Skip to main content
Log in

Longer-Term Economic Effects of College Selectivity and Control

Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses a nationally representative sample of baccalaureate recipients—4 years after graduation—to assess the effects of college selectivity and control on earnings and indebtedness related to undergraduate education. After controlling for salient background, education, and labor market characteristics there is strong evidence of a substantial earnings return to college selectivity and control, which is consistent with the bulk of earlier work in this area. The impact of these factors on education-related debt is varied, with graduates from more selective private institutions continuing to bear the largest debt burden. Findings also suggest, however, that the enhanced earnings for graduates from selective private colleges are quickly offsetting the associated debt burden. Potentially problematic issues include a mix of high debt loads and sub-par labor market experiences for graduates from low selectivity private institutions—those that also serve a disproportionate number of nontraditional students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Angle, J., and Wissmann, D. (1981). Gender, college major, and earnings. Sociol. Educ. 54: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., and Hensen, J. W. (1977). New measures of college selectivity. Res. Higher Educ. 6: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., and Saunders, D. (1998) Life After Debt: Results of the National Student Loan Survey, Nellie Mae, Braintree, MA.

  • Becker, G. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd Ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (1988a). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 41: 418–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (1988b). Cohort size effects on earnings: Differences by college major. Econ. Educ. Rev. 8: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (1992). Private returns to specific college majors. In: Becker, W., and Lewis, D. (eds.), The Economics of American Higher Education, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 141–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., and Johnson, G. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980s: An evaluation of alternative explanations. Am. Econ. Rev. 83: 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D., and Ehrenberg, R. (1996). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence from the senior class of 1980. Res. Labor Econ. 15: 239–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D., Eide, E., and Ehrenberg, R. (1999). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Cross cohort evidence on the effects of college type on earnings. J. Hum. Resour. 34: 104–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., and Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models, Sage, Newberry Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business-Higher Education Forum (2002) Investing in People: Developing all of America's Talent on Campus and in the Workplace, Author, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board (2000). Trends in Student Aid 2000, College Entrance Examination Board, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E. (1994). College major choice and changes in the gender wage gap. Contemp. Econ. Policy 7(April): 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E. (1997). Accounting for race and gender differences in college wage premium changes. Southern Econ. J. 63: 1039–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eide, E., and Waehrer, G. (1998). The role of the option value of college attendance in college major choice. Econ. Educ. Rev. 17: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. (1993). Is it a good investment to attend an elite private college? Econ. Educ. Rev. 12: 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffen, L. J., and Alexander, K. L. (1978). Schooling and socioeconomic attainments: High school and college influences. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J., and Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. J. Hum. Resour. 30: 280–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, W. N. (1992). The economic returns to baccalaureate degrees: New evidence from the class of 1972. Rev. Higher Educ. 15: 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L., Nora, A., and Pascarella, E. (1996). Preoccupational segregation among first-year college students: An application of the Duncan dissimilarity index. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 37: 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. (1984). The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociol. Educ. 57: 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., and Thomas, S. L. (2000). An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 45: 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1980). Addendum to sample selection bias as a specification error. In: Stromsdorfer, E., and Farkas, G. (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Volume 5, San Francisco: Sage, pp. 970–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, M. (1997). Does community college attendance provide a strategic path to higher quality education? Econ. Educ. Rev. 16: 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilmer, M. (2000). Does the return to university quality differ for transfer students and direct attendees? Econ. Educ. Rev. 19: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1995). Gender and academic specialties-Trends among recipients of college degrees in the 1980s. Sociol. Educ. 68: 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J., and To, D. (1989). College quality and future earnings: Where should you send your child to college? Am. Econ. Rev. 79: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., and Jackson, J. (1990). College grades and labor market rewards. J. Hum. Resour. 25: 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhn, C., Murphy, K., and Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in the returns to skill. J. Polit. Econ. 101: 410–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A., Reskin, B., and Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65: 256–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J., and Astin, A. (1975). Social class, academic ability, and college "quality." Soc. Forces 53: 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., and Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. Q. J. Econ. 107: 35–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, P., and Smart, J. (1990). The economic payoff to prestigious colleges. In: Kinston, P., and L. Lewis (eds.), The High Status Track: Studies of Elite Private Schools and Stratification. SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 147–174.

  • Levy, F. (1998). The New Dollars and Dreams, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., and Murnane, R. (1992). U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 30: 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., and Schmitt, J. (1997). The State of Working America 1996- 1997, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. (1988). The impact of college selectivity on income for men and women. Res. Higher Educ. 29: 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., and Welch, F. (1989). Wage premiums for college graduates: recent growth and possible explanations. Educ. Res. 18(May): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1999). Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study 1993/97: Second Follow-up Methodology Report (NCES 1999159), U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwestern Lindquist-Endicott Report (1993). Northwestern University Placement Center, Chicago.

  • Polachek, S. (1981). Occupational self selections: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structures. Rev. Econ. Stat. 63: 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryer, F. L., and Schaffer, D. (1997). Wages and the university educated: A paradox resolved. Mon. Labor Rev. 120(7): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., and Bryk, A. (2001). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, 1), Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redd, K. (2001). Why do Students Borrow so Much? Recent National Trends in Student Loan Debt, ERIC Digest document number ED451 759. Available: http://ericir.syr.edu/.

  • Rumberger, R. (1983). The influence of family background on education, earnings, and wealth. Soc. Forces 61: 755–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. (1984). The changing economic benefits of college graduates. Econ. Educ. Rev. 3: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R., and Thomas, S. (1993). The economic returns to college quality, major, and performance. Econ. Educ. Rev. 12: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, P., Schweitzer, M., Serverance-Lossin, E., and Turner, E. (1996). Earnings, Education, and Experience. Economic Review Cleveland 32(4): 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. J. Off. Stat. 4: 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L., Astin, A., Korn, W., and Mahoney, K. (2002). The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2001 (Los Angeles: Cooperative Institutional Research Program, American Council on Education, and University of California).

  • Smart, J. (1988). College influences on graduates' income levels. Res. Higher Educ. 29: 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmon, L. (1973). The definition and impact of college quality. In: Solmon, L., and Taubman, P. (eds.), Does College Matter? Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmon, L. (1975). The definition of college quality and its impact on earnings. Explor. Econ. Res. 2(Fall): 537–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, R., and Relles, D. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62: 494–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2000). Deferred costs and economic returns and to college quality, major and academic performance: an analysis of recent graduates in Baccalaureate & Beyond. Res. Higher Educ. 41: 281–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., and Heck, R. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential Perils associated with complex sampling designs. Res. Higher Educ. 42: 517–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trusheim, D., and Crouse, J. (1981). Effects of college prestige on men's occupational status and income. Res. Higher Educ. 14: 283–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S., and Bowen, W. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 52: 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (1998). Student Loans: Limited Information Is Available to Determine How Students' College Debt Affects Their School and Lifestyle Decisions (GAO/HEHS-98-97R), Author, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales, T. (1973). The effects of college quality on earnings: Results from the NBERThorndike data. J. Hum. Resour. 8: 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. (1975). Academic achievement and job performance. Am. Econ. Rev. 65: 350–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott L. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, S.L. Longer-Term Economic Effects of College Selectivity and Control. Research in Higher Education 44, 263–299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023058330965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023058330965

Navigation