Skip to main content
Log in

How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology?

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) offers both an account of developmental processes and also new integrative frameworks for analyzing interactions between development and evolution. Biologists and philosophers are keen on evo-devo in part because it appears to offer a comfort zone between, on the one hand, what some take to be the relative inability of mainstream evolutionary biology to integrate a developmental perspective; and, on the other hand, what some take to be more intractable syntheses of development and evolution. In this article, I outline core concerns of evo-devo, distinguish theoretical and practical variants, and counter Sterelny's recent argument that evo-devo's attention to development, while important, offers no significant challenge to evolutionary theory as we know it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen G.E. 1986. 'T.H. Morgan and the Split Between Embryology and Genetics, 1910-35'. In: Horder T.J., Witkowski J.A. and Wylie C.C. (eds), A History of Embryology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 113–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R. 2001. 'Adaptation and Development: On the Lack of Common Ground'. In: Orzack S.H. and Sober E. (eds), Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 303–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R. 1994. 'Two Conceptions of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology'. Philosophy of Science 61: 556–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R. 1989. 'The Trials and Tribulations of Selectionist Explanations'. In: Hahlweg K. and Hooker C.A. (eds), Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • ArthurW. 2000. 'The Concept of Developmental Reprogramming and the Quest for an Inclusive Theory of Evolutionary Mechanisms'. Evolution and Development 2: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W. 1997. The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchley W.R. and Hall B.K. 1991. 'A Model for Development and Evolution of Complex Morphological Structures'. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 66: 101–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker J.A. 2000. 'Modularity in Development and Why It Matters to Evo-Devo'. American Zoologist 40: 770–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner J.T. (ed.) 1982. Evolution and Development: Report of the DahlemWorkshop on Evolution and Development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakefield P.M. 2001. 'Structure of a Character and the Evolution of Butterfly Eyespot Patterns'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 291: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakefield P.M. and French V. 1999. 'Butterfly Wings: The Evolution and Development of Colour Patterns'. BioEssays 21: 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakefield P.M., Gates J., Keys D., Kesbeke F., Wijngaarden P.J., Monteiro A. et al. 1996. 'Development, Plasticity and Evolution of Butterfly Eyespot Patterns'. Nature 384: 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brylski P. and Hall B.K. 1988a. 'Ontogeny of a Macroevolutionary Phenotype: The External Cheek Pouches of Geomyoid Rodents'. Evolution 42: 391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brylski P. and Hall B.K. 1988b. 'Epithelial Behaviors and Threshold Effects in the Development and Evolution of Internal and External Cheek Pouches in Rodents'. Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionforschung 26: 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke A.C. 1991. 'The Development and Evolution of the Turtle Body Plan: Inferring Intrinsic Aspects of the Evolutionary Process from Experimental Embryology'. American Zoologist 31: 616–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke A.C. 1989. Critical Features in Chelonian Development: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of a Unique Tetrapod Bauplan, PhD diss., Harvard University.

  • Dawkins R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D.C. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Touchstone/Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N. and Gould S.J. 1972. 'Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism'. In: Schopf T.J.M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco G. 2001. 'How Many Processes are Responsible for Phenotypic Evolution?'. Evolution & Development 3: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart J. and Kirschner M. 1997. Cells, Embryos and Evolution. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F. 2000. 'Diachronic Biology Meets Evo-Devo: C.H.Waddington's Approach to Evolutionary Developmental Biology'. American Zoologist 40: 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F. 1994. 'Dobzhansky, Waddington, and Schmalhausen: Embryology and the Modern Synthesis'. In: Adams M.B. (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky: Essays on His Life and Thought in Russia and America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F. 1978. 'The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory'. Journal of the History of Biology 11: 307–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F. and Bolker J.A. 2001. 'Homologies of Process and Modular Elements of Embryonic Construction'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 291: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F., Loredo G.A., Brukman A. and Burke A.C. 2001. 'Morphogenesis of the Turtle Shell: The Development of a Novel Structure in Tetrapod Evolution'. Evolution & Development 3: 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F., Opitz J.M. and Raff R.A. 1996. 'Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology'. Developmental Biology 173: 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S.F. and Sarkar S. 2000. 'Embracing Complexity: Organicism for the 21 Century'. Developmental Dynamics 219: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R. 1992. 'Death of the Gene: Developmental Systems Strikes Back'. In: Griffiths P.E. (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 165–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P.E. and Gray R. 1994. 'Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation'. Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B.K. 2000a. 'Evo-Devo or Devo-Evo - Does It Matter?'. Evolution & Development 2: 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B.K. 2000b. 'Balfour, Garstang and de Beer: The First Century of Evolutionary Embryology'. American Zoologist 40: 718–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B.K. 1999. Evolutionary Developmental Biology. 2nd edn. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall B.K. 1992. 'Waddington's Legacy in Development and Evolution'. American Zoologist 32: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall B.K. and Olson W.M. (eds) Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, forthcoming.

