Abstract
The influence of electrolyte impurity species on current efficiency with respect to aluminium (CE) was studied in a specially designed laboratory cell at 980∘C, with a graphite anode and a cathodic current density of 0.85Acm−2. The electrowinning was performed in a base melt of Na3AlF6 with a NaF/AlF3 molar ratio of 2.5 and with 4–6wt% Al2O3 and 5wt% CaF2. Impurity species, probably present in only one valence state in the electrolyte, Mg, Ba and B, had no measurable effect on CE for low impurity concentrations. Sn, added to the electrolyte as SnO2, also did not affect current efficiency, probably due to its low solubility. The results show a linear decrease in CE with increasing electrolyte concentration of the polyvalent impurity species from the elements, Fe, P, V, Si, Zn, Ti and Ga. The decrease was found to be within the range 0.1 to 0.7% in C E per0.01wt% of impurity cations present in the electrolyte, with phosphorus ions as the most detrimental. The effects of the individual impurity species on CE appear to be roughly additive for electrolytes containing more than one impurity species. The results obtained cannot be explained by a simple codeposition mechanism or a single reduction to a soluble species of a lower valency. The most likely mechanism explaining the observed decrease in CE for a large number of impurity species is cyclic redox reactions in the cathode and anode/CO2 interfacial boundary layers. Such a mechanism may also be the dominant one in commercial cells, since the impurity levels are of the same size as in the laboratory cell.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Å. Sterten and P. A. Solli, J. Appl. Electrochem. 25 (1995) 809.
Idem, ibid. 26 (1996) 187.
P. A. Solli, T. Eggen, S. Rolseth, E. Skybakmoen and Å. Sterten, ibid. 26 (1996) 1019.
P. A. Solli, T. Eggen, E. Skybakmoen and Å. Sterten ibid. 27 (1997) 939.
H. G. Johansen, ‘Jern som forurensningselement i aluminiumelektrolysen’, Dr. ing. thesis, Department of Electrochemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTH), Trondheim, Norway (1975).
K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinovsky, K. Matiasovsky and J. Thonstad, ‘Aluminium Electrolysis. Fundamentals of the Hall–Héroult process’, 2nd. edn., Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf (1982), Ch. 10.
K. Grjotheim and K. Matiasovsky, Aluminium 59 (1983) 687.
Å. Sterten, Acta Chem. Scand. 44 (1990) 873.
Å. Sterten, ‘Light Metals’ (edited by E. L. Rooy), Proceedings of 120th TMS annual meeting, New Orleans (1991), p. 445.
C. Szeker, Acta Technika Acad. Sci. Hung. 10 (1954) 19.
A. Kerouanton and J. Badoz-Lambling, Rev. Chim. Minerale 11 (1974) 223.
E. B. Frolova, V. B. Dobrokhotov, and A. M. Tsyplakov, Trudy VAMI 89 (1974) 36.
J. Gerlach, and L. Deininger, Metall. 33 (1979) 131.
N. I. Anufrieva, L. S. Baranova and Z. N. Balashova, Sov. J. Non-Ferrous Met. 24 (1983) 38.
R. Keller, ‘Light Metals’ (editor J. E. Andersen), Proceedings of the 111th TMS annual meeting, Dallas (1982), p. 215.
A. I. Belyaev, M. B. Rapoport and L. A. Firsanova, ‘Elektrometallurgiya Alyuminiya’, Metallurgizdat, Moscow, (1953).
M. Rolin and C. Bernard, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1963), p. 1035.
H. Xiao, J. Thonstad and S. Rolseth, Acta Chem. Scand. 49 (1995) 96.
D. de Young, ‘Light Metals’ (editor R. E. Miller), Proceedings of the 115th TMS annual meeting, New Orleans (1986), p. 299.
Y. Hayakawa and H. Kido, J. Electrochem. Soc. Japan 20 (1952) 263.
P. A. Solli, ‘Current Efficiency in Aluminium Electrolysis Cells’, Dr. ing. thesis, Department of Electrochemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTH), Trondheim, Norway (1993), p. 187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sterten, Å., Solli, P.A. & Skybakmoen, E. Influence of electrolyte impurities on current efficiency in aluminium electrolysis cells. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 28, 781–789 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003425901393
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003425901393