Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mutation and selection within the individual

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection within the individual may have played a critical and creative role in evolution, boosting the survival chances of mutations beneficial to the cell and the individual, hindering the spread of deleterious mutations, and reducing the genetic load imposed on the population. We review the literature and present new results to describe the effects of cell-lineage selection on the rate and fixation probability of new mutations. Cell-lineage selection can alter these quantities by several orders of magnitude. Cell-lineage selection is especially important in the case of rare recessive mutations, which are hidden from selection at the individual level but may be exposed to selection at the cellular level. Because selection within the individual acts as a sieve eliminating deleterious mutations and increasing the frequency of beneficial ones, mutations observed among progeny will have been pre-selected and are more likely to increase cell proliferation than would randomly generated mutations. Although many authors have focused on the potential conflict between selection at the cellular and individual levels, it must be much more common that the two levels act concordantly. When selection at the cell and individual levels act in a cooperative manner, increased rather than decreased opportunity for germline selection will be favored by evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.F., 1996. Separate sexes and the mitochondrial theory of ageing. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 135-140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antolin, M.F. & C. Strobeck, 1985. The population genetics of somatic mutations in plants. Am. Nat. 126: 52-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengttson, B.O., 1970. The effect of biased gene conversion on the mutation load. Genet. Res. 55:183-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birky, C. W., Jr., 1991. Evolution and population genetics of organelle genes: mechanisms and models, pp. 112-134 in Evolution at the Molecular Level, edited by R.K. Selander, A.G. Clark and T.S. Whittam. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L.W., 1982. Somatic cell parasitism and the evolution of somatic tissue compatibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 5337-5341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L.W., 1983. Evolution, development, and the units of selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 1387-1391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L.W., 1987. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanee, W.K., T.P. Dryja, R.A. Phillips, W.F. Benedict, R. Godbout, B.L. Gallie, A.L. Murphree, L.C. Strong & R.L. White, 1983. Expression of recessive alleles by chromosomal mechanisms in retinoblastoma. Nature 305: 779-784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F., 1970. Genetic loads and the cost of natural selection, pp. 159-168 in Mathematical Topics in Population Genetics, edited by K. Kojima. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J F. & M. Kimura, 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drost, J. & W. Lee, 1998. The developmental basis for germline mosaicism in mice and Drosophila. Genetica: 102/103: 421443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.A. & E.F. Paddock, 1979. Mitotic crossing-over in plants, pp. 315-351 in Plant Cell and Tissue Culture, Principles and Applications, edited by W.R. Sharp, P.O. Larsen, E.F. Paddock, and V. Raghavan. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W.J., 1979. Mathematical Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke, U., R.M. Winter, D. Lin, B. Backay, J.E. Seegmiller & W.L. Nyhan, 1981. Use of carrier detection tests to estimate male to female ratio of mutation rates in Lesch-Nyhan disease, pp. 117- 130 in Population and Biological Aspects of Human Mutation, edited by E.B. Hook & I.H. Porter. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A., 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature 377: 520-522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French, D L., R. Laskov & M.D. Scharff, 1989. The role of somatic hypermutation in the generation of antibody diversity. Science 244: 1152-1157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaul, H., 1958. Present aspects of induced mutations in plant breeding. Euphytica 7: 275-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethman, R.C., 1988. Crossing over in males of higher Diptera (Brachycera). J. Hered. 79: 344-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E. & T.G. Halverson, 1984. Fitness variation among branches within trees, pp. 105-116 in Evolutionary Ecology, edited by B. Shorrocks. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E., 1987. Intraplant genetic variability (topic of a roundtable discussion), pp. 269-275 in Series Entomological (The Hague) V. 41. Insects Plants, edited by V. Labeyrie, G. Fabres, and D. Luchaise. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D.E., L. Chao, S.L. Perkins & J.B. Wolf, 1995. Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 423-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J.H., 1981. Mutation modification in a random environment. Evolution 35: 468-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S., 1927. Amathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. V. Selection and mutation. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23: 838-844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S., 1937. The effect of variation on fitness. Am. Nat. 71: 337-349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S., 1957. The cost of natural selection. J. of Genetics 55: 511-524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D.L. & A.G. Clark, 1989. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, I.M., 1989. Potential germline competition in animals and its evolutionary implications. Genetics 123: 191-197.