  • Jeffery W.R. 2001. 'Cavefish as a Model System in Evolutionary Developmental Biology'. Developmental Biology 231: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. 2000. The Century of the Gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. 1999. 'Understanding Development'. Biology and Philosophy 14: 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M. and Gerhart J. 1998. 'Evolvability'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.S.A. 95, pp. 8420-8427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys D.N., Lewis D.L., Selegue J.E., Pearson B.J., Goodrich L.V., Johnson R.L. et al. 1999. 'Recruitment f a Hedgehog Regulatory Circuit in Butterfly Eyespot Evolution'. Science 283: 532–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler M.D. and Wagner G.P. 2001. 'How Molecular is Molecular Developmental Biology? A Reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo'. Biology and Philosophy 16: 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C. 1970. 'The Units of Selection'. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E. 1960. 'The Emergence of Evolutionary Novelties'. In: Tax S. (ed.), Evolution After Darwin, The Evolution of Life, its Origin, History and Future Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 349–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan T.H. 1926. The Theory of the Gene. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan T.H. 1919. The Physical Basis of Heredity. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman S.A. and Muller G.B. 2000. 'Epigenetic Mechanisms of Character Origination'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 288: 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout H.F. 1996. 'Focus on Butterfly Eyespot Development'. Nature 384: 209–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama S. 2000. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Duke University Press, Durham, Rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel N.H. 1994. 'Developmental Evolution: Insights From Studies of Insect Segmentation'. Science 266: 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi E. 2000. 'Embryonic Lens Prompts Eye Development'. Science 289: 522–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M. and Schlichting C.D. 1997. 'On the Limits of Quantitative Genetics for the Study of Phenotypic Evolution'. Acta Biotheoretica 45: 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raff R.A. 1996. The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O. 2001. 'Turtles as Hopeful Monsters'. BioEssays 23: 987–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert J.S. 'Developmental Systems Theory'. In: Hall B.K. and Olson W.M. (eds), Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge forthcoming.

  • Robert J.S. 2001. 'Interpreting the Homeobox: Metaphors of Gene Action and Activation in Development and Evolution'. Evolution & Development 3: 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert J.S., Hall B.K. and Olson W.M. 2001. 'Bridging the Gap Between Developmental Systems Theory and Evolutionary Developmental Biology'. BioEssays 23: 954–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp J. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S. 1999. 'From the Reaktionsnorm to the Adaptive Norm: The Norm of Reaction, 1909-1960'. Biology and Philosophy 14: 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shishkin M.A. 1992. 'Evolution as a Maintenance of Ontogenetic Stability'. Acta Zoologica Fennica 191: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K. 2000. 'Development, Evolution, and Adaptation'. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 67: S369–S387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K. and Griffiths P.E. 1999. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K., Smith K.C. and Dickison M. 1996. 'The Extended Replicator'. Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern D.L. 2000. 'Evolutionary Developmental Biology and the Problem of Variation'. Evolution 54: 1079–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel G. 2000. 'A Mile-High View of Development'. Science 288: 2119–2120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Dassow G. and Monro E. 1999. 'Modularity in Animal Development and Evolution: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for EvoDevo'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 285: 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. 1952. The Epigenetics of Birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G.P. 2000. 'What is the Promise of Developmental Evolution? Part I: Why is Developmental Biology Necessary to Explain Evolutionary Innovations?'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular Development and Evolution) 288: pp95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G.P., Chiu C.-H. and Laubichler M. 2000. 'Developmental Evolution as a Mechanistic Science: The Inference from Developmental Mechanisms to Evolutionary Processes'. American Zoologist 40: 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss K.M. and Fullerton S.M. 2000. 'Phenogenetic Drift and the Evolution of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships'. Theoretical Population Biology 57: 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard M.-J. dy1998. 'Evolution in the Light of Developmental and Cell Biology, and ViceVersa' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 95., pp. 8417-8419.

  • Wimsatt W.C. 2001. 'Generative Entrenchment and the Developmental Systems Approach to Evolutionary Processes'. In: Oyama S., Griffiths P.E. and Gray R. (eds), Cycles of Contingency. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther R.G. 2001. 'Varieties of Modules: Kinds, Levels, Origins and Behaviors'. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 291: 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf U. 1995. 'The Genetic Contribution to the Phenotype'. Human Genetics 95: 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto Y. and Jeffrey W.R. 2000. 'Central Role for the Lens in Cave Fish Eye Degeneration'. Science 289: 631–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott Robert, J. How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology?. Biology & Philosophy 17, 591–611 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022575116251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022575116251

Navigation