Skip to main content
Log in

Superlative Expressions, Context, and Focus

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Beck, S.: 1996, ‘Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement’ Natural Language Semantics 4, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J.: 1973, ‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 4(3), 275–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’ Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’ in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 232–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1977, ‘On wh-Movement’ in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M.: 1976, ‘The Semantics of Degree’ in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 261–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, M.: 1981, Tense without Scope: An Analysis of Nouns as Indexicals, PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, H.: 1992, ‘Intervention Effects, Monotonicity and Scope’ in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II (Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 40), Ohio State University, pp. 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. and K. E. Kiss: 2000, ‘On the Comparative and Absolute Readings of Superlatives’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3), 417–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K.: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G.: 1979, Pragmatics; Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1985, Notes on Comparatives and Related Matters, manuscript, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1994, ‘Superlatives: A Case Study in the Division of Labor between Syntax and Pragmatics’.

  • Heim, I.: 1998, Negative Decomposition and Comparatives, Colloquium, University of Connecticut.

  • Heim, I.: 1999, Notes on Superlatives, manuscript, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 2000, ‘Degree Operators and Scope’ in Proceedings of SALT X, CLC Publications, Cornell University, pp. 40–64.

  • Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell Publishers.

  • Honcoop, Martin: 1998, Dynamic Excursions on Weak Islands, PhD dissertation, Leiden University.

  • Horn, L. R.: 1972, On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, PhD dissertation, UCLA.

  • Horn, L. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 1992, ‘The Said and the Unsaid’ in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory.

  • Jacobson, P.: 1994, ‘Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences’ in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV, CLC Publications, Cornell University, pp. 161–178.

  • Kennedy, C.: 1997, Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, PhD Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.: 2001, ‘Polar Opposition and the Ontology of ‘Degrees’ ’, Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 33–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K.: 1998, ‘Identification Focus Versus Information Focus’ Language 74(2), 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, C.: 2001, ‘Modality in Comparative Constructions’ in R. v. Rooy and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings from the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam.

  • Musan, R.: 1995, On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’ in J. Groenendijk et al.(eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1992, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’ Natural Language Semantics 75–116.

  • Ross, J. R.: 1964, A Partial Grammar of English Superlatives, MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, H.: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of wh-Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. and K. Willkinson: to appear, ‘Quantifiers in Comparatives: A Semantics of Degrees Based on Intervals’ Natural Language Semantics.

  • Seuren, P. A. M.: 1973, ‘The Comparative’ in F. Kiefer and N. Ruwet (eds.), Generative Grammar in Europe, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stateva, P.: 2000, ‘In Defense of the Movement Theory of Superlatives’ in R. Daly and A. Riehl (eds), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1999, pp. 215–226.

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, PhD dissertation, Tuebingen University.

  • von Stechow, A.: 1984, ‘Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison’ J. Semantics 3, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1986, ‘Comparative Superlatives’ in N. Fukui et al. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 8, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharvit, Y., Stateva, P. Superlative Expressions, Context, and Focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 453–504 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020875809794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020875809794

Keywords

Navigation