Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

A sample of 38 regular and heavy gamblers, recruited through advertisements and not seeking treatment, were asked to describe special strategies, techniques or rituals that they used to increase their chances of winning at gambling in an open-ended interview. The mean South Oaks Gambling Screen Score for the sample was 7.7 with 64% of the sample scoring higher than 4. Their responses reflected multiple means by which the individual believed they were able to control (i.e., active illusory control, passive illusory control), reframe (i.e., interpretive control), or predict (i.e., probability control, predictive control) gambling outcomes. A larger number of cognitive distortions was associated with playing games in which skill was potentially a component (e.g., cards, sports) than in non-skill games (e.g., lotteries) as well as a positive family history of gambling. There were no sex differences. Implications of these findings for the cognitive psychopathology of gambling are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beck, A.T. & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety and its disorders. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, AT., F.D. Wright, C. F. Newman, & B. S. Liese. (1993). Cognitive therapy for substance abuse. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D.L., and Gillis, M.M. (1993). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 248–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarrochi, J. & Richardson, R. (1989). Profile of compulsive gamblers in treatment: Update and comparison. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J.L., Gupta, R., & Della Cioppa, G. (1996). A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1989). Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluations and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990a). The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990b). Addiction to fruit machines: A preliminary study among males. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990c). The acquisition, development and maintenance of fruit machine gambling in adolescence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1996). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, January, 136–142.

  • Ladouceur, R., Gaboury, A., Dumont, M., and Rochette, P. (1988). Gambling: relationship between the frequency of wins and irrational thinking. Journal of Psychology, 122, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Gaboury, A., Bujold, A., Lachance, N., & Tremblay, S. (1991). Ecological validity of laboratory studies of video poker gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. (1983). The psychology of control. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E.J. & Roth, J. (1975). The illusion of control as a function of the sequenced outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H.R., & Blume, B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry. 144, 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, V.C. (1990). Compulsive gambling hotline: Fiscal year 1990 final report. Baltimore, MD: National Center for Pathological Gambling, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, L., McCormick, R., Russo, A.M., & Taber, J.I. (1984). Patterns of substance abuse in pathological gamblers undergoing treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 8, 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R.J. (1992). Pathological gambling. Psychiatric annals, 22, 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F.M., Weitz, J.R., & Snyder, S.S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W.A. (1988). Paradoxes of Gambling Behavior. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K.C., Stinchfield, R., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Patterns and characteristics of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K. et al. Cognitive Distortions in Heavy Gambling. J Gambl Stud 13, 253–266 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024983300428

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024983300428

Keywords

Navigation