Abstract
This paper discusses model building for discrete choice problems in the simplest case - the logit model. General model building principles are formulated and used in evaluatingways of deriving logit choice probabilities. The principles include that models should representhuman behavior, and that the basic assumptions should be testable and refutable againstobservations. Three ways of deriving the logit model are considered; the Luce model, theadditive random utility maximizing approach, and the efficiency approach. The equivalenceof the logit formula and the independence of irrelevant alternatives assumption (the Lucemodel) is well known. It is also well known that the assumption of additive random utilitymaximization with extreme value distribution for the unobservable stochastic componentsimplies the logit formula. The opposite implication does not hold. The principal merit ofadditive random utility maximizing is its coherence with standard economic theory. Itsprincipal weakness is that the basic assumptions can not be tested, since the stochasticcomponents cannot be observed. The efficiency assumption - samples with higher totalobservable utility are more probable - is equivalent to the logit formula. The advantage ofthe efficiency approach lies in its simple, testable basic behavioral assumptions. The independenceof irrelevant alternatives assumption is equivalent to the efficiency assumption.The additive random utility maximization approach and the efficiency approach are notequivalent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Anas, Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models, Transportation Research 17B(1983)13 – 23.
R.E. Barlow and F. Proschan, Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1975.
F.R. Clarke, Constant-ratio rule for confusion matrices in speech communication, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29(1957)715– 720.
R.A. Cochrane, A possible economic basis for the gravity model, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 9(1975)34 – 49.
T.A. Domenich and D. McFadden, Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis, vol. 93 of Contributions to Economic Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
S. Erlander, Accessibility, entropy and distribution and assignment of traffic, Transportation Research 11(1977)149 – 153.
S. Erlander, On the principle of monotone likelihood and log-linear models, Mathematical Programming Study 25(1985)108 – 123.
S. Erlander, Efficient population behavior and the simultaneous choices of origins, destinations and routes, Transportation Research 24B(1990)363 – 373.
S. Erlander and J.T. Lundgren, Spatial price equilibrium and efficiency, Report LiTH-MAT-R-1992-39, Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1992.
S. Erlander and T.E. Smith, General representation theorems for efficient population behavior, Applied Mathematics and Computation 36(1990)173 – 217.
S. Erlander and N.F. Stewart, The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis – Theory and Extensions, VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
R.A. Fisher and L.H.C. Tippett, Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample, Proceedings Cambridge Philos. Soc., 24(1928)180 – 190.
B.V. Gnedenko, Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une série aléatoire, Ann. of Math. 44(1943)423 – 453.
J. Hausman and D. McFadden, Specification tests for the multinomial logit model, Econometrica 52(1984)1219 – 1240.
G. Leonardi, The structure of random utility models in the light of the asymptotic theory of extremes, in: Transportation Planning Models, ed. M. Florian, Elsevier Science, 1984.
P.O. Lindberg, E.A. Eriksson and L.-G. Mattsson, Invariance of achieved utility, Environment and Planning A27(1995)121 – 142.
R.D. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1959.
R.D. Luce and P. Suppes, Preference, utility and subjective probability, in: Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 3, eds. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush and E. Galanter, Wiley, 1965, pp. 249– 410.
J.T. Lundgren, Optimization approaches to travel demand modelling, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden, 1989.
J.T. Lundgren and M. Patriksson, The combined distribution and stochastic assignment problem, Annals of Operations Research (1998), this volume.
D. McFadden, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in: Frontiers of Econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka, Academic Press, New York, 1973, pp. 105 – 142.
D. McFadden, Modeling the choice of residential location, in: Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, ed. A. Karlqvist, North-Holland, 1978, pp. 75 – 96.
D. McFadden, Econometric models of probabilistic choice, in: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, eds. C. Manski and D. McFadden, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981, pp. 198 – 272.
K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper and Row, New York, 1968.
Y. Sheffi, Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985.
T.E. Smith, A cost-efficiency principle of spatial interaction behavior, Regional Science and Urban Economics 8(1978)313 – 337.
T.E. Smith, A cost-efficiency approach to the analysis of congested spatial-interaction behavior, Environment and Planning A15(1983)435 – 464.
T.E. Smith, A choice probability characterization of generalized extreme value models, Applied Mathematics and Computation 14(1984)35 – 62.
T.E. Smith, A cost-efficiency theory of dispersed network equilibria, Environment and Planning 20A(1988)231 – 261.
L.L. Thurstone, A law of comparative judgment, Psychological Review 34(1927)273–286.
A.G. Wilson, Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling, Pion, London, 1970.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erlander, S. Efficiency and the logit model. Annals of Operations Research 82, 203–218 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018906618608
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018906618608