Skip to main content
Log in

Linkage: From Particulate to Interactive Genetics

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetics was established on a strictparticulate conception of heredity. Geneticlinkage, the deviation from independentsegregation of Mendelian factors, was conceivedas a function of the material allocation of thefactors to the chromosomes, rather than to themultiple effects (pleiotropy) of discretefactors. Although linkage maps wereabstractions they provided strong support forthe chromosomal theory of inheritance. DirectCytogenetic evidence was scarce until X-rayinduced major chromosomal rearrangementsallowed direct correlation of genetic andcytological rearrangements. Only with thediscovery of the polytenic giant chromosomes inDrosophila larvae in the 1930s were thevirtual maps backed up by physical maps of thegenetic loci. Genetic linkage became a pivotalexperimental tool for the examination of theintegration of genetic functions in developmentand in evolution. Genetic mapping has remaineda hallmark of genetic analysis. The location ofgenes in DNA is a modern extension of thenotion of genetic linkage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G. E. 1974. “Opposition to the Mendelian-Chromosome Theory: The Physiological and Developmental Genetics of Richard Goldschmidt.” Journal of the History of Biology7: 49-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1979. “Naturalists and Experimentalists: The Genotype and the Phenotype.” In Studies in the History of Biology, eds. W. Coleman and C. Limoges, Vol. 3, pp. 179-209. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg, E. 1945. Genetics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W. and R. C. Punnett. 1911. “On Gametic Series Involving Reduplication of Certain Terms.” Journal of Genetics1(4): 293-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, W., E. R. Saunders, R. C. Punnett and C. C. Hurst. 1905. Reports to the Evolutionary Committee of the Royal Society. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G. W. and E. L. Tatum. 1941a. “Genetic Control of Biochemical Reaction in Neurospora.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington27: 499-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1941b. “Experimental Control of Development and Differentiation: Genetic Control of Developmental Reactions.” The American Naturalist75: 107-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belling, J. 1928. “A Working Hypothesis for Segmental Interchange between Homologous Chromosomes in Flowering Plants.” University of California Publications in Botany14(8): 283-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. 1916. “Non-Disjunction as Proof of the Chromosome Theory of Heredity.” Genetics1: 1-52, 107-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1917. “Deficiency.” Genetics2: 445-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1935. “Salivary Chromosome Maps.” The Journal of Heredity26: 60-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1938. “A Revised Map of the Salivary Gland X-Chromosome.” The Journal of Heredity29: 11-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. and P. N. Bridges. 1939. “A New Map of the Second Chromosome.” The Journal of Heredity30: 475-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. A., 1966(1989). The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia and London/Ames, Iowa: W. B. Saunders/Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W. E. 1919. “Is the Arrangement of the Genes in the Chromosome Linear?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington5(2): 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. 1947. “The P-Locus Position Effect in Oenothera.” Journal of Genetics48: 31-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, F. B. 1974. “William Johannsen and the Genotype Concept.” Journal of the History of Biology7: 5-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. 1970. “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science.” Centaurus15(3-4): 228-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correns, C. 1902(1924). “Scheinbare Ausnahmen von der Mendel'schen Spaltungregel für Bastarde.” Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft20(3): 159-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. 1991. Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. 1937. Recent Advances in Cytology, 2nd edn. London: J & A Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, H. 1900. “Das Spaltungsgesetz der Bastarde.” Berrichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft18: 83-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec, M. and M. E. Hoover. 1936. “Three Related X-Chromosome Deficiencies in Drosophila.” The Journal of Heredity27: 206-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M. R. 2000. “From Gene to Genetic Hierarchy: Richard Goldschmidt and the Problem of the Gene.” In The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, eds. P. J. Beurton, R. Falk and H.-J. Rheinberger, pp. 91-114. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species, 1st edn. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. 1986. “What is a Gene?” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science17(2): 133-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1991. “The Dominance of Traits in Genetic Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology24(3): 457-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1995. “The Manifest and the Scientific.” In Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, eds. S. Maasen, E. Mendelsohn and P. Weingart, pp. 57-79. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 2000. “The Gene - a Concept in Tension.” In The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives, eds. P. J. Beurton, R. Falk and H.-J. Rheinberger, pp. 317-348. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 2001a. “Mendel's Hypothesis.” In Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn, eds. G. E. Allen and R. M. MacLeod, pp. 77-86. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 2001b. “The Rise and Fall of Dominance.” Biology and Philosophy16(3): 285-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. and S. Schwartz. 1993. “Morgan's Hypothesis of the Genetic Control of Development.” Genetics134: 671-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R. 1917. “Crossing over Ohne Chiasmatypie?” Genetics2: 82-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1937. “Spontaneous Chromatin Rearrangements in Drosophila.” Nature140: 767.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1938. “The Theory of the Gene.” Scientific Monthly45: 268-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1954. “Different Philosophies of Genetics.” Science119: 703-710.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1955. Theoretical Genetics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J. B. S. 1954. The Biochemistry of Genetics. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E. and H. Bauer. 1933. “Beweise für die Chromosomennatur der Kernschleifen in den Knäuelkernen von Bibio hortulanus.” Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie17: 76-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, R. 1964. “A Mechanism for Gene Conversion in Fungi.” Genetical Research3: 472-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. L. 2000. “Seymour Benzer and the Definition of the Gene.” In The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution, eds. P. J. Beurton, R. Falk and H.-J. Rheinberger, pp. 115-155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotta, Y. and S. Benzer. 1972. “Mapping of Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.” Nature240: 527-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, C. C. 1906. Mendelian Characters in Plants and Animals. London: Royal Horticultural Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E. and S. Rachootin. 1979. “Historical Introduction.” In William Bateson: Problems of Genetics, pp. vii-xxii. