Skip to main content
Log in

The Complexity of Social Outcomes from Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Reward Systems

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research on cooperative and competitive reward systems has investigated the relation between extreme cooperative and competitive conditions, along with an intermediate noninterdependent neutral condition, to numerous outcome variables. This study added two additional conditions to these three usual conditions, between the neutral midpoint and the cooperative or competitive extremes, to see if these intermediate conditions might be distinctive in the outcomes they produced. The study used 240 participants, divided into groups of three that played a board game under these five different reward conditions. Participants' attitudes toward self, others, and task were then assessed and analyzed along with objective measures of performance, measures of self-esteem, state and trait anxiety, and results coded from an autobiographical report in game-defined roles. Results indicated that the intermediate cooperative condition was distinctively different from the extreme cooperative condition in predicted ways, and that the intermediate competitive condition was distinctively different from the extreme competitive condition, but in unpredicted ways. The research also demonstrated that an individualistic condition, which had previously been thought to produce neither a cooperative nor competitive social orientation, in fact produced both, raising questions as to whether reward interdependence, as researchers have defined it, is really the cause of cooperation and competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1981). Competitive versus cooperative reward structures: The influence of individual and group performance factors on achievement, attributions and affect. American Educ. Res. J. 18: 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C., and Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition. J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 535–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C., Ames, R., and Felker, D. (1977). Informational and dispositional determinants of children's achievement attributions. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C., and Felker, D. (1979). An examination of children's attributions and achievement-related evaluations in competitive, cooperative, and individualistic reward structures. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., and Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1986). Social Psychology, 2nd Ed., The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-esteem, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949a). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Rel. 2: 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949b). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group processes. Human Rel. 2: 199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, D. L., and Edwards, K. J. (1974). Student teams and learning games: Their effects on crossrace and cross-sex interaction. J. Educ. Psychol. 66: 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Rel. 7: 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. W., and Darley, J. N. (1978). Social comparison theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In Mullen, B., and Goethals, G. (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A. B. (1975). The Adjective Checklist manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research, Interaction Book Co., Edina, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson R. T., and Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Rev. Educ. Res. 53: 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., and Scott, L. (1978). The effect of cooperative and individualized instruction on student attitudes and achievement. J. Soc. Psychol. 104: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., and Skon, R. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 89: 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1986). No Contest: The Case Against Competition, Houghton Mifflin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H., and Weinstein, R. (1984a). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations: An interactional model. Am. Educ. Res. J. 54: 301–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H., and Weinstein, R. (1984b). Classroom factors affecting students' self-evaluations. Rev. Educ. Res. 54: 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., and Hamblin, R. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28: 768–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M., Moore, D., Cotton, J., Cook, M., Hieser, R., Shovar, N., and Gray, M. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 39(4): 626–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S., and Rosenholtz, S. (1981). Classroom organization and the perceptions of ability. Sociol. Educ. 54: 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S., and Simpson, C. (1984a). Classroom organization and student stratification. Elem. Sch. J. 85: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S., and Simpson, C. (1984b). The formation of ability conceptions: Developmental trend or social construction? Rev. Educ. Res. 54: 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. R., and Wilson, B. (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. Am. Educ. Res. J. 17: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. L., Miller, R. S., Leary, M. R., and McCawn, N. E. (1979). Group performance and interpersonal evaluations as determinants of egoistical attributions in groups. J. Person. 47: 578–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 50: 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M. B., and Madden, N. A. (1982). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elem. Sch. J. 84: 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Self-Evaluation Questionnaire, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spjotvoll, E., and Stoline, M. R. (1973). An extension of the T-method of multiple comparison to include the cases with unequal sample sizes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68: 976–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sc. Q. 40: 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R., and Baker, G. (1996). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. J. Organiz. Behav., in press.

  • Weinstein, R., Marshall, H., Brattesani, K., and Middlestadt, S. (1982). Student perception of differential teacher treatment in open and traditional classrooms. J. Educ. Psychol. 74: 678–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, R., and Middlestadt, S. (1979). Student perception of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenck, W. A. Jr. (1981). Attitudes as a Function of Potential Earnings, Type of Distribution System and Sex. Ph.D. Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. (Summarized in Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 151–154.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziviani, C. (1981). The Effects of Pay, Distributive Justice and Social Interdependence on Task Group Performance, Process, and Attitudes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. (Summarized in Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 141–147).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, F.M., Welch, K.R., Offringa, G. et al. The Complexity of Social Outcomes from Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Reward Systems. Social Justice Research 13, 237–269 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026407422558

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026407422558

Navigation