Skip to main content
Log in

Footprint handover rerouting protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks will be an integral part of the next generation telecommunications infrastructures. In a LEO satellite network, satellites and their individual coverage areas move relative to a fixed observer on Earth. To ensure that ongoing calls are not disrupted as a result of satellite movement, calls should be transferred or handed over to new satellites. Since two satellites are involved in a satellite handover, connection route should be modified to include the new satellite into the connection route. The route change can be achieved by augmenting the existing route with the new satellite or by completely rerouting the connection. Route augmentation is simple to implement, however the resulting route is not optimal. Complete rerouting achieves optimal routes at the expense of signaling overhead. In this paper, we introduce a handover rerouting protocol that maintains the optimality of the initial route without performing a routing algorithm after intersatellite handovers. The FHRP makes use of the footprints of the satellites in the initial route as the reference for rerouting. More specifically, after an optimum route has been determined during the call establishment process, the FHRP ensures that the new route due to handover is also optimum. The FHRP demands easy processing, signaling, and storage costs. The performance results show that the FHRP performs similar to a network without any handovers in terms of call blocking probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.A. Akyol and D.C. Cox, Rerouting for handoff in a wireless ATM networks, IEEE Personal Communications 3(5) (October 1996) 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager, Data Networks(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Carter and M.A. Beach, Evaluation of handover mechanisms in shadowed low Earth orbit land mobile satellite systems, International Journal of Satellite Communications 13 (1995) 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.S. Chang, B.W. Kim, C.G. Lee, Y.H. Choi, S.L. Min, H.S. Yang and C.S. Kim, Topological design and routing for low-Earth orbit satellite networks, in: Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM(1995) pp. 529–535.

  5. E. Del Re, R. Fantacci and G. Giambene, Handover requests queueing in low Earth orbit mobile satellite systems, in: Proc. of the 2nd European Workshop on Mobile/Personal Satcoms(1996) pp. 213–232.

  6. F. Dosiere, T. Zein, G. Maral and J.P. Boutes, A model for the handover traffic in low Earth-orbiting (LEO) satellite networks for personal communications, International Journal of Satellite Communications 11 (1993) 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.Y. Eng, M.J. Karol, M. Veeraraghavan, E. Ayanoglu, C.B. Woodworth, P. Pancha and R.A. Valenzuela, A wireless broadband ad-hoc ATM local area network, Wireless Networks 1(2) (1995) 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ganz, Y. Gong and B. Li, Performance study of low Earth-orbit satellite systems, IEEE Transactions on Communications 42(2/3/4) (February/March/April 1994) 1866–1871.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.R. Giusto and G. Quaglione, Technical alternatives for satellite mobile networks, in: Proc. of the 1st European Workshop on Mobile/ Personal Satcoms(1994) pp. 15–27.

  10. J.L. Grubb, IRIDIUM overview, IEEE Communications Magazine 29(11) (1991).

  11. Y.C. Hubbel, A comparison of the IRIDIUM and AMPS systems, IEEE Network Magazine 11(2) (March/April 1997) 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Sturza, Architecture of the TELEDESIC satellite system, in: Proc. of Int. Mobile Satellite Conference(1995) pp. 212–218.

  13. C. Toh, The design and implementation of a hybrid handover protocol for multimedia wireless LANs, in: Proc. of MOBICOM '95 (1995) pp. 49–61.

  14. H. Uzunalioğlu, Probabilistic routing protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks, in: IEEE ICC '98 (1998) pp. 88–93.

  15. M. Werner, C. Delucchi, H.-J. Vogel, G. Maral and J.-J. De Ridder, ATM-based routing in LEO/MEO satellite networks with intersatellite links, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 15(1) (January 1997) 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Werner, A. Jahn, E. Lutz and A. Bottcher, Analysis of system parameters for LEO/ICO-satellite communication networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 13(2) (February 1995) 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.A. Wiedeman and A.J. Viterbi, The Globalstar mobile satellite system for worldwide personal communications, in: Proc. of Int. Mobile Satellite Conference(1993) pp. 46–49. H. Uzunalioğlu et al. / Footprint handover rerouting protocol for LEO satellite networks 337

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uzunalioğlu, H., Akyildiz, I.F., Yesha, Y. et al. Footprint handover rerouting protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks. Wireless Networks 5, 327–337 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019127801155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019127801155

Keywords

Navigation