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F. and J. Monod. 1961. “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology3: 318-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, F. A. 1909. “Spermatogénèse dans les Batraciens. V. La Théorie de la chiasmatypie. Nouvelle interprétation des cinèses de maturation.” La Cellule25: 389-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamrat-Lang, D. 1993. Genetics Humanized: H. J. Muller between Science and Politics 1915-1932. Dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and Experimental Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, D. 1930. “Discoid Structure of the Spireme.” The Journal of Heredity21(7): 323-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T. 1982. The Strategy of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. B. 1950. “The Phenomenon of Position Effect.” Advances in Genetics3: 73-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1951. “Pseudoallelism and Gene Evolution.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology16: 159-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. and K.-I. Kojima. 1960. “The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Polymorphism.” Evolution14(4): 458-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindegren, C. C. 1953. “Gene Conversion in Saccharomyces.” Journal of Genetics51: 625-637.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, K. and P. E. Meehl. 1948. “On Distinction between Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables.” Psychological Review55: 95-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1951. “Chromosome Organization and Genic Expression.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology16: 13-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. W. 1935. “Structure of the Salivary Gland Chromosomes in Sciara.” The Journal of Heredity26: 177-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, O. L. 1924. “A Genetic and Cytological Analysis of a Section Deficiency Involving Four Units of the X-Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.” Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre32: 108-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. V. 1922. “Non-Criss-Cross Inheritance in Drosophila melanogaster.” Biological Bulletin, Woods Hole42: 267-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. 1910. “Chromosomes and Heredity.” The American Naturalist44: 449-498.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1911. “Random Segregation versus Coupling in Mendelian Inheritance.” Science34(873): 384.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1912. “A Modification of the Sex Ratio, and of Other Ratios, in Drosophila Through Linkage.” Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre7: 323-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1913a. “Factors and Unit Characters in Mendelian Heredity.” The American Naturalist47(553): 5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1913b. Heredity and Sex. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1919. The Physical Basis of Heredity, eds. J. Loeb, T. H. Morgan and W. J. V. Osterhout, Monographs on Experimental Biology. Philadelphia and London: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1926. The Theory of the Gene. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. 1914. “A Gene for the Fourth Chromosome of Drosophila.” The Journal of Experimental Zoology17: 325-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1916. “The Mechanism of Crossing Over.” The American Naturalist50(592-595): 193- 221, 284-305, 351-366, 421-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. 1920. “Are the Factors of Heredity Arranged in a Line?” The American Naturalist54(631): 97-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1927. “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene.” Science66: 84-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1929. “The Gene as the Basis of Life.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Sciences(1): 897-921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. and T. S. Painter. 1929. “The Cytological Expression of Changes in Gene Alignment Produced by X-rays in Drosophila.” The American Naturalist63(686): 193-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, T. S. 1934a. “A New Method for the Study of Chromosome Aberrations and the Plotting of Chromosome Maps in Drosophila melanogaster.” Genetics19: 175-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1934b. “Salivary Chromosomes and the Attack on the Gene.” The Journal of Heredity25: 465-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punnett, R. C. 1913. “Reduplication Series in Sweet Peas.” Journal of Genetics3(2): 77-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1950. “Early Days of Genetics.” Heredity4(1): 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffel, D. and H. J. Muller. 1940. “Position Effect and Gene Diversity Considered in Connection with Three Strikingly Similar Scute Mutations.” Genetics25: 541-583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, N. 1978. “The Genotype Theory ofWilhelm Johannsen and Its Relation to Plant Breeding and the Study of Evolution.” Centaurus22: 201-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. 2002. “Characters as Units and the Case of the Presence and Absence Hypothesis.” Biology and Philosophy17(3): 369-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, L. J. 1954. “The Gene.” Science120: 811-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. and E. Sherwood. 1966. The Origin of Genetics: A Mendel Sourcebook. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. 1913a. “The Himalayan Rabbit Case, with Some Considerations on Multiple Allelomorphs.” The American Naturalist47: 234-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1913b. “The Linear Arrangement of Six Sex-Linked Factors in Drosophila, as Shown by Their Mode of Association.” Journal of Experimental Zoology14: 43-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1914. “The Reduplication Hypothesis as Applied to Drosophila.” The American Naturalist48: 535-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1925. “The Effects of Unequal Crossing Over at the Bar Locus in Drosophila.” Genetics10: 117-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1932. “The Use of Mosaics in the Study of the Developmental Effects of Genes.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics, Ithaca.

  • -- 1965. A Short History of Genetics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. and G.W. Beadle. 1936. “The Relations of Inversions in the X Chromosome of Drosophila melanogasterto Crossing-Over and Disjunction.” Genetics21: 554-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1962(1939). An Introduction to Genetics. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. and T. Dobzhansky. 1936. “Inversions in the Third Chromosome of Wild Races of Drosophila pseudoobscura, and Their Use in the Study of the History of the Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Washington22: 448-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoféeff-Ressovsky, N. W., E. G. Zimmer and M. Delbrück. 1935. “Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur.” Nachrichten der Biologischen Gesellschaft für Wissenschaft, Göttingen1: 189-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. L. K. 1963. “A Theory of Crossing-Over by Means of Hybrid Deoxyribonucleic Acid.” Nature199: 1034-1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. 1928(1987). The Cell in Development and Heredity, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H. 1930. Die Konversion der Gene. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falk, R. Linkage: From Particulate to Interactive Genetics. Journal of the History of Biology 36, 87–117 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022548108762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022548108762

Navigation