Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of electrolyte impurities on current efficiency in aluminium electrolysis cells

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of electrolyte impurity species on current efficiency with respect to aluminium (CE) was studied in a specially designed laboratory cell at 980∘C, with a graphite anode and a cathodic current density of 0.85Acm−2. The electrowinning was performed in a base melt of Na3AlF6 with a NaF/AlF3 molar ratio of 2.5 and with 4–6wt% Al2O3 and 5wt% CaF2. Impurity species, probably present in only one valence state in the electrolyte, Mg, Ba and B, had no measurable effect on CE for low impurity concentrations. Sn, added to the electrolyte as SnO2, also did not affect current efficiency, probably due to its low solubility. The results show a linear decrease in CE with increasing electrolyte concentration of the polyvalent impurity species from the elements, Fe, P, V, Si, Zn, Ti and Ga. The decrease was found to be within the range 0.1 to 0.7% in C E per0.01wt% of impurity cations present in the electrolyte, with phosphorus ions as the most detrimental. The effects of the individual impurity species on CE appear to be roughly additive for electrolytes containing more than one impurity species. The results obtained cannot be explained by a simple codeposition mechanism or a single reduction to a soluble species of a lower valency. The most likely mechanism explaining the observed decrease in CE for a large number of impurity species is cyclic redox reactions in the cathode and anode/CO2 interfacial boundary layers. Such a mechanism may also be the dominant one in commercial cells, since the impurity levels are of the same size as in the laboratory cell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Å. Sterten and P. A. Solli, J. Appl. Electrochem. 25 (1995) 809.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Idem, ibid. 26 (1996) 187.

  3. P. A. Solli, T. Eggen, S. Rolseth, E. Skybakmoen and Å. Sterten, ibid. 26 (1996) 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Solli, T. Eggen, E. Skybakmoen and Å. Sterten ibid. 27 (1997) 939.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. G. Johansen, ‘Jern som forurensningselement i aluminiumelektrolysen’, Dr. ing. thesis, Department of Electrochemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTH), Trondheim, Norway (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinovsky, K. Matiasovsky and J. Thonstad, ‘Aluminium Electrolysis. Fundamentals of the Hall–Héroult process’, 2nd. edn., Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf (1982), Ch. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Grjotheim and K. Matiasovsky, Aluminium 59 (1983) 687.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Å. Sterten, Acta Chem. Scand. 44 (1990) 873.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Å. Sterten, ‘Light Metals’ (edited by E. L. Rooy), Proceedings of 120th TMS annual meeting, New Orleans (1991), p. 445.

  10. C. Szeker, Acta Technika Acad. Sci. Hung. 10 (1954) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kerouanton and J. Badoz-Lambling, Rev. Chim. Minerale 11 (1974) 223.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. B. Frolova, V. B. Dobrokhotov, and A. M. Tsyplakov, Trudy VAMI 89 (1974) 36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gerlach, and L. Deininger, Metall. 33 (1979) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. I. Anufrieva, L. S. Baranova and Z. N. Balashova, Sov. J. Non-Ferrous Met. 24 (1983) 38.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Keller, ‘Light Metals’ (editor J. E. Andersen), Proceedings of the 111th TMS annual meeting, Dallas (1982), p. 215.

  16. A. I. Belyaev, M. B. Rapoport and L. A. Firsanova, ‘Elektrometallurgiya Alyuminiya’, Metallurgizdat, Moscow, (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rolin and C. Bernard, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1963), p. 1035.

  18. H. Xiao, J. Thonstad and S. Rolseth, Acta Chem. Scand. 49 (1995) 96.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. de Young, ‘Light Metals’ (editor R. E. Miller), Proceedings of the 115th TMS annual meeting, New Orleans (1986), p. 299.

  20. Y. Hayakawa and H. Kido, J. Electrochem. Soc. Japan 20 (1952) 263.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. A. Solli, ‘Current Efficiency in Aluminium Electrolysis Cells’, Dr. ing. thesis, Department of Electrochemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTH), Trondheim, Norway (1993), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sterten, Å., Solli, P.A. & Skybakmoen, E. Influence of electrolyte impurities on current efficiency in aluminium electrolysis cells. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 28, 781–789 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003425901393

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003425901393

Navigation