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, I.M., 1991. Germline selection: population genetics of the sexual/asexual lifecycle. Genetics 129: 1167-1176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, I.M., 1994. Selfish DNA as a method of pest control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 344: 313-324.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John, B. & G.L. Miklos, 1988. The Eukaryotic Genome in Development and Evolution. Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1962. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47: 713-719.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1964. Diffusion models in population genetics. J. Appl. Prob. 1:177-232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klekowski, E.J., Jr., 1988. Mutation, Developmental Selection, and Plant Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klekowski, E.J., Jr. & N. Kazarinova-Fukshansky, 1984. Shoot apical meristems and mutation: Selective loss of disadvantageous cell genotypes. Amer. J. Botany 71: 28-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D.E. & C.A. Coulson, 1949. The distribution of the numbers of mutations in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49: 264-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W.H. & D. Graur, 1991. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, U., & M.W. Feldman, 1986. Modifiers of mutation rate: A general reduction principle. Theor. Pop. Biol. 30: 125-142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichten, M. & J.E. Haber, 1989. Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 123: 261-268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, S. & M. Delbrück, 1943. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28: 491-511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. & W. Gabriel, 1990. Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44: 1725-1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. & E. Szathmáry, 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. W. H. Freeman and Co., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod, R.E., 1996. Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. II. Conflict mediation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263: 813-822.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michod, R.E., 1997. Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. I. Multilevel selection of the organism. Am. Nat. 149: 607-645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata, T., H. Hayashida, K. Kuma, K. Mitsuyasa & T. Yasunaga, 1987. Male-driven molecular evolution: A model and nucleotide sequence analysis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52: 863-867.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T., 1953. Some effects of variations in the segregation ratio and of selection on the frequency of alleles under random mating (Appendix to L. C. Dunn). Acta Genet. 4:148-151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, S.P. & M.E. Orive, 1995. Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141: 1173-1187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, S.P. & V. Walbot, 1990. DNA methylation in eukaryotes: Kinetics of demethylation and de novo methylation during the life cycle. Genetics 124: 429-437.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R.J., 1994. Male mutation rates and the cost of sex for females. Nature 369: 145-147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, L. & E. Novitski, 1957. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am. Nat. 91: 105-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimmin, L.C., B.H.J. Chang & W.H. Li, 1993. Male-driven evolution of DNA sequences. Nature 362: 745-747.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Short, R.V., 1993. Why sex?, pp. 3-22 in The Differences between the Sexes, edited by R.V. Short & E. Balaban. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M., 1984. Somatic mutations as an evolutionary force, pp. 19-30 in Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, edited by P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey and M. Slatkin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelker, R.A., H.E. Schaffer & T. Muhai, 1980. Spontaneous allozyme mutations in Drosophila melanogaster: Rate of occurrence and nature of the mutants. Genetics 94: 961-968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, F. & R. Rathenberg, 1975. Spontaneous mutations in man. Adv. Hum. Genet. 5: 223-318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitham, T.G. & C.N. Slobodchikoff, 1981. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: The adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49: 287-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C., 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels and Challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R.M., E.G.D. Tuddenham, E. Goldman & K.B. Matthews, 1983. A maximum likelihood estimate of the sex ratio of mutation rates in Haemophilia A. Hum. Genet. 64: 156-159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R.C. & J.N. Thompson Jr., 1992. Have premeiotic clusters of mutation been overlooked in evolutionary theory? J. Evol. Biol. 5: 457-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R.C., H. Huai & J.N. Thompson Jr., 1996. Clusters of identical new mutation in the evolutionary landscape. Genetica 98: 149-160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L.W. & R.L. Keil, 1990. Distance-independence of mitotic intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124: 263-273.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4

    Sarah P. Otto

  2. Institute of Cell, Animal, and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK

    Ian M. Hastings

Authors
  1. Sarah P. Otto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian M. Hastings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otto, S.P., Hastings, I.M. Mutation and selection within the individual. Genetica 102, 507–524 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017074823337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017074823337

Search

Navigation