Skip to main content
Log in

Judgments Regarding Sexual Aggression as a Function of Sex of Aggressor and Victim

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of sex of aggressor and victim (male/female, female/male, male/male, female/female) on judgments regarding sexual aggression on a date were studied. Participants were 415 female and 279 male community college students (M age = 23.0 years; 47.3% European American, 18.6% Latin American, 7.5% African American, 7.8% South East Asian American, 3.7% Asian American, and 15.1% other) who read one of four vignettes describing a date in which forced intercourse occurred. Participants rated degree of disapproval of the aggressor's behavior from their own viewpoint (Participant Rating), the victim's viewpoint (Victim Rating), and the aggressor's viewpoint (Aggressor Rating). Results of 4 × 2 (Vignette × Participant Gender) ANOVAs of Participant Rating and Victim Rating indicated similar disapproval of the aggressor for all couple types except for female aggressor/male victim, for whom disapproval was significantly lower. The aggressor's overall behavior was rated as date/acquaintance rape by 46.6–55.4% of participants for all vignettes except the female aggressor/male victim vignette (18.7%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baier, J., Rosenzweig, M., & Whipple, E. (1991). Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 310–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, R., Kuntz, T., Van Laar, S., Williams, J., & Hall, D. S. (1996). College students' judgments regarding sexual aggression during a date. Sex Roles, 35, 765–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Kimmel, D. C., Amaro, H., & Melton, G. B. (1991). Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research. American Psychologist, 46, 957–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxen, A. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Schütze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenhöfer, E. (2000).The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. D., & Waterman, C. K. (1999). Predicting self-protection against sexual assault in dating relationships among heterosexual men and women, gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L. (2000). Categories and sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., Powch, I. G., Phelps, J. L., & Giusti, L. M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W.H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. (1991). Male victims of acquaintance rape. InA. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9–25). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1994).Men pressured and forced into sexual experience. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L. J., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hannon, R., Hall, D.S., Nash, H. et al. Judgments Regarding Sexual Aggression as a Function of Sex of Aggressor and Victim. Sex Roles 43, 311–322 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026643225329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026643225329

Keywords

Navigation