf. Martensitic Transformation, Nara, Japan, 1986 (Japan Inst. Metals, 1987) p. 985

  28. J. H. YANG and C. M. WAYMAN, Metall. Trans. 23A (1992) 1431.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. OGAWA and S. KAJIWARA, Mater. Trans. JIM 34 (1993) 1169.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. P. PUTAUX and J. P. CHEVALIER, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 1701.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. H. JIANG, X. QI, S. X. YANG, W. M. ZHOU and T. Y. HSU, ibid. 46 (1998) 501.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O. MATSUMURA, S. FURUSAKO, T. FUKAWA and H. OTSUKA, ISIJ Intel. 36 (1996) 1103.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. COTES, M. SADE and A. FERNANDEZ GUILLERMET, Metall. Mater. Trans. 26A (1995) 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Z. X. QIN, M. P. YU and Y. S. ZHANG, J. Mater. Sci. 31 (1996) 2311.

    Google Scholar 

  35. X. LU and Y. S. ZHANG, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 29 (1996) 1428.

    Google Scholar 

  36. X. LU, Z. X. QIN, Y. S. ZHANG, X. Y. WANG, F. X. LI, B. Z. PING and Z. Q. HU, J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 16 (3) (2000) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  37. V. W. SCHMIDT, Arch. Eisenh. 3 (1929) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Y. HOSHINO, S. NAKAMURA, N. ISHIKAWA, Y. YAMAJI, S. MATSUMOTO, Y. TANAKA and A. SATO, Mater. Trans. JIM 33 (1992) 253.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. TOLBA-SALLAM, D. GEORGEAULT and G. CIZERON, Script. Metall. 15 (1981) 849.

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. UMEBAYASHI and Y. ISHIKAWA, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 21 (1966) 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  41. X. LU, Z. X. QIN, Y. S. ZHANG, B. Z. DING and Z. Q. HU, Script. Mater. 42 (2000) 433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xing, L., Zuoxiang, Q., Yansheng, Z. et al. Study of the paramagnetic-antiferromagnetic transition and the γ → ε martensitic transformation in Fe-Mn alloys. Journal of Materials Science 35, 5597–5603 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004865331956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004865331956

Keywords

Navigation