Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population functioning. We compared demography (daily and total population sizes) and dispersal (dispersal rate and dispersal kernels) of the bog fritillary butterfly in two 6-km2 landscapes differing in their degree of fragmentation. In 2000, we conducted a Capture-Mark-Recapture experiment in a highly fragmented system in the marginal part of the species distribution (Belgium) and in a more continuous system in the central part of its distribution (Finland). A total of 293 and 947 butterflies were marked with 286 and 190 recapture events recorded in the fragmented and the continuous system respectively. Our results suggest that habitat loss and fragmentation affect dispersal more than demography. Although density was lower in the continuous system, it remains in the yearly range of variation observed on 10 generations in the fragmented system. However, in the fragmented system, the dispersal rate dropped drastically (39 vs. 64%) and females moved longer distances. Patch area had a significant effect on migration in the fragmented system only. From our results, we propose the definition of a new parameter, the minimal patch area (MPA) needed to establish a local population in highly fragmented landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreassen, H.P. and Ims, R.A. 1998. The effect of experimental habitat destruction and patch isolation on space use and fitness parameters in female root vole Microtus oeconomus. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 941–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette, M. and Nève, G. 1994. Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nymphilidae). Ecological Entomology 19: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette, M., Convié, I. and Nève, G. 1996. Male density affects female spatial behaviour in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecology 17: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette, M., Petit, S., and Quéva, F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette, M., Mennechez, G., Petit, S. and Schtickzelle, N. in press. Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Comptes Rendus Biologies.

  • Baguette, M., Vansteenwegen, C., Convié, I. and Nève, G. 1998. Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecologica 17: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, K-O. and Landin, J. 2001. Distribution of occupied and vacant sites and migration of Loginpa achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in a fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation 102: 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, J., Varallyay, G. and Batjes, N.H. 1998. Principal land use changes anticipated in Europe. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 67: 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. 1998. Model Selection and Inference. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debinski, D.M. and Holt, R.D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14: 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, P.C. 1996. Sources and sink in population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 326–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J.E., Gaines, M.S. and Holt, R.D. 1995a. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus,and Peromyscus). Ecology 76: 827–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J.E., Slade, N.A., Gaines, M.S. and Holt, R.D. 1995b. Population dynamics of small mammals in fragmented and continuous old-field habitat. In: Landscape Approaches in Mammalian Ecology and Conservation, pp. 175–199. Edited by W.Z. Lidicker. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, J.L. and Bowers, M.A. 1998. Demographic responses to habitat fragmentation: experimental tests at the landscape and patch scale. Ecology 79: 969–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation 100: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwillie R. 1980. Les tourbières en Europe. Collection Sauvegarde de la Nature. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88: 372–381.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. 1991. Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. 1997. Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Kuussaari, M. 1995. Butterfly metapopulation dynamics. In: Population Dynamics, New Approaches and Synthesis, pp. 149–171. Edited by N. Cappucino and P.W. Price. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., Moilanen, A. and Gyllenberg, M. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist 147: 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. and Lei, G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heino, M. and Hanski, I. 2001. Evolution of migration rates in a spatially realistic model. American Naturalist 157: 495–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D. and Lewis, O.T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 725–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, D. and Van Dyck, H. 2001. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biological Conservation 99: 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and Marks, B. 1994. Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, Reference manual. For. Sci. Dep. Oregon State University. Corvallis Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola, K. and Spitzer K. 1983. Lepidoptera associated with peatlands in central and northern Europe: a synthesis. Nota Lepidopterologica 6: 216–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousson, L., Nève, G. and Baguette, M. 1999. Metapopulation structure and conservation of the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, nymphalidae) in Belgium. Biological Conservation 87: 285–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nève, G., Barascud, B., Hughes, R.M., Aubert, J., Descimon, H., Lebrun, Ph. and Baguette, M. 1996. Dispersal, colonisation and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri, I. and Gouyon, P.H. 1997. Evolution of migration rate and other traits: the metapopulation effect. In: Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. pp. 293–321. Edited by I. Hanski and M. Gilpin. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. and Baguette, M. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W. and Hanski, I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491–494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D., Hobbs, R.J. and Margules, C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle, N., Le Boulengé, E. and Baguette, M. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. 1986. Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D. and Hanski, I. 1997. Butterfly Metapopulations. In: Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, pp. 359–386. Edited by I. Hanski and M. Gilpin. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D. and Kunin, W.E. 1999. The spatial structure of population. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 647–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. and Warren, M.S. 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 1992: 563–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väisänen, R. 1992. Distribution and abundance of diurnal Lepidoptera on a raised bog in southern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 29: 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dongen, S., Backeljau, T., Matthysen, E. and Dhondt, A.A. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on population structure of the winter moth. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecology 15: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B.A. and Murphy, D.D. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. American Naturalist 125: 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O., Schauber, E.M. and Edge, W.D. 1997. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on the behavior and demography of Gray-Tailed Voles. Conservation Biology 11: 945–956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biodiversity Research Centre, Catholic University of Louvain, 4 Place Croix du Sud, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Gwénaëlle Mennechez, Nicolas Schtickzelle & Michel Baguette

Authors
  1. Gwénaëlle Mennechez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Schtickzelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Baguette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Baguette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mennechez, G., Schtickzelle, N. & Baguette, M. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 18, 279–291 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024448829417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024448829417

Search

Navigation