Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Tools for the Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe the use of modern numerical integration methods for making posterior inferences in composed error stochastic frontier models for panel data or individual cross- sections. Two Monte Carlo methods have been used in practical applications. We survey these two methods in some detail and argue that Gibbs sampling methods can greatly reduce the computational difficulties involved in analyzing such models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Productions Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.W. (1990). “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck, J., G. Koop, J. Osiewalski, and M. Steel. (1994). “Stochastic Frontier Models: A Bayesian Perspective.” Journal of Econometrics 61, 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B., N. Polson, and D. Stoffer. (1992). “A Monte Carlo Approach to Nonnormal and Nonlinear State-Space Modelling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87, 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., and E. George. (1992). “Explaining the Gibbs Sampler.” The American Statistician 46, 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. (1995). “Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1313–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devroye, L. (1986). Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, C., J. Osiewalski, and M. F. J. Steel. (1997). “On the Use of Panel Data in Stochastic Frontier Models with Improper Priors.” Journal of Econometrics 79, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., and D. K. Dey. (1994). “Bayesian Model Choice: Asymptotics and Exact Calculations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Ser. B 56, 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., and A. F. M. Smith. (1990). “Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., and D. Rubin. (1992). “A Single Series from the Gibbs Sampler Provides a False Sense of Security.” In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1989). “Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration.” Econometrica 57, 1317–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1991). “Efficient Simulation from the Multivariate Normal and Student-t Distributions Subject to Linear Constraints.” In E. M. Keramidas and S. M. Kaufman (eds.), Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface. Interface Foundation of North America.

  • Geweke, J. (1992). “Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments.” In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1995). “Posterior Simulators in Econometrics.” Working paper 555. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

  • Greene,W. H. (1990). “A Gamma-Distributed Stochastic Frontier Model.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, S. E., and A. F. M. Smith. (1992). “Parameterization Issues in Bayesian Inference.” In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski, and M. F. J. Steel. (1994). “Bayesian Efficiency Analysis with a Flexible Form: The AIM Cost Function.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski, and M. F. J. Steel. (1997a). “The Components of Output Growth: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” Manuscript.

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski, and M. F. J. Steel. (1997b). “Modeling the Sources of Output Growth in a Panel of Countries.” Manuscript.

  • Koop, G., J. Osiewalski, and M. F. J. Steel. (1997c). “Bayesian Efficiency Analysis through Individual Effects: Hospital Cost Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 76, 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., M. F. J. Steel, and J. Osiewalski. (1995). “Posterior Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models Using Gibbs Sampling.” Computational Statistics 10, 353–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (1997). “Modeling Allocative Inefficiency in a Translog Cost Function and Cost Share Equations: An Exact Relationship.” Journal of Econometrics 76, 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, E., and M. F. J. Steel. (1992). “Bayesian Econometrics: Conjugate Analysis and Rejection Sampling Using Mathematica.” In H. Varian (ed.), Economic and Financial Modeling Using Mathematica, Chapter 15. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review 8, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., and A. F. M. Smith. (1982). “Applications of a Method for the Efficient Computation of Posterior Distributions.” Applied Statistics 31, 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M., and A. Raftery. (1994). “Approximate Bayesian Inference by the Weighted Likelihood Bootstrap.” With discussion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 56, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, A. (1994). Bayesian Inference. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M., and L. F. Lee. (1981). “The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry.” Journal of Development Economics 9, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A., and S. Lewis. (1992). “How Many Iterations in the Gibbs Sampler?” In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1987). Stochastic Simulation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C. (1993). “The Normal-Gamma Frontier Model under a Common Vague Prior Does not Produce a Proper Posterior.” Manuscript.

  • Ritter, C., and L. Simar. (1997). “Pitfalls of Normal-Gamma Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C., and M. A. Tanner. (1992). “Facilitating the Gibbs Sampler: The Gibbs Stopper and the Griddy-Gibbs Sampler.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87, 861–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P., and R. C. Sickles. (1984). “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. F. M., and A. E. Gelfand. (1992). “Bayesian Statistics without Tears: A Sampling-Resampling Perspective.” The American Statistician 46, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. A. (1991). Tools for Statistical Inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. A., and W. H. Wong. (1987). “The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 528–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1994). “Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions.” With discussion. Annals of Statistics 22, 1701–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L., and J. B. Kadane. (1986). “Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeger, S., and M. Karim. (1991). “Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: A Gibbs Sampling Approach.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., and C. Min. (1995). “Gibbs Sampler Convergence Criteria.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 921–927.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osiewalski, J., Steel, M.F.J. Numerical Tools for the Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis 10, 103–117 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018302600587

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018302600587

Navigation