Skip to main content
Log in

On-line/Off-line: Joint Negotiation Teaching in Montreal and Vienna

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-business systems, the most recent generation of information systems, can be effectively used in teaching. One such system was developed and used in a collaborative project that involved teaching of negotiation theory and practice to students from Austria and Canada. The system provides customized course materials and a platform to conduct various e-negotiation activities. The design allows combining e-learning technologies designed to support students in their independent and individual learning with conventional face-to-face training. Our experience indicates that professional negotiation training accompanied by e-learning, and tools to support decision-making and negotiation can foster students' appreciation of the technology as well as demonstrate its limitations. The combination of technology-intensive and conventional resources contributed to students' awareness of social influences on negotiations, importance of communication, and focussed their attention on the problem and its solution. Deeper customization of the course content and delivery may further contribute to effective learning and acquiring of both communication and analytical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buffam, W. J. (2000). E-Business and IS Solutions. An Architectural Approach to Business Problems and Opportunities. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. F. (2000). “Negotiating with Your Professor: An In-Class Simulation,” in M. Wheeler (ed.), Teaching Negotiation: Ideas and Innovations. Cambridge: PON Books, 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, L. (2003). “To Have or to Have Not: An Examination of Feedback, Learner Control and Knowledge Type in Online Learning,” in R. H. Sprague (ed.), HICSS. Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society: CD-Rom, 10 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, R. (1998). A Methodology for Client/Server and Web Application Development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G., S. Köszegi, and R. Vetschera. (2002). “The Effects of Culture in Computer-mediated Negotiations,” University of Vienna.

  • Kersten, G. E. and S. J. Noronha. (1999). “WWW-based Negotiation Support: Design, Implementation, and Use,” Decision Support Systems 25, 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucca, J., N. C. Romano, and R. Sharda. (2003). “An Overview of Systems Enabling Computer Supported Collaborative Learning requiring Immersive Presence (CLCLIP),” in R. H. Sprague (ed.), HICSS. Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society: CD-Rom, 9 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. M. and R. J. Lewicki. (2000). “Teaching Negotiation with Computer Simulations: Pedagogical and Practical Considerations,” in M. Wheeler (ed.), Teaching Negotiation: Ideas and Innovations. Cambridge: PON Books, 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, G. R. (1995). “Computer-Assisted Negotiation and Mediation: Where We Are and Where We Are Going,” Negotiation Journal 11 (2), 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. E. and J. Corburn. (2000). “Using Simulations to Teach Negotiation: Pedagogical Theory and Practice,” in M. Wheeler (ed.), Teaching Negotiation: Ideas and Innovations. Cambridge: PON Books, 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köszegi, S., Kersten, G. On-line/Off-line: Joint Negotiation Teaching in Montreal and Vienna. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 337–345 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024879603397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024879603397

Navigation