Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive Management: An Emancipatory Methodology

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An erosion of the power of people and their communities to control any more than a fragment of their future continues. Educational and governmental policy decisions are, for the most part, mandated from above and/or outside the community. This paper introduces a model which reflects Freire's humanizing pedagogy. This method is a vehicle, an avenue of empowerment for people and their communities to control their own destiny and the future of their community. The model is Interactive Management (IM) and its derivative, The CogniScope System. IM is a specialized system of management using collaborative teamwork to define and resolve highly complex issues. The process includes the integration of the diversity of perceptions of the participants with regard to the given ssues, builds consensus and joint ownership of the process and/or product, and creates a collaborative action plan to accomplish the participants' goals. The principal intangible outcome of the process, however, is the reflective participation, which leads to action, and the learning that occurs among the community of stakeholders present. The process of Interactive Management (IM), enhanced through the use of the CogniScope System, is described and examples of its application by First Nation peoples are shared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Banathy, B. (1996). Designing Social Systems in a Changing World, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1988). Developing Critical Thinking: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, B., and Christakis, A. (1988). A culturally sensitive approach to tribal governance issue management. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 12, 107-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. (1973). A new policy science paradigm. Future 5, 543-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. (1988). The Club of Rome revisited in general systems. Int. Soc. Syst. Sci. XXXI, 35-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. (1996). A people science: The CogniScope System approach. Systems I(1), 16-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A. (1997). The CogniScope and Interactive Management in participatory democracy. Inter-office memo, CWAltd Interactive Management Consultants.

  • Christakis, A. (2000). CogniScope Conversation: Some Lessons Learned in the Arena, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, A., Conway, D., and Dye, K. (1999). Lessons learned from five years of applications of the Cogniscope System approach at the Food and Drug Administration. Paper written for the Food and Drug Administration by CWAltd Interactive Management Consultants.

  • Freire, P. (1999). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, F. (1983). Patterns of individual and organizational learning. In Srivastra, S., et al. (eds.), The Executive Mind, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 192-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vols. I and II, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney, T. (1999). Issues in Freirean Pedagogy. Available online: http://nlu.nl.edu/ace/Resources/Documents/FreireIssues.html.

  • Jackson, M. (1991). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliocca, L., and Christakis, A. (2001). Creating transforming leadership for organizational change: The Cogniscope System approach. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 18(3), 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marule, M. (1984). Traditional Indian government: Of the people, by the people, for the people. In Little Bear, L., Boldt, M., and Long, J. A. (eds.), Pathways to Self-Determination: Canadian Indians and the Canadian State, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, pp. 36-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, G., and Hibino, S. (1994). Breakthrough Thinking, Prima, Rocklin, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday Currency, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, E., and Albert, E. (1966). Peoples of Rimrock: A Study of Values in Five Cultures, Athneum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. (1976). Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. (1990). A Science of General Design, Intersystems, Salinas, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. (1994). A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through Systems Design, 2nd ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J., and Cardenas, R. (1994). A Handbook of Interactive Management, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, G.C. Interactive Management: An Emancipatory Methodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research 15, 111–122 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015288407759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015288407759

Navigation