Abstract
Researchers examined the influence of victimdress, perceiver gender, situational relevance, andpersonal relevance on attributions of responsibility fordate rape. Participants were from a campus population described as 75% White non-Hispanic, 14% Blacknon-Hispanic, 2% Asian, 2% Hispanic, 4% nonresidentaliens, and 3% other, and were characterized asprimarily middle class. Participants read a date rapescenario, viewed a photograph of the victim, attributedresponsibility to victim and perpetrator, and estimatedsituational relevance and personal relevance.Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) indicated a significant difference between groups(perceiver gender, victim dress) on the two dependentvariables (responsibility of victim and perpetrator) andthe covariates. There were significant differences in attribution of responsibility to the femalevictim due to perceiver gender, victim dress, and thecovariate personal relevance, accounting for a smallproportion of variance. Men attributed moreresponsibility to the victim than women. Both men and womenwho viewed a photograph of the victim in a short skirtattributed more responsibility to the victim than thosewho viewed a photograph of the victim in a moderate or long skirt. As womens' personal relevanceincreased, attribution of responsibility to the victimdecreased. Men attributed less responsibility to themale perpetrator than women. As mens' situational relevance increased, attribution ofresponsibility to the perpetrator decreased. Presumably,participants' attributed responsibility was motivated byblame avoidance. Theoretical and practical implications are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Amick, A., & Calhoun, K. (1987). Resistance of sexual aggression: Personality, attitudinal, and situational factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16(2), 153–163.
Best, J., & Kahn, J. (1998). Research in education (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.
Bridges, J. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24(56), 291–307.
Calhoun, K., & Townsley, R. (1991). Attributions of re sponsibility for acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 57–70). New York: Wiley.
Cassidy, L., & Hurrell, R. (1995). The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30(118), 319–323.
Chaikin, A. L., & Darley, J. M. (1973). Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 268–275.
Dull, R., & Giacopassi, D. (1987). Demographic corre lates of sexual and dating attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14(2), 175–193.
Enrollment classification of students' ethnic origin. (1998). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University, Office of Admissions and Re cords.
Fairstein, L. (1993). Sexual violence: Our war against rape. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Feild, H. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counse lors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), 156–179.
Fulero, S., & Delara, C. (1976). Rape victims and attributed responsibility: A defensive attribution approach. Victimology: An International Journal, 1(4), 551–563.
Harris, L. (1996, Septembe r 22). The hidden world of dating violence. Parade, pp. 4–6.
Holcomb, D., Holcomb, L., Sondag, K., & Williams, N. (1991). Attitudes about date rape: Gender difference s among college students. College Student Journal, 25(4), 434–439.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) survey. (1999). Carbondale: Southe rn Illinois Univrsity, Institutional Research and Studies.
Kanekar, S., & Kolsawalla, M. (1980). Responsibility of a rape victim in relation to her re spectability, attractiveness, and provocativeness. The Jo urn al of Social Psychology, 112, 153–154.
Koss, M. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggre ssion and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault (Vol. 2, pp. 3–25). New York: Garland.
Koss, M., Leonard, K., Beezley, D., & Oros, C. (1985). Nonstrange r sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12(9/10), 981–992.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A re search instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.
Krulewitz, J. (1982). Reactions to rape victims: Effects of rape circumstance s, victim's emotional re sponse, and sex of helper. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(6), 645–654.
Langley, T., Beatty, G., Yost, E., O'Neal, E., Faucett, J., Taylor, S., Franke l, P., & Craig, K. 1991). How behavioral cue s in a date rape scenario influence judgments regarding victim and perpetrator. Forensic Reports, 4(3), 355–358.
Miller, B., & Marshall, J. (1987). Coercive sex on the university campus. Journal of College Student Personnel, 93(2), 216–221.
Muehlenhard, C. (1988). Misinterpreted dating behaviors and the risk of date rape. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 20–37.
Muehlenhard, C., Friedman, D., & Thomas, C. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 297–310.
Muehlenhard, C., & Hollabaugh, L. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.
Muehlenhard, C., & Linton, M. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(2), 186–196.
Muehlenhard, C., & MacNaughton, J. (1988). Women's beliefs about women who ``lead men on”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 65–79.
Newman, B., & Colon, I. (1994). Beliefs about rape among college males: A revision of the rape myth acceptance scale. College Student Journal, 28(1), 10–17.
Quackenbush, R. (1991). Attitudes of college men toward women and rape. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 376–377.
Richards, L., Rollerson, B., & Phillips, J. (1991). Perceptions of submissiveness: Implications for victimization. The Journal of Psychology, 125(4), 407–411.
Shaver, K.G. (1970).Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned to an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 380–383.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tieger, T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 147–158.
White, J., & Humphrey, J. (1991). Young people's attitudes toward acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 96–111). New York: Wiley.
Williams, N. (1989, October 10). Date rape devastates victim by violating sense of trust. Daily Egyptian, p. 6.
Workman, J., & Orr, R. (1996).Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14(4), 276–284.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Workman, J.E., Freeburg, E.W. An Examination of Date Rape, Victim Dress, and Perceiver Variables Within the Context of Attribution Theory. Sex Roles 41, 261–277 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018858313267
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018858313267