Skip to main content
Log in

Singulary Extensional Connectives: A Closer Look

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The totality of extensional 1-ary connectives distinguishable in a logical framework allowing sequents with multiple or empty (alongside singleton) succedents form a lattice under a natural partial ordering relating one connective to another if all the inferential properties of the former are possessed by the latter. Here we give a complete description of that lattice; its Hasse diagram appears as Figure 1 in §2. Simple syntactic descriptions of the lattice elements are provided in §3; §§4 and 5 give some additional remarks on matrix methods and on alternative terminology. Background: The size of this lattice was underestimated in [3]; some missing cases were noted in [4] in the course of correcting an example from [3] purporting to show the non-distributivity of the lattice. All the ‘missing cases’ (as well as those originally noted) are covered here. (The present discussion is self-contained.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Carnap, R. (1961): Formalization of Logic (1943), reprinted in Introduction to Semantics and Formalization of Logic, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czelakowski, J. (1981): Equivalential logics (I), (II), Studia Logica 40: 227–236 (Part (I)), 355–372 (Part (II)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Humberstone, I. L. (1986): Extensionality in sentence position, Journal of Philosophical Logic 15: 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humberstone, I. L. (1988): The lattice of extensional connectives: a correction, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17: 221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Humberstone, I. L. (forthcoming): Negation by Iteration, in Theoria.

  6. Humberstone, I. L. (in preparation): Hybridizing some familiar binary connectives.

  7. Makinson, D. (1971): Some embedding theorems in modal logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12: 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ore, O. (1944): Galois connexions, Transactions of the American Math. Society 55: 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rautenberg, W. (1981): 2-element matrices, Studia Logica 40: 315–353.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rautenberg, W. (1985): Consequence relations of 2-element algebras, in Dorn, G. and Weingarter, P. (eds), Foundations of Logic and Linguistics: Problems and their Solutions, Plenum Press, 3–23.

  11. Rautenberg, W. (1989): A calculus for the common rules of 2227 and 2228, Studia Logica 48: 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12. Rautenberg, W. (1989): Axiomatization of semigroup consequences, Arch. Math. Logic 29: 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13. Scott, D. S. (1974): Completeness and axiomatizability in many-valued logic, in Henkin, L. et al.(eds.), Procs. of the Tarski Symposium, American Math. Society, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segerberg, K. (1971): An essay in classical modal logic, Uppsala, Filosofisker Studier.

  15. Segerberg, K. (1982): Classical Propositional Operators, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shoesmith, D. J. and Smiley, T. J. (1978): Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wójcicki, R. (1988): Theory of Logical Calculi, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humberstone, I.L. Singulary Extensional Connectives: A Closer Look. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26, 341–356 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004240612163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004240612163

Keywords

Navigation