Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated Assessment Modeling for Global Climate Change: An Infinite Horizon Optimization Viewpoint

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper one uses an infinite time horizon optimal control paradigm to deal with three important issues in global climate change integrated assessment, namely the equitable treatment of all the generations involved, the representation of technical progress, and the uncertainty concerning technological progress and climate change processes. The notion of economic sustainability is associated with the concept of turnpike in infinite horizon optimization models. The issue of deciding on the proper discount rate is addressed in this context and a method is proposed to reconcile long term sustainability and short term time preference for current generations. One also formulates a model where environmental damage and/or technical progress are represented as stochastic jump processes. One calls this random evolution a mode switching process. In this context, sustainability is represented by a family of turnpikes, and the economy will be driven from one steady state to the other as the modes switch. These concepts are illustrated on the DICE model and their possible implementation in other types of integrated assessment models is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Altman, E. Feinberg and A. Schwartz, Weighted discounted stochastic games with perfect information, in: Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, eds. J.A. Filar, V. Gaitsgory and K. Mizukami, Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games (2000).

  2. H.W. Arndt, The Rise Land Fall of Economic Growth: A Study in Contemporary Thought (Longman Cheshire, Sydney, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Ainslie and N. Haslam, Hyperbolic discounting, in: Choice Over Time, eds. Loewenstein and Elster (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Arrow and M. Kurz, Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Investment Policies (John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Bahn and C. Frei, GEM-E3 Switzerland: A Computable General Equilibrium Model applied for Switzerland, PSI Report 00-01, Villigen, CH (2000).

  6. K. Arrow, B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C. Holling, B.-O. Jansson, S. Levin, K.-G. Maler, C. Perrings and D. Pimental, Economic growth carrying capacity and the environment, Science 268 (1995) 520–521.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.J. Arrow, W.R. Cline, K.G. Maeler, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri and J.E. Stiglitz, Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency, in: Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. J.P. Bruce, H. Lee and E.F. Haites, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996) pp. 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.B. Asheim, W. Buchholz and B. Tungodden, Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 (2001) 252–268.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Ayong Le Kama, Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (2001) 1911–1918.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.H. Babiker, J.M. Reilly, M. Mayer, R.S. Eckaus, I.S. Wing and R.C. Hyman, The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model: Revisions, sensitivities and comparison results, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 71 (October 2001).

  11. A. Baranzini and F. Bourguignon, Is sustainable growth optimal?, in: International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 2 (1995) pp. 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Baumol and W. Oates, Economics, Environmental Policy and the Quality of Life (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Baumol and W. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Beckerman, Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Development 20 (1992) 481–496.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Beltratti, G. Chichilnisky and G. Heal, The green golden rule, Economic Letters 49 (1995) 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Bernard and M. Vielle, Toward a future for the Kyoto Protocol: some simulations with GEMINI-E3, mimeo (2001).

  17. E.K. Boukas, A. Haurie and P. Michel, An optimal control problem with a random stopping time, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 64(3) (1990) 471–480.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E.A. Boukas, A. Haurie and Ch. van Delft, A turnpike improvement algorithm for piecewise deterministic control, Optimal Control Applications and Methods 12 (1991) 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.B. Braddock, J.A. Filar and R. Zappert, Mathematical formulation of the IMAGE greenhouse effect model, Applied Mathematical Modelling 18 (1994) 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Capros et al., GEM-E3: Computable general equilibrium model for studying economy-energy-environment interactions, EUR 16714 EN, European Commission DG XII, Brussels (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Capros et al., The GEM-E3 Model: Reference Manual (National Technical University of Athens, Greece, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Carlson, A. Haurie and A. Leizarowitz, Infinite Horizon Optimal Control: Deterministic and Stochastic Systems (Springer Verlag, 1994).

  23. G. Chichilnisky, An axiomatic approach to sustainable development, Soc. Choice Welf. 13 (1996) 231–257.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Chichilnisky, What is sustainable development, Land Economy 73 (1997) 467–491.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W.R. Cline, Discounting for the very long term, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, eds. Portney and Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.L. Cropper, S.K. Aydede and P.R. Portney, Rates of time preference for saving lives, The American Economic Review 82(2) (1992) 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.A. Filar and A. Haurie, Uncertainty in environmental models: dynamic systems perspective, in: The Co-action between Living Systems and the Planet, eds. H. Greppin, R. Degli-Agosti and C. Penel (University of Geneva, laboratoire de biochimie et physiologie végétale, 1998) pp. 283–382.

  28. J.A. Filar, V. Gaitsgory and A. Haurie, Control of singularly perturbed hybrid systems, IEEE Trans. Aut. Control (2001).

