Abstract
This study uses a nationally representative sample of baccalaureate recipients—4 years after graduation—to assess the effects of college selectivity and control on earnings and indebtedness related to undergraduate education. After controlling for salient background, education, and labor market characteristics there is strong evidence of a substantial earnings return to college selectivity and control, which is consistent with the bulk of earlier work in this area. The impact of these factors on education-related debt is varied, with graduates from more selective private institutions continuing to bear the largest debt burden. Findings also suggest, however, that the enhanced earnings for graduates from selective private colleges are quickly offsetting the associated debt burden. Potentially problematic issues include a mix of high debt loads and sub-par labor market experiences for graduates from low selectivity private institutions—those that also serve a disproportionate number of nontraditional students.
REFERENCES
Angle, J., and Wissmann, D. (1981). Gender, college major, and earnings. Sociol. Educ. 54: 25–33.
Astin, A. W., and Hensen, J. W. (1977). New measures of college selectivity. Res. Higher Educ. 6: 1–19.
Baum, S., and Saunders, D. (1998) Life After Debt: Results of the National Student Loan Survey, Nellie Mae, Braintree, MA.
Becker, G. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Berger, M. (1988a). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 41: 418–429.
Berger, M. (1988b). Cohort size effects on earnings: Differences by college major. Econ. Educ. Rev. 8: 1–16.
Berger, M. (1992). Private returns to specific college majors. In: Becker, W., and Lewis, D. (eds.), The Economics of American Higher Education, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 141–171.
Bound, J., and Johnson, G. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980s: An evaluation of alternative explanations. Am. Econ. Rev. 83: 371–392.
Brewer, D., and Ehrenberg, R. (1996). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence from the senior class of 1980. Res. Labor Econ. 15: 239–272.
Brewer, D., Eide, E., and Ehrenberg, R. (1999). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Cross cohort evidence on the effects of college type on earnings. J. Hum. Resour. 34: 104–123.
Bryk, A., and Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models, Sage, Newberry Park.
Business-Higher Education Forum (2002) Investing in People: Developing all of America's Talent on Campus and in the Workplace, Author, Washington, DC.
Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System, University of California Press, Berkeley.
College Board (2000). Trends in Student Aid 2000, College Entrance Examination Board, Washington, DC.
Eide, E. (1994). College major choice and changes in the gender wage gap. Contemp. Econ. Policy 7(April): 55–64.
Eide, E. (1997). Accounting for race and gender differences in college wage premium changes. Southern Econ. J. 63: 1039–1050.
Eide, E., and Waehrer, G. (1998). The role of the option value of college attendance in college major choice. Econ. Educ. Rev. 17: 73–82.
Fox, M. (1993). Is it a good investment to attend an elite private college? Econ. Educ. Rev. 12: 137–151.
Griffen, L. J., and Alexander, K. L. (1978). Schooling and socioeconomic attainments: High school and college influences. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 319–347.
Grogger, J., and Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. J. Hum. Resour. 30: 280–310.
Grubb, W. N. (1992). The economic returns to baccalaureate degrees: New evidence from the class of 1972. Rev. Higher Educ. 15: 213–231.
Hagedorn, L., Nora, A., and Pascarella, E. (1996). Preoccupational segregation among first-year college students: An application of the Duncan dissimilarity index. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 37: 425–436.
Hearn, J. C. (1984). The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociol. Educ. 57: 22–30.
Heck, R. H., and Thomas, S. L. (2000). An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 45: 153–161.
Heckman, J. (1980). Addendum to sample selection bias as a specification error. In: Stromsdorfer, E., and Farkas, G. (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Volume 5, San Francisco: Sage, pp. 970–995.
Hilmer, M. (1997). Does community college attendance provide a strategic path to higher quality education? Econ. Educ. Rev. 16: 59–68.
Hilmer, M. (2000). Does the return to university quality differ for transfer students and direct attendees? Econ. Educ. Rev. 19: 47–61.
Jacobs, J. (1995). Gender and academic specialties-Trends among recipients of college degrees in the 1980s. Sociol. Educ. 68: 81–98.
James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J., and To, D. (1989). College quality and future earnings: Where should you send your child to college? Am. Econ. Rev. 79: 247–252.
