Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predator–prey ratios on cocoa along a land-use gradient in Indonesia

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical landscapes are dominated by agroecosystems, but the potential value of agroecosystems for the survival of species is often overlooked. In agroecosystems, species conservation is especially important when functional groups such as predators are affected. In Central Sulawesi, we sampled arthropods on cocoa in a gradient of land-use intensity from extensively used forest gardens to intensively used agroforestry systems. The abundance and diversity of all arthropods did not correlate with land-use intensity, so human impact was not followed by high species losses. However, the number of species and abundance of the phytophagous arthropods increased and that of the entomophagous arthropods decreased with land-use intensity. The reduced predator–prey ratio in intensified systems can be related to their reduced species richness of shade trees and the changed microclimate (increased temperature, decreased humidity and canopy cover). In conclusion, transformation of traditional into intensified agroforestry systems had a great impact on arthropod community structure on cocoa. Since predator–prey ratios decreased with increasing land-use intensity, local farmers should have least pest problems in the traditionally diversified agroforestry systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer J (1987) Advantages, disadvantages and desirable characteristics of shade trees for coffee, cacao and tea. Agroforestry Systems 5: 3-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett A and Rosenheim JA (1996) Impact of natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecological Entomology 21: 155-164

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenko J,M atson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D and Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology 2: 2-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE and Davis A (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends of Ecology and Evolution 11: 255-260

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald J, Dwight M and Charles A (1981) The Introduction to the Study of Insects. CBS College Publishing, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K (1996) Interactions between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Peninsular Malaysia. In: Edwards DS et al. (eds) Tropical Rainforest Research, Current Issues, pp 291-296. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Cruz Angon A, MacVean C, Perez R and Cano E (2000) The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some Guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81: 1750-1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven LGE (1981) Pest of crops in Indonesia. PT Ichtiar Baru-Van Hoeve, Jalan Majapahit 6, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein A-M, Steffan-Dewenter J and Tscharntke T (2001) Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps(submitted to Conservation Biology)

  • Laurance VF and Bierregaard Jr RO (1997) Tropical Forest Remnants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS and Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72-76

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston D (1970) Entomology of the cocoa farm. Annual Review of Entomology 15: 273-294

    Google Scholar 

  • Manugistics (1996) Statgraphics plus for Windows 3.0 Manugistics Inc

  • Moguel P and Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservations in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 11-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JO and Beattie AJ (1996) Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications 6: 594-607

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I (1990) Indirect and direct effects in a tropical agroecosystem: the maize-pest-ant system in Nicaragua. Ecology 71: 2125-2134

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R and Van der Voort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Shade coffee plantations can contain as much biodiversity as forest habitats. BioScience 46: 598-608

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I and Vandermeer J (1996) Microclimatic changes and the indirect loss of ant diversity in a tropical agroecosystem. Oecologia 108: 577-582

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Hanson P and Cartin V (1997) Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 935-945

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Stachow U, Takacs DA, Brubaker HW, Dumas AR, Meaney JJ, O'Neil JAS, Onsi DE and Corzilius DB (1992) Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems. Most biological diversity exists in human-managed ecosystems. BioScience 42: 354-362

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AG (1996) Arthropod diversity in forest patches and agroecosystems of tropical landscapes. In: Schelhas J and Greenberg R (eds) Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes, pp 91-110. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AG and Flecker AS (1996) The role of biodiversity in tropical managed ecosystems. In: Orians GLH, Dirzo R and Cushman JH (eds) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests. Ecological Studies, Vol 122, pp 173-194. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AG and Flecker AS (2000) Agroecosystems and Biodiversity. http://www.si.edu/smbc/cacao/power. Htm

  • Rice RA and Greenberg R (2000) Cacao cultivation and the conservation of biological diversity. Ambio 29: 167-174

    Google Scholar 

  • Root RS (1973) Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs 43: 95-120

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel EP (1989) Enemy hypothesis: a review of the effect of vegetational diversity on predatory insects and parasitoids. Environmental Entomology 18: 590-599

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelhas J and Greenberg R (1996) Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Fremsn and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule J, Carré D and Jackson W (1990) In: Carroll CR, Vandermeer JH and Rosset PM (eds) Ecological Impact of Modern Agriculture Agroecology. pp 113-188, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE (1991) Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 321-337

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies C and Tscharntke T (1999) Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285: 893-895

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T (2000) Parasitoid populations in the agricultural landscape. In: Hochberg ME and Ives AR (eds) Parasitoid Population Biology, pp 235-254. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt AD, Stork NE, Eggleton P, Srivastara D, Bolton B, Laren TB, Brendell MJD and Bignell DE (1997) Impact of forest loss and regeneration on insect abundance and diversity. In: Watt SD, Stork NE and Hunter MD (eds) Forest and Insects, pp 273-286. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Western D and Pearl MC (1989) Conservation for the Twenty-first Century. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM (1994) The Chocolate Tree. Smithsonian Institution, Washington and London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Alexandra-Maria Klein, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter & Teja Tscharntke

Authors
  1. Alexandra-Maria Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teja Tscharntke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, AM., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. Predator–prey ratios on cocoa along a land-use gradient in Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 683–693 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015548426672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015548426672

Search

Navigation