  29. J.A. Filar and A. Haurie, A two-factor stochastic production model with two time scales, Automatica 37 (2001) 1505–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.E. Forest, P.H. Stone and H.D. Jacoby, How to think about human influence on climate, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 68 (October 2000).

  31. P.S. Gaertner, Optimisation analysis and integrated models of enhanced greenhouse effect, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 6 (2001) 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Ha-Duong, M.J. Grubb and J.-C.M. Hourcade, Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement, Nature 390 (1997) 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Hamilton, G. Goldstein, J. Lee, A. Manne, W. Marcuse, S. Morris and C.-O. Wene, MARKAL-MACRO: An overview, Brookhaven National Laboratory, BNL-48377 (1992).

  34. J.M. Hartwick, Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources, American Economic Review 66 (1977) 972–974.

    Google Scholar 

  35. C.M. Harvey, The reasonableness of non-constant discounting, Journal of Public Economics 53 (1994) 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Haurie, Environmental coordination in dynamic oligopolistic markets, Group Decision and Negotiation 4 (1995) 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Haurie, in: Time, Risk and Conflicts in Economics and Management Science: A Story about Turnpikes, ed. G. Zaccour (Kluwer, 2001).

  38. A. Haurie, A. Leizarowitz and Ch. van Delft, Boundedly optimal control of piecewise deterministic systems, European Journal of Operational Research 73(2) (1994) 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Haurie and Ch. van Delft, Turnpike properties for a class of piecewise deterministic systems arising in manufacturing flow control, Annals of Operations Research 29 (1991) 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  40. G.M. Heal, Interpreting sustainability, mimeo Columbia Business School, New York (May 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  41. G.M. Heal, Optimality or sustainability?, mimeo Columbia Business School, New York (June 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  42. G.M. Heal, Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability (Columbia University Press, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation, in: Choice Over Time, eds. Loewenstein and Elster (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.-Z. Li and K.-G. Löfgren, Justifying sustainability, Journal of Environmental Economics and Man7agement 41 (2001) 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  45. C.-Z. Li and K.-G. Löfgren, Economic growth, environmental quality and hyperbolic discounting, Technical report, Dept. of Economics, Umea University, Sweden (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. A. Manne, ETA-MACRO: A User's Guide, EA-1724 (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Manne, Equity, efficiency and discounting, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J.Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Manne and R.G. Rishels, Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits, 2nd edn (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  49. A.S. Manne and R.G. Richels, AMERGE: A model for evaluatng regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy 23 (1995) 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  50. L.W. McKenzie, Turnpike theory, Econometrica 44 (1976) 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  51. E.J. Mishan, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction (Allen & Unwin, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  52. W.D. Nordhaus, An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Science 258 (Nov. 1992) 1315–1319.

    Google Scholar 

  53. W.D. Nordhaus, Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  54. W.D. Nordhaus, A market based discount rate, in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J.Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 145–162.

  55. W.D. Nordhaus and J. Boyer, Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  56. R. Norgaard and R. Howarth, Sustainability and discounting the future, in: Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. R. Costanza (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. Pindyck, Optimal Timing Problems in Environmental Economics, ed. R.S. Pindyck, March, WP-2001-001, CEEPR (MIT, Cambridge, MA 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  58. B. Peleg and M.E. Yaari, On the existence of consistent course of action when tastes are changing, Review of Economic Studies 40 (1973) 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  59. P.R. Portney and J. Weyant, eds., Discounting and Intergenerational Effects (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  60. F. Ramsey, A mathematic theory of saving, Economic Journal 38 (1928) 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  61. R. Rishels, Controlled continuous time Markov processes, in: Stochastic Models, Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, eds. D.P. Heyman and M.J. Sobel (North-Holland, 1990).

  62. J. Rothmans, IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect (Kluwer, 1990).

  63. F. Tóth, Intergenerational equity and discounting, Integrated Assessment 1 (2000) 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  64. F.L. Tóth, T. Bruckner, H.-M. Fssel, M. Leimbach, G. Petschel-Held and H.-J. Schellnhuber, The tolerable windows approach to integrated assessments, in: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)-Bridging the Gaps, Proc. of the IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models (United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, 1997), CGER-Report, No. I029-'97 (1997) pp. 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  65. M.L.Weitzman, Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (1998) 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  66. M.L. Weitzman, Just keep discounting, but ..., in: Discounting and Intergenerational Effects, eds. P.R. Portney and J. Weyant (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999) pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  67. M.D. Webster, The curious role of learning in climate polics: should we wait for more data?, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No 67 (October 2000).

  68. M.D. Webster and A.P. Sokolov, A methodology for quantifying uncertainty in climate projections, Climatic Change 46 (2000) 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haurie, A. Integrated Assessment Modeling for Global Climate Change: An Infinite Horizon Optimization Viewpoint. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8, 117–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025534905304

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025534905304

Keywords

Navigation