Jones, E., and Jackson, J. (1990). College grades and labor market rewards. J. Hum. Resour. 25: 253–266.
Juhn, C., Murphy, K., and Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in the returns to skill. J. Polit. Econ. 101: 410–442.
Kalleberg, A., Reskin, B., and Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65: 256–278.
Karabel, J., and Astin, A. (1975). Social class, academic ability, and college "quality." Soc. Forces 53: 381–398.
Katz, L., and Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. Q. J. Econ. 107: 35–78.
Kingston, P., and Smart, J. (1990). The economic payoff to prestigious colleges. In: Kinston, P., and L. Lewis (eds.), The High Status Track: Studies of Elite Private Schools and Stratification. SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 147–174.
Levy, F. (1998). The New Dollars and Dreams, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Levy, F., and Murnane, R. (1992). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 30: 507–513.
Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., and Schmitt, J. (1997). The State of Working America 1996- 1997, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
Mueller, R. (1988). The impact of college selectivity on income for men and women. Res. Higher Educ. 29: 175–191.
Murphy, K., and Welch, F. (1989). Wage premiums for college graduates: recent growth and possible explanations. Educ. Res. 18(May): 17–26.
National Center for Education Statistics (1999). Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study 1993/97: Second Follow-up Methodology Report (NCES 1999159), U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC.
Northwestern Lindquist-Endicott Report (1993). Northwestern University Placement Center, Chicago.
Polachek, S. (1981). Occupational self selections: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structures. Rev. Econ. Stat. 63: 60–69.
Pryer, F. L., and Schaffer, D. (1997). Wages and the university educated: A paradox resolved. Mon. Labor Rev. 120(7): 3–14.
Raudenbush, S., and Bryk, A. (2001). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, 1), Sage, Newbury Park.
Redd, K. (2001). Why do Students Borrow so Much? Recent National Trends in Student Loan Debt, ERIC Digest document number ED451 759. Available: http://ericir.syr.edu/.
Rumberger, R. (1983). The influence of family background on education, earnings, and wealth. Soc. Forces 61: 755–773.
Rumberger, R. (1984). The changing economic benefits of college graduates. Econ. Educ. Rev. 3: 3–11.
Rumberger, R., and Thomas, S. (1993). The economic returns to college quality, major, and performance. Econ. Educ. Rev. 12: 1–19.
Rupert, P., Schweitzer, M., Serverance-Lossin, E., and Turner, E. (1996). Earnings, Education, and Experience. Economic Review Cleveland 32(4): 2–12.
Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. J. Off. Stat. 4: 381–397.
Sax, L., Astin, A., Korn, W., and Mahoney, K. (2002). The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2001 (Los Angeles: Cooperative Institutional Research Program, American Council on Education, and University of California).
Smart, J. (1988). College influences on graduates' income levels. Res. Higher Educ. 29: 41–59.
Solmon, L. (1973). The definition and impact of college quality. In: Solmon, L., and Taubman, P. (eds.), Does College Matter? Academic Press, New York.
Solmon, L. (1975). The definition of college quality and its impact on earnings. Explor. Econ. Res. 2(Fall): 537–588.
Stolzenberg, R., and Relles, D. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62: 494–507.
Thomas, S. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns and to college quality, major and academic performance: an analysis of recent graduates in Baccalaureate & Beyond. Res. Higher Educ. 41: 281–313
Thomas, S., and Heck, R. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential Perils associated with complex sampling designs. Res. Higher Educ. 42: 517–540.
Trusheim, D., and Crouse, J. (1981). Effects of college prestige on men's occupational status and income. Res. Higher Educ. 14: 283–304.
Turner, S., and Bowen, W. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 52: 289–313.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1998). Student Loans: Limited Information Is Available to Determine How Students' College Debt Affects Their School and Lifestyle Decisions (GAO/HEHS-98-97R), Author, Washington, DC.
Wales, T. (1973). The effects of college quality on earnings: Results from the NBERThorndike data. J. Hum. Resour. 8: 306–317.
Wise, D. (1975). Academic achievement and job performance. Am. Econ. Rev. 65: 350–366.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, S.L. Longer-Term Economic Effects of College Selectivity and Control. Research in Higher Education 44, 263–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023058330965
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023058330965