Abstract
Previous research on cooperative and competitive reward systems has investigated the relation between extreme cooperative and competitive conditions, along with an intermediate noninterdependent neutral condition, to numerous outcome variables. This study added two additional conditions to these three usual conditions, between the neutral midpoint and the cooperative or competitive extremes, to see if these intermediate conditions might be distinctive in the outcomes they produced. The study used 240 participants, divided into groups of three that played a board game under these five different reward conditions. Participants' attitudes toward self, others, and task were then assessed and analyzed along with objective measures of performance, measures of self-esteem, state and trait anxiety, and results coded from an autobiographical report in game-defined roles. Results indicated that the intermediate cooperative condition was distinctively different from the extreme cooperative condition in predicted ways, and that the intermediate competitive condition was distinctively different from the extreme competitive condition, but in unpredicted ways. The research also demonstrated that an individualistic condition, which had previously been thought to produce neither a cooperative nor competitive social orientation, in fact produced both, raising questions as to whether reward interdependence, as researchers have defined it, is really the cause of cooperation and competition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1981). Competitive versus cooperative reward structures: The influence of individual and group performance factors on achievement, attributions and affect. American Educ. Res. J. 18: 273–287.
Ames, C., and Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition. J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 535–556.
Ames, C., Ames, R., and Felker, D. (1977). Informational and dispositional determinants of children's achievement attributions. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 63–69.
Ames, C., and Felker, D. (1979). An examination of children's attributions and achievement-related evaluations in competitive, cooperative, and individualistic reward structures. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 413–420.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., and Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Brown, R. (1986). Social Psychology, 2nd Ed., The Free Press, New York.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-esteem, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
Deutsch, M. (1949a). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Rel. 2: 129–151.
Deutsch, M. (1949b). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group processes. Human Rel. 2: 199–232.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven.
DeVries, D. L., and Edwards, K. J. (1974). Student teams and learning games: Their effects on crossrace and cross-sex interaction. J. Educ. Psychol. 66: 741–749.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Rel. 7: 117–140.
Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press, New York.
Goethals, G. W., and Darley, J. N. (1978). Social comparison theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In Mullen, B., and Goethals, G. (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 21–47.
Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A. B. (1975). The Adjective Checklist manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto.
Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research, Interaction Book Co., Edina, MN.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson R. T., and Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Rev. Educ. Res. 53: 5–54.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., and Scott, L. (1978). The effect of cooperative and individualized instruction on student attitudes and achievement. J. Soc. Psychol. 104: 207–216.
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., and Skon, R. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 89: 47–62.
Kohn, A. (1986). No Contest: The Case Against Competition, Houghton Mifflin, New York.
Marshall, H., and Weinstein, R. (1984a). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations: An interactional model. Am. Educ. Res. J. 54: 301–326.
Marshall, H., and Weinstein, R. (1984b). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations. Rev. Educ. Res. 54: 301–325.
Miller, L., and Hamblin, R. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28: 768–778.
Rosenbaum, M., Moore, D., Cotton, J., Cook, M., Hieser, R., Shovar, N., and Gray, M. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 39(4): 626–642.
Rosenholtz, S., and Rosenholtz, S. (1981). Classroom organization and the perceptions of ability. Sociol. Educ. 54: 31–64.
Rosenholtz, S., and Simpson, C. (1984a). Classroom organization and student stratification. Elem. Sch. J. 85: 1–17.
Rosenholtz, S., and Simpson, C. (1984b). The formation of ability conceptions: Developmental trend or social construction? Rev. Educ. Res. 54: 31–64.
Rosenholtz, S. R., and Wilson, B. (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. Am. Educ. Res. J. 17: 75–82.
Rosenthal R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Schlenker, B. L., Miller, R. S., Leary, M. R., and McCawn, N. E. (1979). Group performance and interpersonal evaluations as determinants of egoistical attributions in groups. J. Person. 47: 578–594.
Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 50: 315–342.
Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M. B., and Madden, N. A. (1982). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elem. Sch. J. 84: 409–422.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Self-Evaluation Questionnaire, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto.
Spjotvoll, E., and Stoline, M. R. (1973). An extension of the T-method of multiple comparison to include the cases with unequal sample sizes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68: 976–978.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sc. Q. 40: 145–180.
Wageman, R., and Baker, G. (1996). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. J. Organiz. Behav., in press.
Weinstein, R., Marshall, H., Brattesani, K., and Middlestadt, S. (1982). Student perception of differential teacher treatment in open and traditional classrooms. J. Educ. Psychol. 74: 678–692.
Weinstein, R., and Middlestadt, S. (1979). Student perception of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 421–431.
Wenck, W. A. Jr. (1981). Attitudes as a Function of Potential Earnings, Type of Distribution System and Sex. Ph.D. Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. (Summarized in Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 151–154.)
Ziviani, C. (1981). The Effects of Pay, Distributive Justice and Social Interdependence on Task Group Performance, Process, and Attitudes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. (Summarized in Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 141–147).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gordon, F.M., Welch, K.R., Offringa, G. et al. The Complexity of Social Outcomes from Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Reward Systems. Social Justice Research 13, 237–269 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026407422558
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026407422558