Abstract
This paper explores how EU countries can address various challenges (including the aging of the population) affecting their systems of old-age income support. It presents two scenarios illustrating the most important uncertainties surrounding the major developments that affect the pension systems of the EU. To diversify these risks, EU governments should act on several fronts. In addition to the formation of human capital (especially that of children), employment (especially that of older workers) should be boosted. This calls for social insurance reform with more emphasis on individual saving schemes. Pension schemes should be more explicit about how they share demographic and other risks. Countries that currently rely heavily on public pay-as-you-go (PAYG) schemes should stimulate private pensions by gradually reducing PAYG benefits collected by high-income earners, by issuing new financial instruments, and by conducting intergenerational risk sharing through the tax system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, H. J. (1966). “The Social Insurance Paradox,” Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science 32.
Blake, D. (2000). “Does it Matter What Type of Pension Scheme You have?” Economic Journal 110, F46–F81.
Bovenberg, A. L. and A. S. M. van der Linden. (1997). “Can We Afford to Grow Old?”CPBResearch Memorandum 134. The Hague, the Netherlands.
Bovenberg, A. L. (2000a). “On the Cutting Edge Between Policy and Academia: Challenges for Public Economists,” De Economist 148(3), 295–329.
Bovenberg, A. L. (2000b). “Keep the Pension Polder Dry!” Economisch Statistische Berichten 85(4286), 1020–1022. (only in Dutch)
Brooks, R. (2000). “What Will Happen to Financial Markets When the Baby Boomers Retire?” IMF Working Paper 00/18. Washington, DC.
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. (1997). Challenging Neighbours. Rethinking German and Dutch Economic Institutions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Dilnot, A. and P. Johnson. (1993). The Taxation of Private Pensions. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Feldstein, M. and D. Altman. (1998). “Unemployment Insurance Saving Accounts.” National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper, No. 6860. Cambridge, MA.
Föster, S. (1999). “Social Insurance Based on Personal Savings,” Economic Record 75(228), 5–18.
Gruber J. and D. A. Wise. (eds.) (1999). Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heckman, J. J. (2000). “Policies to Foster Human Capital,” Research in Economics 54, 3–56.
Holzmann, R. (2000). “The World Bank Approach to Pension Reform,” International Social Security Review 53, 11–31.
Ljungqvist, L. and T. J. Sargent. (1998). “The European Unemployment Dilemma,” Journal of Political Economy 106(3), 514–550.
Merton, R. C. (1983). “On the Role of Social Security as aMeans for Efficient Risk Sharing in an Economy Where Human Capital is not Tradable.” In Z. Bodie and J. B. Shoven (eds.), Financial Aspects of the United States Pension System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
OECD Employment Outlook. (2002). OECD Paris, July 2002.
Orszag, J. M. and D. J. Snower. (1997). “Expanding theWelfare System:AProposal for Reform.”CEPR Discussion Paper 1674, London.
Razin, A. and E. Sadka. (1995). Population Economics. Boston: MIT Press.
Sinn, H.W. (1998). “The pay-as-you-go Pension System as a Fertility Insurance and Enforcement Device.” NBER Working Paper, No. 6610. Cambridge, MA.
Sinn, H. W. (2000). “Why a Funded Pension System is Useful and Why it is not Useful,” International Tax and Public Finance 7, 389–410.
World Bank. (1994). Averting the Old Age Crisis, Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bovenberg, A.L. Financing Retirement in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance 10, 713–734 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026390122672
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026390122672