Abstract
Self and cross-incompatibility determination by means of fruit and seed set experiments or pollen tube growth observations in the style has been frequently reported to be unclear in pear (Pyrus communis L.). Thus,in order to develop a reliable in vivo method to test pollen-pistil incompatibility in pear, pollen tube performance has been studied along the pistil following self and cross-pollinations. Results show that, while pollen tube growth in the style may be an unclear test, ovule observation at the microscope for the presence of pollen tube in the nucellus is a proper method to test incompatibility in this crop. With this analysis we could identify S-alleles of ‘Williams’ (S1S2) and ‘Coscia’(S3S4), and three of the four possible S-genotypes resulting from the ‘Williams’ × ‘Coscia’ cross, as represented by ‘Butirra Precoz Morettini’ (S1S3), ‘Santa Maria Morettini’ (S2S3)and ‘Tosca’ (S1S4). This result demonstrates that ‘Williams’ and ‘Coscia’ cultivars do not share any allele in common. We also established two new inter-incompatibility groups in pear. Furthermore, the presence of a common allele between ‘Williams’ and ‘Agua de Aranjuez’,and ‘Coscia’ and ‘Agua de Aranjuez’, three apparently unrelated old cultivars, may indicate a narrower genetic base than expected for European pear. This finding together with the fact that 40% of new released cultivars have direct or indirect parental relationship with the cultivars ‘Coscia’ and/or ‘Williams’, anticipates the possibility of new cases of cross-incompatibility for this crop in the future. Both the method described and the determination of the S-genotypes will facilitate the characterisation of self and cross-incompatibility relationships in this species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burgos, L., O. Perez-Tornero, J. Ballester & E. Olmos, 1998. Detection and inheritance of stylar ribonucleases associated with incompatibility alleles in apricot. Sex Plant Reprod 11: 153–158.
Bellini, E., S. Sansavini, S. Lugli, S. Nini & L. Rivalta, 2000. Obiettivi innovatori del miglioramento genetico del pero nel mondo. Riv Frutt Ortofloro It 9: 56–69.
Crane, M.B. & D. Lewis, 1942. Genetical studies in pears III. Incompatibility and sterility. J Genet 43: 31–44.
Egea, J. & L. Burgos, 1996. Detecting cross-incompatibility of three North American apricot cultivars and establishing the first incompatibility group in apricot. J Am Soc Hort Sci 121: 1002–1005.
Free, J.B., 1964. Comparison of the importance of insect and wind pollination of apple trees. Nature 201: 726–727.
Griggs, W.H. & B.T. Iwakiri, 1954. Pollination and parthenocarpy in the production of Barlett pears in California. Hilgardia 22: 643–678.
Herrero, M. & H.G. Dickinson, 1979. Pollen-pistil incompatibility in Petunia hybrida: changes in the pistil following compatible and incompatible intraspecific crosses. J Cell Sci 36: 1–18.
Herrero, M. & H.G. Dickinson, 1980. Pollen tube growth following compatible and incompatible intraspecific pollination in Petunia hybrida. Planta 148: 217–221.
Hormaza J.I. & M. Herrero, 1996. Dynamics of pollen tube growth under different competition regimes. Sex Plant Reprod 9: 153–160.
Ishimizu T., K. Inoue, M. Shimonaka, T. Saito, O. Terai & S. Norioka, 1999. PCR-based method for identifying the S-genotypes of Japanese pear cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 961–967.
Janssens G.A., I.J. Goderis, W.F. Broekaert & W. Broothaerts, 1995. A molecular method for S-allele identification in apple based on allele-specific PCR. Theor Appl Genet 91: 691–698.
Jefferies, C.J. & A.R. Belcher, 1974. A fluorescent brightener used for pollen tube identification in vivo. Stain Technology 49: 199–202.
Johansen, D.A., 1940. Plant Microtechnique. In: McGraw-Hill (Ed.), New York, New York, Estados Unidos.
Kester, D.E., T.M. Gradziel & W.C. Micke, 1994. Identifying pollen incompatibility groups in California almond cultivar. J Am Soc Hort Sci 119: 106–109.
Le Lézec, M., 1998. Pollinisation du poirer. L'arboriculture Fruitiè re 520: 37–40.
Lewis, D., 1942. The physiology of incompatibility in plants. I. The effect of temperature on pollen tube growth. Proc Royal Soc London, Ser B Biol. Sci 131: 13–26.
Lewis, D. & I. Modlibowska, 1942. Genetical studies in pears IV. Pollen-tube growth and incompatibility. J Genet 43: 211–222.
Linskens, H.F. & K. Esser, 1957. Uber eine spezifische Anfärbung der Pollen-shläuche und die Zagl Kallosapropten nach selbstung und fremdung. Naturwiss 44: 16.
Modlibowska, I. 1945. Pollen tube growth and embryo-sac development in apples and pears. J Pomol 21: 57–89.
Morettini, A., 1957. La coltura del pero in Italia. Il miglioramento genetico. Riv Ortofloro-frutt It 41: 26–40.
Morettini, A., E. Baldini, F. Scaramuzzi & L. Mittempergher 1967. Monografia delle principali cultivar di pero. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Firenze.
de Nettancourt, D., 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. In: Springer-Verlag (Ed.), Berlin, Alemania.
Nicotra, A., D. Cobianchi, W. Faedi & P. Manzo, 1979. Monografia di cultivar di pero. Ministero dell'Agricoltura e delle Foreste Direzione Generale della Produzione Agricola, Roma.
Nyeki J., M. Soltesz & J. Ivancsics, 2000. Self-fertility of pear varieties conditioned by natural self-pollination (autogamy). Int J Hort Sci 6: 110–113.
Tamura, M., K. Ushijima, H. Sassa, H. Hirano, R. Tao, T.M. Gradziel & A.M. Dandekar, 2000. Identification of selfincompatibility genotypes of almond by allele specific PCR analysis. Theor Appl Genet 101: 344–349.
Tassinari, P., S. Zuccherelli & S. Sansavini, 2001. Contributo allo studio delle basi biologico-molecolari dell’ incompatibilità gametofitica del pero (Pyrus communis L.). Riv Frutt Ortofloro 6: 81–86.
Tehrani, G. & S.K. Brown, 1992. Pollen-incompatibility and selffertility in sweet cherry. Plant Breed Rev 9: 367–388.
Tehrani G. & J.W. Lay, 1988. Verification of pedigrees of different sweet cherry cultivars introduced from Vineland through pollen compatibility studies. HortScience 23: 783.
Terami H., H. Torikata & Y. Shimazu, 1946. Analysis of the sterility factors existing in varieties of Japanese pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.). Studies Hortic Inst Kioto Imp Univ 3: 267–271.
Tomimoto, Y., T. Nakazaki, H. Ikehashi, H. Ueno & R. Hayashi, 1996. Analysis of self-incompatibility-related ribonucleases (SRNases) in two species of pears, Pyrus communis and Pyrus ussuriensis. Sci Hort 66: 159–167.
Wiersma, P.A., Z. Wu, L. Zhou, C. Hampson & F. Kappel, 2001. Identification of new self-incompatibility alleles in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) and clarification of incompatibility groups by PCR and sequencing analysis. Theor Appl Genet 102: 700–708.
Zhang, S. & S. Hiratsuka, 2000. Cultivar and developmental differences in S-protein concentration and self-incompatibility in the Japanese pear. HortScience 35: 917–920.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanzol, J., Herrero, M. Identification of self-incompatibility alleles in pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.). Euphytica 128, 325–331 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021213905461
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021213905461